the Contrada case –

the Contrada case –

Italy is condemned by the European Court docket of Human Rights for the abuse of wiretaps on Bruno Contrada. A ruling which, past the precise case, identifies a “systemic flaw within the Italian laws on wiretapping”. The information was given by the lawyer Stefano Giordano: “I thank your entire agency and the late Marina Silvia Mori for this essential end result”, says the lawyer. The “Contrada v. Italia” case involved the lawfulness of the interception of phone conversations and the search of his house and different belongings, all measures ordered as a part of a felony continuing through which the previous Tremendous Policeman was circuitously concerned.

27 thousand hours of interceptions.  But anyone can say the offending phrases

However what does the ruling of the First Part of Strasbourg say? “The European Court docket of Human Rights (…) unanimously held that there had been a violation of Article 8 (proper to respect for privateness, non-public life and correspondence) of the European Conference on Human Rights in as far as considerations the interception and transcription of the appellant’s phone communications”, reads a notice from Giordano. “It seems that Italian regulation doesn’t supply sufficient and efficient ensures in opposition to abuses in opposition to people subjected to interception measures, however who, since they aren’t suspected or accused of committing once morest the law, aren’t events to the proceedings. Particularly, for these people it’s not doable to show to the judicial authority for an efficient management of the lawfulness and necessity of the measure and to acquire sufficient compensation, relying on the case”.

The lawyer concludes: “We’re very glad, as a result of – past the concrete case – the Court docket has unanimously recognized a really critical flaw within the Italian laws on wiretapping. Now we await the finality of the sentence. The ball subsequently passes to politics , in order that he reforms your entire topic of wiretapping in a liberal sense”.

Toti like Lucano: when wiretaps make the political trial

In brief, a system that permits “wild wiretapping” isn’t according to human rights. The Minister of Justice, Carlo Nordio, on the Trento Economics Competition, in the course of the debate ‘The best way to reconcile economic system and justice’ commented that the ECHR ruling on the Contrada case “is music to my ears, it was a supply of nice pleasure. At present the ECHR says very clearly that Italy has violated all human and civil rights. I now surprise what impact it’s going to have on the continued proceedings. We’ll see how the rights enshrined within the article will finish 15 of the Structure on the confidentiality of communications have been devastated.” “The objection that’s made – added the consultant of Giorgia Meloni’s authorities – is that we’re giving a present to the mafia. As regards the struggle in opposition to the mafia, organized crime, terrorism and critical crime” wiretaps “aren’t they’re solely indispensable, however typically they’re even inadequate. The mafia doesn’t converse on the phone, it communicates by way of very refined technique of communication, which fits past Trojans and bugs. I’d transcend the present laws however solely in the direction of massive crime “. A system that the federal government desires to vary. Within the Nordio invoice “we proposed the minimal wage, i.e. the safety of the third occasion: if Tizio talks to Caio regarding Sempronio, no less than Sempronio’s identify should not seem. It has been used and abused, involving people who find themselves not there they enter nothing”, noticed the minister.

#Contrada #case #Tempo
2024-05-26 03:34:23

Leave a Replay