DEPUTY Deputy for TPN Law and the Ganjar-Mahfud PHPU Legal Team, Firman Jaya Daeli, emphasized that the large number of parties who volunteered to become amicus curiae was not a form of intervention in the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK). In fact, the movement and rise of the amicus curia increasingly strengthens and strengthens the Constitutional Court as the guardian and protector of the constitution to explore and foster substantive justice and authentic truth.
“Thus, regarding the amicus curiae matter, it is certain that it will not disturb, not interfere with, and not interfere with the Constitutional Court. Moreover, the Court Judges have their independence and independence which is guaranteed and protected,” he said to Media Indonesia, Friday (19/4).
According to him, the existence of amicus curiae is guaranteed and protected in the Indonesian constitutional system and in the Indonesian judicial and judicial system. This perspective grows and develops and is useful for the Constitutional Court to decide disputes based on the beliefs of the Court Judges.
“So that the majesty, nobleness and glory of the Constitutional Court’s decision will illuminate and illuminate the nature and ecosystem of the constitution, democracy and sovereignty of the Indonesian people,” he added.
Furthermore, Firman said that the presence of amicus curiae in the context of the 2024 presidential election dispute was increasingly meaningful and extraordinary because it was marked by the increasing number and diversity of groups who became friends of the court. The movement and revival of amicus curiae also becomes increasingly meaningful because it is democratic, pure, non-partisan and comes from independent, independent, credible and professional circles without pressure, without pressure and without external influence.
“The large flow and quality of diversity among amicus curiae circles is increasingly flowing and flooding the Presidential Election dispute at the Constitutional Court, which basically reflects and shows the high, deep and broad understanding, concern and responsibility of the Indonesian people and nation to uphold and strengthen the constitution, democracy and popular sovereignty, ” said Firman.
The existence, usefulness and usefulness of amicus curiae in the context of the Constitutional Court basically functions to correct, overcome and resolve various violations of ethics, morality and the constitution resulting from the politics of nepotism and planned and organized abuse of power relating to and relating to the winning atmosphere of a particular candidate pair in the implementation Presidential election. For this reason, it is very unfortunate if there are certain parties who think that the existence of an amicus curiae can intervene in the Constitutional Court. (Z-6)
#GanjarMahfud #camp #ensures #Amicus #Curiae #intervene #Constitutional #Courts #decision