As the hours go by, it becomes known that the murder of the trucker who refused to join the truckers’ picket lines It was more bloody than suspected. Not only was there a previous fight nor was the stone thrown “like a missile” that hit Guillermo Jara squarely in the face, but also that blow killed him instantlysaid the prosecutor.
“Instant death”
“The stone hit Guillermo’s temple, in the right frontoparietal bone, and caused instant death”counted Fabius Arcomanus with autopsy results in hand.
the owner of the UFI Nº6 of the Trenque Lauquen Judicial Department indicated that the projectile “shattered the skull” of the victim and even caused “loss of brain matter.”
How was the attack on Guillermo Jara
Jara, 45 years old, died the day before yesterday following resisting to stop his truck next to the protest that a group of carriers carried out in the Buenos Aires city of Daireaux. For the fact three truckers are detained, Darío Javier Martín, 46 years old; Federico Javier Fernandez, 34; and Fabian Paredes, 44.
They were part of a demonstration with a cut off of route 65 and “We have a hypothesis that allows us to prove a fraudulent action in the face of this event”pointed out the prosecutor Arcomano during an interview by FM Urbana.
Before being chased down the road, Jara got into a fight with some of the protesters while parked at a Puma gas station on the outskirts of Daireaux. It was following that that he decided to leave the picket line and move towards his destination. “There was an argument, a brawl” that generated “anger and anger” the demonstrators who then came out to chase them with several vehicles.
The details of the prosecutor
One of the witnesses spoke of Jara had a compressed air rifle, but for the prosecutor that data “it is absolutely relevant” and it does not remove responsibility from the accused. The key is that three vehicles chased the truck, at one point overtaking it and throwing stones at it that they had previously collected.
“From the bed of one of the trucks, at least one or two of the defendants would have thrown the stone at him that destroyed the windshield of the truck and hit him squarely in the left parietal bone” of Jara. This, “in principle, it is the cause of death”he claimed.
According to the prosecutor, the victim had been filming the protesters with his cell phone. This has not yet been checked and will be done when the phone, which is in the hands of the prosecution, is reviewed. “A witness appreciates a maneuver that might be filmingwhich would not be strange today, is a fairly common attitude”, he specified in dialogue with Branca back by AM750.
The truth is that the trucker “They killed him with a stone”, Arcomano sentenced and said that the police doctor who first examined Jara’s body realized that the victim “had a small bruise on his chest as a result of being hit with the steering wheel. But the injury that caused death was the stone that hit the right temple and destroyed the skull, with loss of brain mass.
The prosecution is accredited that “there would be a malicious act of the subjects who tried to intimidate and frighten someone who had dared to break with that demonstration, “he added.
The three defendants are truckers from Daireaux and what is still analyzed is whether there might be any accusation once morest the picket leaders in this fact or if everything will fall only once morest those who persecuted and threw the stone once morest Jara.
“It does not appear at the moment that there are other actors involved,” explained Arcomano. the learned they would have no record according to what they collated in the investigation so far.
On the other hand, the prosecutor confirmed the existence of an audio that went viral on networks social events in which the moments prior to Jara’s murder are recounted. The person describing the events was summoned as a witness. “For the prosecution, it becomes relevant and he joins following the police find him and brings him to testify.but the presence of elements of social networks ’empiojas’ the cause”, he concluded.
