The executives of the EXP camp took “Lawyer Nida” to the court appointment.

2023-05-22 11:43:00

following the EXP Entertainment label filed a lawsuit “Attorney Tam Sithra Pheangkerd” in defamation cases through From the case where the news desk was referred to together with “Porse Narakorn Isarawarangkul” Lead singer of the band Yes Indeed to request termination of the contract with the label. Because it was seen that the contract was unfair. Until causing the society to misunderstand the company

The latest today (May 22) at 1:00 p.m. “Top Wongphat Ratipatcharaphonkul” company executive experience Entertainment (EXP Entertainment) as the plaintiff along with “Lawyer Nida Saranya Wangsukcharoen” Including the parties like “Attorney Tam Sithra” as the defendant came to the Nonthaburi Provincial Court. According to the court’s appointment was completed.

by lawyer Nida and Top revealed to the media that today is an appointment for the defendant to acknowledge the accusation to schedule the next hearing. confirmed that there was actual damage because the other party took the message to post and hang on social media

Lawyer Nida: “Today the court scheduled an appointment. It is an appointment with the testimony of the defendant. Because in the last match That is, we file a lawsuit. It is a charge of defamation through . The last meeting was a preliminary hearing. The court stamped on the prosecution with merit. Today will be the appointment of the defendant. The principle is to acknowledge the allegations. Then it will be a scheduled hearing. The court will ask the defendant whether you accept the condition or deny according to our lawsuit in order to know the defendant’s approach whether to accept or reject We will have scheduled the next Witness Detective Day. In this case, we did not sue for damages. We sue for defamation by .

as a lawyer We can only say trends. Chances of losing or winning a case But since working Things I’ve never heard from lawyer Nida. Is confident that this case will win or lose for sure because one with a lawyer’s ethics The only two people who can decide whether a case is guilty or not guilty are the courts. But what we come to prosecute today We feel that our customers have been damaged. We take this fact to court. We see that we have been damaged. Does the court agree? If the court agrees, the court rules. let him get a prison sentence If the court disagrees, the lawsuit is dismissed. Therefore, if you want lawyer Nida to confirm like everyone else that this one wins This is definitely a loss, we have never done it.”

In the past, there was no mediation. because the other party confirmed that he had never lost a defamation case
Lawyer Nida: “No. From what we’ve seen, we can pretty much understand why. That’s why he didn’t want to mediate here. Because he always insisted that he never lost a defamation case which we do not know either but in our corner We feel that our clients have been damaged. what to say One, it has some facts. that we accept that it is But what we brought It has many points. The client brought evidence to confirm. That many things are not as true as he said. And if there is an argument by a lawyer It will have to bring the case to court. Not bringing anyone to talk regarding each other on social media and let social media punish the other person.”

Top Camp CEO: “Wait and listen. because when it happened It was really damaged, nothing. We have to wait and see what the court says.”

Lawyer Nida: “I’m not worried regarding anything. Because as a lawyer We think we have a duty to demand justice for our clients. Now we look at the evidence. It contains many parts where the defendant has shown news. I myself used to make a press release to my clients. But that we press the news. We must be as careful as possible. One, we also made excuses for our clients. Do not allow our clients to be attacked or damaged. but at the same time We must not use false stories to attack each other. So today we come to sue because we see What the defendant did was beyond the rules. So ask if we are worried today. We are confident in our facts. That the facts we can prove to the court. exactly what he said it’s not true As for him, he will lose or a lawsuit. It depends on the discretion of the court further.

Now, if Nida evaluates his approach to fighting, this message, Nida thinks that if the message is not wrong no defamation Not damaged…it’s not. Otherwise we wouldn’t have sued. But what he may not be punished. The court may consider him to be in good faith. Now we have to continue to see how honest it is. We, ourselves, would like to know as well. If the court judges that what the defendant did it can do this Next, we will apply that you can hurt other people like this as well and claimed that we came to protect the benefit of the client.”

The case for breach of contract pending separated into separate cases
Sainida: “That case is in court. pending separate each case. This is a matter of defamation. Actually, to say that we and other lawyers He also used to make a lot of press conferences for other clients. But in most cases, no one has been sued. We never sued anyone. Because he did it in the frame it should be. But this one, we think it’s beyond the framework that he should do.”

Considered to be the first meeting with the defendant. following being hung on social media
Lawyer Nida: Yes, we met for the first time. Ask if you’re worried or not. Because we don’t want to quarrel with anyone, we want to work and want everyone to be able to distinguish. that the relationship between siblings between professional colleagues is a relationship But we want everyone to be able to distinguish. that the profession that we must do In order to maintain the benefit of the client, it must be done. Personally, right now there is nothing to sue. If today it’s like this, it’s okay like this. We can accept it. But in the future, if there is something more. And we felt that it was too much and out of the game until it was unacceptable. I thought that it might take some action, but as of today it doesn’t have that. Finally, in the matter of defamation cases. The court will make another appointment. September.”

“Attorney Tam Sitra Bia Rangkerd” was revealed to the media. that today came as a defendant but no worries Because he has been through a lot of defamation cases like this. speak out for the benefit of the client Please wait to hear whether what you have done is wrong or not wrong.

“Today I was sued. On the subject of defamation with It’s a record label company. At that time, I went out to make a statement regarding Nong Porse. regarding unfair contracts It turns out that the record label has filed a defamation lawsuit. The court investigated whether there was evidence. The class is now considered. I came as the defendant to deny and summarize the guidelines. How many more witnesses will there be? how much the plaintiff How much is the defendant I asked to wait and hear the results. What I did for the members of Yes Indeed is wrong or wrong.

No worries at all. I’ve been through a lot of defamation cases. was confident that we went out to speak We go out to protect the interests of our clients. And it’s helping a group of children. who has a dream of becoming a singer want to be an artist but is limited by the record label that had a contract at that time.”

1684756653
#executives #EXP #camp #Lawyer #Nida #court #appointment

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.