Constitutional law EXPERT Bivitri Susanti hopes that the Constitutional Court (MK) can explore substantive justice in the 2024 Presidential Election Results Dispute (PHPU) trial at the Constitutional Court (MK). The 14 working day time limit for dispute resolution is considered to be a challenge to prove the arguments and legal arguments submitted by the applicants.
According to him, the PHPU presidential election procedural law in the Constitutional Court seemed to discourage the parties from being able to reveal the substantive truth as a whole.
“One of the reasons for being confined is time limits, it has implications for limiting the number of witnesses, the way witnesses are examined. That is the main obstacle, especially now that the weight of fraud is greater,” said Bivitri in a discussion in Jakarta, Monday (1/4).
Bivitri believes that the large number of frauds that are the subject of a lawsuit at the Constitutional Court should be the basis for a repeat voting for the 2024 presidential election. He believes that if the Constitutional Court decides that there will be a repeat voting, it will not disrupt the presidential inauguration process which is scheduled for October.
“Don’t be locked in by assumptions that it’s impossible for there to be a repeat election and then we get rid of substantive justice, that this is the worst election in Indonesian history,” said Bivitri
Bivitri invites the public to be smart in reading legal events. Bivitri asked the public not to fall for the narrative that the presidential election cannot be repeated.
“Don’t be locked in by the spy war of advocates at the Constitutional Court who are starting to say that it is impossible for the KPU to re-election immediately. When we talk about substantive justice, let’s not be confined by assumptions,” he explained.
(Z-9)
#Constitutional #Courts #Procedural #Law #Limit #Disclosures #Election #Fraud