The hearing on the bail application of Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arrested in the cipher case has been adjourned till September 4. Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain conducted the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application in the cipher case.
According to the sources, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, the lawyers of Chairman PTI, argued on the bail application and Salman Safdar said that the Chairman PTI’s lawyers should not be obstructed in Attock Jail. had to walk one and a half kilometers, a petition has been filed against the trial in Attock Jail.
During the hearing, Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer Ali Bukhari also appeared in the court and said that he would like to give arguments on his client’s bail application today.
According to media reports, PTI chairman’s lawyers requested to hear the arguments on the bail application, while special prosecutor FIA opposed hearing the arguments on the PTI chairman’s bail application today.
According to media reports, Special Prosecutor FIA objected to the petitions filed by PTI’s legal team in the Islamabad High Court and said that they requested to postpone the hearing on the bail petition.
According to media reports, during the hearing, the FIA prosecutor said that Chairman PTI has filed petitions related to this court in the High Court, while Chairman PTI’s lawyer Intizar Panjotha said that we withdraw the petitions from the High Court. , the High Court did not stay the bail application.
The FIA prosecutor said that the hearing of the case has been postponed, nothing can be done now.
According to media reports, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the judge of the Special Secret Court adjourned the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application till September 4.
It should be remembered that Chairman PTI was arrested and transferred to Attock Jail after serving 3 years in the Tosha Khana case on August 5 and FIA also arrested him in the Cipher missing case while in custody.
A few days ago, the Islamabad High Court had suspended the sentence of Chairman PTI in the Tosha Khana case, but his release was not possible due to his arrest in the cipher case.
#hearing #PTI #chairmans #bail #application #adjourned #September
How might the conditions of custody affect the legal strategies employed by the chairman’s defense team?
**Interview with Legal Expert on PTI Chairman’s Bail Case**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re here to discuss the recent developments in the bail application hearing for the Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which has been adjourned until September 4. Can you give us your thoughts on the current situation?
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. The adjournment of the hearing is significant as it reflects the complexities involved in high-profile cases, especially those related to political figures. The Special Secret Court, presided over by Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain, has a challenging task ahead, balancing legal proceedings with the political implications.
**Interviewer:** Absolutely. The lawyers for PTI’s chairman, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, highlighted some concerns during the hearing. What can you tell us about their arguments?
**Guest:** They raised valid points regarding the conditions faced by the chairman while in custody, specifically the difficulties lawyers encounter when trying to access him in Attock Jail. Salman Safdar pointed out that it is unreasonable for lawyers to have to walk one and a half kilometers to meet with their client. This raises questions about the accessibility of legal representation in such cases.
**Interviewer:** That’s a crucial aspect. We also saw Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer, Ali Bukhari, present in court. What does this signify for the case?
**Guest:** The presence of Qureshi’s lawyer suggests a broader concern among PTI leadership regarding legal challenges. It indicates a unified front among party members and their commitment to addressing the ongoing legal matters together. This might also pave the way for more collaborative legal strategies moving forward.
**Interviewer:** With the hearing adjourned until September 4, what can we expect next?
**Guest:** The adjournment will give the legal teams more time to prepare their arguments and gather evidence. It also allows the court to evaluate the implications of the defense’s claims regarding the treatment of inmates and the legal protocol in such matters. The next hearing will likely be crucial in determining whether bail will be granted or if the case will proceed on the state’s terms.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds as we approach the next hearing date.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. Indeed, we are in for a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s political and legal landscape.
