The Crescent ball did not cross the goal line..and the victory deserved a penalty

Essam Abdel-Fattah, the former Egyptian international referee, confirmed that Al-Nasr Club deserved a penalty kick once morest Al-Fayhaa, adding that the match referee’s decision was correct not to count a goal for Al-Hilal once morest Al-Tai.

Essam revealed, in an interview with “In the Goal”: A penalty kick for Al Hilal, which the referee did not count in the 46th minute, he should have counted it, and the other shot was in the touch of the Al-Taie defender’s hand. .

He added: Mohamed Kno, the player of Al-Hilal, deserved a yellow card for his intervention at the 79th minute, and the 92nd minute witnessed a shot that did not count as a goal for Al-Hilal, and the referee’s decision was correct because a small part of the ball remained on the line and there was no penalty kick in the shot itself.

And the former Egyptian referee added regarding the Al-Wahda and Al-Ittihad matches, Al-Fayhaa and Al-Nasr: Al-Ittihad’s penalty kick is correct for blocking the defender’s path to the attacker. As for the Al-Fayhaa and Al-Nasr match, the referee made a mistake by not awarding a penalty kick for Al-Nasr in the 62nd minute.

Leave a Replay