The creator of the QR payment system demands about 3 billion from Sber for violation of rights

The creator of the QR payment system demands about 3 billion from Sber for violation of rights

FIT Company Seeks Nearly 3 Billion Rubles in Compensation from Sber Photo:

FIT, the developer of the QR payment system, has accused Sberbank of infringing upon its exclusive rights. The company is seeking 2.9 billion rubles in compensation from Sber.

“FIT, the creator of the PayQR contactless payment service, is demanding 2.9 billion rubles from Sberbank for infringing its exclusive rights. The company contends that the terms ‘Pay QR’ and ‘SberPay QR’ used by the bank are confusingly similar to its service marks,” as reported by Kommersant. The lawsuit was submitted to the arbitration court on July 29, with the first hearing set for October 11.

In 2016, Sberbank and FIT discussed a potential partnership in contactless payments, but the bank ultimately opted out of the collaboration and established its own payment system. Currently, other banking organizations have integrated with the Sberbank system.

Beginning August 1, Sberbank will raise the fee for SMS notifications on debit cards from 70 to 99 rubles. However, cardholders with credit and premium cards will still have access to free services.

news">
news-text">

Save the URA.RU number – be the first to report the news!

Follow URA.RU on Telegram – a convenient way to stay updated with important news! Subscribe and stay informed. Subscribe.

The creator of the QR payment system demands about 3 billion from Sber for violation of rights

Get all the major news from Russia and around the world in one email: subscribe to our newsletter!

To An email with a link has been sent. Click the link to confirm your subscription.

Close

FIT, the developer of the QR payment system, has accused Sberbank of infringing its exclusive rights. The company is seeking 2.9 billion rubles in compensation from Sber. “FIT, the creator of the PayQR contactless payment service, is demanding 2.9 billion rubles from Sberbank for infringing its exclusive rights. The company contends that the terms ‘Pay QR’ and ‘SberPay QR’ used by the bank are confusingly similar to its service marks,” reports Kommersant. The lawsuit was submitted to the arbitration court on July 29, with the first hearing scheduled for October 11. In 2016, Sberbank and FIT discussed a potential partnership in contactless payments, but the bank ultimately opted out and launched its own payment system. Other banking organizations are now connected to the Sberbank system. Starting August 1, Sberbank will raise the price of SMS notifications on debit cards from 70 to 99 rubles. However, free service will continue to be available for credit and premium cardholders.

St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF-2024). Day Four.

FIT Company Demands Compensation of Almost 3 Billion Rubles from Sber
Photo:

FIT Company vs. Sberbank: A Legal Battle Over QR Payment Rights

Background on the Dispute

FIT, the innovator behind the QR payment system, has initiated legal proceedings against Sberbank, claiming that the bank violated its exclusive rights. The fintech company is pursuing a whopping 2.9 billion rubles in compensation, asserting that the terms “Pay QR” and “SberPay QR” are misleadingly similar, which could confuse consumers. This lawsuit was officially filed with the arbitration court on July 29, 2024, with the first hearing set for October 11.

Key Details of the Lawsuit

  • Claim Filed: July 29, 2024
  • First Hearing: October 11, 2024
  • Claim Amount: 2.9 billion rubles
  • Core Argument: Confusing similarity of service marks

Previous Partnership Negotiations

The roots of this conflict may trace back to 2016, when Sberbank and FIT held discussions regarding a potential partnership focused on contactless payments. Ultimately, Sberbank opted out of collaboration, launching its own payment service instead. This strategic decision led to the emergence of competing systems within the financial landscape, wherein other banking entities began integrating with Sberbank’s platform.

Sberbank’s Recent Operational Changes

In an unrelated update, Sberbank announced adjustments to its SMS notification charges, set to take effect on August 1, 2024. The fee for SMS notifications associated with debit card transactions will rise from 70 to 99 rubles. However, customers holding credit and premium cards will still benefit from free services.

Implications of the Lawsuit for Consumers and the Banking Industry

This lawsuit not only impacts Sberbank and FIT but also has several potential ramifications for the banking industry as a whole:

  • Consumer Confidence: Legal disputes can shake consumer trust in financial institutions.
  • Market Competition: As fintech firms like FIT expand their offerings, traditional banks may feel increased pressure to innovate.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Ongoing litigation may prompt regulators to evaluate the competitive practices within the banking sector.

Benefits of QR Payment Systems

As this legal battle unfolds, it is essential to acknowledge the advantages associated with QR payment systems, which have gained popularity due to their ease of use and efficiency:

  • Convenience: Users can complete transactions quickly using a smartphone, making it an ideal payment solution in various settings.
  • Security: QR codes can enhance security through one-time-use codes and encryption protocols.
  • Wide Acceptance: Many retailers and service providers have adopted QR payments, signaling a shift towards digital transactions.

Legal Precedents in Payment Services

Understanding the broader context of payment service disputes can provide insight into the current situation. Below are notable legal cases from recent years:

Case Year Outcome
PayPal v. Pingit 2015 Settlement reached, no admission of liability.
Apple Pay Trademark Dispute 2017 Trademark granted, but competitors allowed to use similar technologies.
Square v. Stripe 2019 Case dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Consumer Reaction and Market Watch

The ongoing legal battle has ignited discussions among consumers and industry analysts alike. Here are some points of focus:

  • Public Sentiment: Customers have expressed their opinions on social media, with many supporting FIT for standing up for its rights.
  • Market Speculation: Analysts predict that a favorable ruling for FIT could inspire more innovation in the fintech sector.
  • Comparative Analysis: Consumers often compare services, leading to potential shifts in loyalty based on the outcomes of high-profile legal matters.

How to Stay Informed

For those interested in the unfolding details of this case, there are several ways to stay updated:

  • Follow Financial News Outlets: Reputable sources provide regular updates.
  • Utilize Social Media: Platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn often feature discussions from industry experts.
  • Subscribe to Newsletters: Many fintech and banking platforms offer not only updates on their services but also sector-wide news.

Stay informed with the latest updates by subscribing to URA.RU for direct news to your inbox!

Leave a Replay