2024-04-06 15:11:00
“Dr. Anon” points out the economic theory and psychology of “Ung Ing” as the political heir of “Thaksin” that will make the “Seththa” chair unstable. He points out the constitutional economic theory of Prof. Rangsan that the “heir” helps save capital. politics Easy to manipulate, well explained.
Very interesting today (6 April 2024) Asst. Prof. Dr. Anon Sakworawit Department of Citizen Data Science Department of Statistics Department of Insurance Science and Risk Management Faculty of Applied Statistics The National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) posted a message on the Facebook page of Asst. Prof. Dr. Anon Sakworawit, titled “Ung Ing is Thaksin’s political heir from economic theory and psychology, stating that
“Professor Rangsan Thanapornphan once wrote in the book Constitutional Economics that if we analyze it from the principles of economics as it is (Descriptive approach), we can understand that When politicians choose to use heirs or relatives to participate in politics, they save enormous economic costs. Because it will already be well known and can be sold without having to create or publicize it to be well known. The public already knows. Therefore, creating an heir or inheriting a political heir is a way to save political costs. Give worthwhile returns Therefore, it is a very popular method.
I believe in Professor Rangsan Thanapornphan’s theory of constitutional economics more because it explains political matters better.
Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra is using the genetic theory (Genetics) or the psychological theory that some psychologists believe that genetics (nature) has a greater effect on intelligence than upbringing or environment (Nurture).
One psychologist who tried to prove that intelligence is a result of genetics is Sir Cyril Burt, who studied the relationship between haploid twins, haploid twins, and haploid twins raised together. A pair of brooding twins are raised separately. Siblings of the same pregnancy raise together. Siblings of the same pregnancy raised separately. The so-called twin studies Burt asserted that intelligence is a result of genetics rather than nurture. It was later discovered following Burt’s death that Burt fabricated data, probably not unlike Nattaphon. Honestly, in the case of the doctoral dissertation at Chula, this caused general psychology textbooks to have to be dismantled and revised.
Arthur Jensen is a well-known educational psychologist and individual psychologist. He is a person who has ideas regarding This Nature-Nurture debate supports the idea that That intelligence It is mainly influenced by genetics. And there are differences between races that cause different intelligence. Jensen’s comments and results of the study were met with strong opposition in the United States, where they were viewed as racist.
While Anne Anastasi, a world-renowned psychometrician, As president of the American Psychological Association in 1958, he gave a speech at an American psychology convention that settled the debate over the question of whether intelligence is a result of genetics or upbringing. But asking the question from a pragmatist perspective: So what to do? People’s intelligence is not the same. It may come from both genetics and actual upbringing. But what can society and education do to enable them to live in society, be able to work, and be useful to society? Not a burden to society and can be happy
Anne Anastasi’s views are widely accepted by psychologists and educators today.
Howard Gardner studied and formulated the theory of multiple intelligence in 1983, stating that intelligence has many aspects, such as music, spatial, language, numbers, and movement. in interpersonal relationships through self-understanding through understanding nature, etc. Each of us has different intelligence in each aspect. It is necessary to understand and develop people in accordance with the intellectual potential of each person who has different multiple intelligences in each aspect.
The fact that Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra said that Ong Ing has the DNA of himself and Khunying Potjaman. If Thaksin can do it, Aung Ing can certainly do it. It shows that Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra is of the view that intelligence is a result of genetics rather than upbringing.
But it must be admitted that Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra and Khunying Potjaman probably had the same part in raising Oung Ing. Therefore, Oong Ing’s intelligence is likely influenced by both genetics and upbringing.
What is interesting is Similar genetics Given the same upbringing, will they be equally smart? Will Oak Aem Aung Ing be equally smart?
What regarding the ability or intelligence that Mr. Thaksin refers to? What kind of intelligence is it? Looking at Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences
So does Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra believe like Burt or Jensen that intelligence or intelligence is inherited through genetics or DNA?
I probably won’t confirm that. What Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra said was said because he believed in his own and his wife’s genetics and how well they would be able to pass on their abilities and intelligence to their daughter, Oung Ing.
What I am more confident in is Constitutional Economic Theory of Professor Rangsan Thanapornphan of the Faculty of Economics Thammasat University which he said Playing politics by the heirs of politicians or inheriting political heirs saves political costs. It’s also more reliable. It should be much easier to manipulate and manipulate.
From constitutional economic theory and the words of Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra, I can predict that Mr. Settha Thaweesin’s position as Prime Minister is becoming unstable.”
1712425417
#Anon #reads #words #Thaksin #shaking #chair #Seththa #economic #theory #psychology #Ung #Ing #planned #heir