2023-05-24 23:35:29
During yesterday’s hearing, Adji Sarr’s lawyers did not submit any material evidence. Thus, they focused their defense on what Me Abdou Dialy Kane called a “Strong PRESUMPTION” of Ousmane Sonko’s guilt.
For them, the absence of material evidence in criminal matters does not mean the absence of a crime. The presence of Ousmane Sonko on the scene and his refusal to submit to a DNA test are, for them, a strong PRESUMPTION of guilt.
→ READ ALSO: Ousmane Sonko, the target of change: Societal division around the man who wanted to change the system (By Franz Bonaparta)
The Public Ministry, in concluding its indictment, DOUBTED its ability to convince the judge of the guilt of the accused for the crime of RAPE. Hence his explicit request which proves his impotence: “Mr. President, if however you cannot qualify acts of rape, please qualify acts of CORRUPTION of youth (embezzlement of the victim aged 19 years old at the time of the facts by the accused)»n, notes Ayoba Faye.
If to prove the crime of RAPE, the lawyers of the civil party summoned the worst enemy of the Truth in a criminal case: the PRESUMPTION is that the “match” is lost in advance, as reported by the journalist Ayoba Fay. If in addition the Prosecutor expresses a DOUBT as to the judge’s decision, what will the latter do?
→ READ ALSO: Sperm taken from Adji Sarr? Gynecologist Alfousseyni Gaye comes out of silence (press release)
→ READ ALSO: Direct / Live – Adji Sarr case: Follow Ousmane Sonko’s statement
1684975612
#exit #Adji #Sarrs #lawyers #shows #match #lost #advance
