Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of the president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, defrauded the Treasury of at least 350,000 euros in the years 2020 and 2021. During those fiscal years, it increased its previous income six-fold as a result of mediating the sale of masks during the pandemic and thus earning more than two million euros. After more than a year of work by the tax inspectors, the regional legal service of the Tax Agency issued a report two months ago describing the fraud attributed to González Amador: “The conduct discovered is not the result of a mere error but of conscious, deliberate and clearly malicious conduct that deserves criminal reproach.” In view of the facts accredited by the tax inspection, the legal department considers “timely and appropriate, for the purposes of investigating the fraud, to bring them to the attention of the prosecutor’s office,” according to legal sources familiar with the report.
On January 23, the Tax Agency sent a written complaint to the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Madrid, which opened criminal investigation proceedings that concluded on February 13 with the presentation of a complaint once morest González Amador for two tax crimes and another for falsifying a document. public, as well as once morest four other people and eight commercial companies, all of them involved in the issuance of false invoices to deduct expenses for services never provided.
The legal service report relates how Alberto González Amador, who had become rich in 2020 thanks to intermediation in the sale of masks, tried, in his corporate tax return with the Maxwell Cremona company, to deduct “unreal and fictitious expenses” to through “invoices that do not correspond to services actually provided by the issuers of the invoices, and must therefore be considered false or falsified.” The Tax Agency jurists recount in their report the various forms of fraud allegedly carried out by Alberto González Amador:
An invoice of 620,000 euros “that was never paid”. González Amador’s company presented an invoice for services that the MKE firm supposedly provided as a commission for the sale of merchandise. The Tax Agency’s jurists point out that the contract did not specify what merchandise they were, nor what services were going to be provided, nor the percentage paid on sales. In addition, they warned that the invoice was issued only “24 days following signing the contract.” González Amador acknowledged to the Treasury that the invoice “was never paid.” “And the services,” the report adds, “were not provided by MKE either.”
922,000 euros for vaccines that were never sold. To deduct more expenses, Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend presented an invoice in favor of Gayani, a company in the Ivory Coast with which he had supposedly contracted his intermediation services in the sale of anti-Covid vaccines on June 1. Only 15 days later – and according to the false story of González, who currently shares his home with the president of the Community of Madrid –, he paid that firm 922,585 euros for the sale of two million vaccines to the health authorities of the Ivory Coast. . When the inspectors asked for information regarding this expense that González Amador intended to deduct, they found, according to the report from the Tax Agency’s legal services, “contradictory and implausible justifications.” Maxwell, Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend’s company, “acknowledged that the vaccines were never sold and that the commission was not paid.”
What affects the most is what happens closest. So you don’t miss anything, subscribe.
False invoices to companies of people residing in Arahal (Seville). The legal service of the Tax Agency also breaks down a series of invoices for 178,000 euros that González Amador presented to deduct more expenses from five companies linked to three people residing in Arahal (Seville). “There are indications of falsehood. Maxwell recognizes that most of these documented services would not be deductible because they are not related to his activity,” states the Tax Agency report.
The inspection “favors” González Amador in an operation with Quirón Salud. The regional legal service reports a strange operation through which González Amador carries out a contract assignment in favor of another company he owns, called Masterman, corresponding to the services that Maxwell provided to Quirón Salud. The report describes this operation as “artificial, illicit and “unequivocally a fraud”, and then reproaches the tax inspectorate for having proposed “a favorable regularization” for González Amador that allows it to “reduce the amount defrauded in 2021”.
Accounting crime absorbed by tax crime. Although the tax inspectors pointed out in their actions an accounting crime “due to fictitious entries in their books, the omitted or falsified entries exceeding the amount of 240,000 euros per year”, the legal service of the Tax Agency considers that “the facts being the same, “The accounting crime is absorbed by the tax crime.” Regarding the crime of document falsification, the report refers to the invoices analyzed as follows: “The document is false, is completely untruthful and narrates totally untrue facts.” “We find ourselves,” he concludes, “in the presence of a continuing crime as these are invoices prepared based on a preconceived plan.”
The legal service of the Tax Agency analyzed the allegations presented by Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend and concluded that they did not refute the criminal evidence. In addition, he reported once morest a deferred regularization that González Amador intended to make, “following verifying that the inspection did not admit the explanations and justifications given,” to declare as income in 2022 most of the invoices “that are believed to be false or falsified.” ” of 2020 and 2021. “This way of regularizing is not tax correct.” “This tax return,” the report states, “does not make a correct temporal allocation of fictitious expenses improperly deducted that cannot be converted into income in a subsequent year.”
The jurists who analyzed the facts concluded that González Amador had committed an intentional crime by knowing what he was doing and wanting to do it, as explained by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. “The exculpatory explanations and justifications put forward are implausible and unacceptable.”
to continue reading
_
