The court annulled the remand of Grigeo’s president Gintautas Pangonis

The court annulled the remand of Grigeo’s president Gintautas Pangonis

As the Šiauliai District Court informs, on September 11 at the trial session held, the accused G. Pangoni, the main shareholder and president of AB Grigeo Klaipėda and AB Grigeo Group, and his lawyer, submitted to the court a request to cancel the pretrial measure assigned to him – a written promise not to leave.

The accused told the court that the pretrial detention makes it very difficult for him to work, business trips and travels – he has his own companies in nearby Latvia, he has to go there often, there are also business trips to Poland and elsewhere.

G. Pangonis claimed that the preventive measure severely restricts business. The defendant assured that he knew all the scheduled court hearing dates in this case, so he was not planning any trips at that time. The prosecutor told the court that the mildest military measure is applied to the accused, which disciplines the accused, thus ensuring G. Pangoni’s participation in the court hearings and the smooth trial of the case.

As stated in the ruling issued by the court, Mr. Pangonis is accused of organizing and leading an organized group that systematically violated the rules of environmental protection established by legal acts, as a result of which great damage was caused to nature, of forging documents and disposing of them, as a result of which great damage was caused , abused his official position for material and other personal gains.

The court noted that the accused G. Pangonis did not violate the conditions of the remand measure assigned to him, he was repeatedly granted permission to leave for various foreign countries and in all cases he returned to the Republic of Lithuania on time and continued to attend court hearings. In addition, as can be seen from the case data, the accused has a permanent residence in the Republic of Lithuania, owns real estate, works, is married, that is, he has strong social ties with the Republic of Lithuania.

<img alt="Žygimantas Gedvilas/BNS photo/Gintautas Pangonis” rel=”content-image” src=”https://s1.15min.lt/static/cache/NjcweCwsNzIxODg4LG9yaWdpbmFsLCxpZD01MTczNTUwJmRhdGU9MjAyMCUyRjAxJTJGMDksMTQ0OTgwODAxMQ==/gintautas-pangonis-5e1709218dfee.jpg” style=”width: auto; height: auto;”/>

Žygimantas Gedvilas/BNS photo/Gintautas Pangonis

Taking into account these circumstances, as well as the nature of the criminal acts charged against the accused, the fact that G. Pangonis has not been convicted before, attends court hearings and does not interfere with the process, the court decided that it is inappropriate to continue to apply a pretrial measure to the accused – a written promise not to leave, therefore there is a basis cancel the preventive measure.

In a ruling announced on Tuesday, the Šiauliai District Court annulled this preventive measure. The decision enters into force from the date of its adoption.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
FB.init({
appId: ‘117218911630016’,
version: ‘v2.10’,
status: true,
cookie: false,
xfbml: true
});
};

(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {
return;
}
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = “https://connect.facebook.net/lt_LT/sdk.js”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

#court #annulled #remand #Grigeos #president #Gintautas #Pangonis

**Interview with⁣ Legal Expert on ⁢Gintautas Pangonis’ Court Case**

**Interviewer:** Thank you​ for‌ joining us today. As we’ve learned, ​Gintautas Pangonis, the president of AB Grigeo, recently appeared in court requesting the cancellation of his⁢ pretrial detention ‌measures. Can you give ‍us an overview of the‍ significance of this situation?

**Expert:** Absolutely. Gintautas Pangonis is facing serious charges, ​including leading an organized group‍ that violated ⁢environmental ⁤protection laws and⁢ other crimes related to document ⁢forgery. His request to lift ‍the pretrial measure—which currently restricts his travel—underscores the balancing act between ensuring justice and allowing individuals to maintain their​ professional responsibilities.

**Interviewer:** Pangonis claims that these restrictions hinder his ability to run‍ his business effectively. How often do courts consider the professional obligations ⁣of defendants in ⁢cases like ‍this?

**Expert:** Courts do weigh ‍a defendant’s professional ‍obligations, but this​ is usually⁣ secondary to the risk of flight and the need to⁢ ensure a fair trial. The prosecution argued that maintaining the written promise not to leave ensures Pangonis’ compliance with court hearings. Ultimately, the court must consider⁤ whether allowing travel could jeopardize the integrity of the‍ proceedings.

**Interviewer:** ⁢The court’s ruling indicated that Pangonis‍ has respected previous conditions of his release. How might that impact the⁤ court’s decision on his current request?

**Expert:**⁣ Good behavior can bolster a defendant’s case for modifying pretrial conditions. Since Pangonis has adhered to the requirements so far, the court might be inclined to consider a more lenient approach. ⁢However, the serious nature of the charges could still lead the judges to be cautious.

**Interviewer:** Can you‍ tell us more about ‍the impact of the allegations against Pangonis on AB Grigeo and ⁢the ‌wider community?

**Expert:** Allegations of environmental violations can have significant repercussions for a company’s reputation and operations. ‍If the charges ​are proven,⁤ it could not only damage⁤ the company’s standing but also fuel public concern about environmental issues. This can lead to potential penalties or increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies, which may⁢ impact business practices within the industry as a whole.

**Interviewer:** As this case continues, what should we be looking out for⁢ in the upcoming court‌ sessions?

**Expert:** Key factors to ​watch include the court’s⁤ response to Pangonis’ request and whether there are any shifts in the prosecution’s⁤ strategy. Additionally, any relevant ‌evidence presented during upcoming⁤ hearings could play a pivotal role in determining the case’s outcome. We should also ⁢keep an eye on public sentiment and how it influences the proceedings, especially‍ in light of environmental concerns.

**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights on this developing story. ⁢We appreciate your time and expertise.

**Expert:** Thank you for having me. It’s ⁤an important ‍case that highlights significant legal and ethical issues in business practices today.

Leave a Replay