Right, so, "Commerce" you say? Riveting. Naturally, like a glazed donut in a sugar factory, it’s behind a paywall. As if the headline wasn’t already beige enough.
Oh look, farmers. Angry farmers. Chuckles mirthlessly. Sounds about right. They’re probably fuming over the price of a tractor tyre ever since that fella Trump decided Brexit was a fantastic idea.
"Trade agreement with South America." Oh, the allure of a good old fashioned mercantilist bonanza. Imagine, lads: 780 million consumers, all clamouring for overpriced European cheese and questionable fashion.
Of course, someone’s gotta be the drama queen in this global marketplace tango, isn’t there? Enter France. They’re the only ones having a go at this South American shindig. Typical.
Let’s be honest, unless it involves berets, mime artists, or complaining about the price of croissants, the French just aren’t interested.
But seriously, they’re worried about the environment, the farmers, the… squints at notes "industrial fabric?" Sounds like someone’s been watching too much Marx.
That being said, if Trump resurrects himself like some sort of orange-tinted zombie, I wouldn’t be surprised if everyone starts grabbing onto any trade deal they can get their hands on.
It’s a funny old world, isn’t it? One minute you’re worried about global warming, the next you’re fighting over the right to sell cheap tractors to sweaty Argentinians.
And don’t even get me started on the Chinese. They’re just waiting in the wings with their chopsticks ready to scoop up whatever’s left.
Bloody hell. Commerce, eh? More like a circus designed by a Machiavellian accountant.
Maybe we should all just grow our own veg and wear burlap sacks. At least then we’d know where we stand.
Commerce
Article reserved for subscribers
Angry farmers fileObject of the farmers’ mobilization from Monday, the trade agreement with South America is, for the majority of European states, essential to the economic security of the EU, especially after the election of Donald Trump. France is the only big country to want to oppose it.
Will Trump 2.0 accelerate the signing of the free trade agreement between the European Union and Mercosur (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) which should create a vast commercial zone of 780 million inhabitants? ? The fear aroused by the imminent return to power of this isolationist Republican, who has promised to launch a trade war against Europe and China, pushes the Commission and the vast majority of Member States to want to conclude as quickly as possible. , even if this means going beyond France. Especially since China is only waiting for one thing, to take Europe’s place in a market in which it is increasingly present.
Already, the election of Trump 1.0 had given new vigor to these trade agreements whose hour of glory seemed to have passed. Thus, two years after the 2016 election, the Union finalized negotiations which had dragged on for almost ten years with Japan before entering into a series of agreements with Singapore, Vietnam and New Zealand. Today, Europe has the largest free trade system in the world, having concluded around forty treaties.
Part of public opinion, particularly in France, remains opposed to it, seeing it as a threat to agriculture, the environment and the industrial fabric. But American isolationism – which has not been denied during the presidency of Joe Biden, notably with the adoption of the Inflation Reduction Act aimed at accelerating the transition
* How might the impact of trade deals on smaller farmers vary from the impact on larger agricultural corporations?
## Interview Excerpt: Angry Farmers and Trade Deals
**Interviewer:** Welcome back to the show. Today we’re diving into the world of international trade, a topic seemingly as exciting as watching paint dry, judging from that paywalled article on “Commerce.” But fear not, we’ve got Dr. Emily Carter here, an expert in agricultural economics, to shed some light on the current state of things. Dr. Carter, thanks for joining us.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** So, the article mentions ”angry farmers.” Now, this isn’t exactly new territory, is it? What’s got them riled up this time?
**Dr. Carter:** Well, farmers globally are facing a myriad of challenges, from fluctuating commodity prices to increasing input costs. The article’s sarcastic tone aside, it hints at concerns over trade agreements, particularly how they impact agricultural livelihoods.
**Interviewer:** This supposed South American trade deal seems to be firing up some controversy. France, apparently, isn’t too keen on it.
**Dr. Carter:** Yes, France has voiced concerns about potential environmental and social impacts. They’re particularly worried about the effect on smaller farmers and the “industrial fabric” of local economies.
**Interviewer:** “Industrial fabric,” huh? Sounds a tad dramatic.
**Dr. Carter:** (chuckles) It’s certainly a strong phrase. Essentially, they’re arguing for a more sustainable and equitable approach to trade.
**Interviewer:** And the article suggests that if Donald Trump were to suddenly return…
**Dr. Carter:** (laughing) Oh yes, the ever-present shadow of the former president. The point is, in unpredictable times, countries tend to gravitate towards securing any trade deals they can, regardless of potential downsides.
**Interviewer:** Fair enough. But ultimately, we’re talking about a complex web of economic and political interests, right?
**Dr. Carter:** Absolutely. International trade is a delicate balancing act. We need to ensure that agreements benefit all parties involved, particularly those most vulnerable to its effects.
**Interviewer:** Dr. Carter, thank you for breaking down this seemingly cryptic world of commerce for us. Always a pleasure.
**Dr. Carter:** My pleasure.
