New “fire” against the “87” is unleashed by sources from Stefanos Kasselakis‘ environment, one day after the file with the nominations for the presidency of SYRIZA was “locked”.
Essentially, the same circles continue the “serial” with the candidacy of Stefanos Kasselakis and the argument that the Central Committee of SYRIZA is not responsible for excluding the “deposed” president from the relevant process.
Yesterday, Thursday (24.10.24) the deadline for the submission of nominations expired, therefore the “87” declare that the Kasselaki issue has now expired.
However, sources of the ousted president answer that the Congress has the final say, in a last-ditch effort to overturn the exclusion of Mr. Kasselakis.
“With anti-democratic and substitutive practices and methods, which now go as far as silencing ordinary members, the opportunistic majority of the K.E. is attempting to obstruct the candidacy of Stefanos Kasselakis for the SYRIZA presidential elections. This tactic, which reveals the concern of those who wish to maintain control of the party even against the will of its members, dynamizes the democratic process and undermines our values”, Mr. Kasselakis’ circles point out.
And they continue: “Indeed, this opportunistic “majority” is leaking to media friendly to the government and Kyriakos Mitsotakis that the candidates for the presidency are allegedly only four, insisting that they operate on substitute terms and misinterpret the party’s constitution.
It is extremely unfortunate that claims are being made that the Central Committee is the highest body, when in fact the Congress is the one that has the power to approve and announce nominations for the presidency.”
“The people of SYRIZA fight every day for democratic values both in the country and in the party.
Despite efforts by specific decision-making centers, voters understand that the restoration of the democratic process can only be achieved through Congress.
In addition, it is important to recall that Stefanos Kasselakis, with complete transparency, has submitted his file on time, accompanied by 87 signatures of members of the Central Committee. The file also includes his whereabouts, which was posted on the SYRIZA website.
The hour of truth is approaching, and only through democratic processes can our party move forward. The overthrow of these replacement methods is now imperative, as unity and democracy must be the pillars of our course”, they conclude.
#Congress #power #approve #nominations
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Eleni Dimitriou on the SYRIZA Leadership Controversy**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Dimitriou. There’s been significant turmoil within SYRIZA regarding Stefanos Kasselakis’ candidacy and the recent accusations of anti-democratic practices. Could you provide us with some background on this situation?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** Certainly. The recent controversy stems from Kasselakis’ bid for the SYRIZA presidency, which has been met with resistance from certain factions within the party. Following the closure of nominations, Kasselakis’ supporters are claiming that the Central Committee is attempting to exclude him, alleging that this undermines democratic processes within the party.
**Editor:** The term “fire” has been used to describe the ongoing tensions. What does this specifically refer to?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** The “fire” signifies the renewed criticisms directed towards the faction known as the “87,” who are seen as elitist and anti-democratic for their role in the nomination process. They argue that Kasselakis’ candidacy should be disregarded, whilst his camp is pushing back, asserting that the final say resides with the Congress, not the Central Committee.
**Editor:** So, will we see a confrontation at the Congress regarding his exclusion?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** It seems likely. The supporters of Kasselakis are rallying for a chance to reverse the decision. They believe that a strong presence at the Congress could possibly sway opinions and challenge the narrative set by the opposing factions.
**Editor:** What implications could this ongoing conflict have for SYRIZA’s future?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** This conflict could lead to a significant division within SYRIZA if not handled carefully. A failure to unite could weaken the party’s position in the larger political arena, especially against their rivals. Additionally, the manner in which this leadership battle is resolved could either revitalize or further fracture the party’s base.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Dimitriou, for your insights on this critical issue within SYRIZA.
**Dr. Dimitriou:** Thank you for having me. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds in the coming days.
As the “87,” which is reportedly trying to maintain control over the party and inhibit Kasselakis’ candidacy for the presidency. It reflects the growing unrest among party members who feel that democratic values are being sidelined in favor of maintaining the status quo within SYRIZA. This is not just a personal struggle for Kasselakis; it embodies a larger battle for the heart and soul of the party itself.
**Editor:** Kasselakis’ supporters have made some serious allegations regarding the Central Committee’s actions. How credible are these claims of anti-democratic practices?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** The credibility of the claims largely hinges on the transparency and fairness of the nomination process. Kasselakis’ camp insists that they have adhered to all procedural requirements, including submitting the necessary documentation along with the backing of 87 signatures. If true, this puts pressure on the Central Committee to justify its actions. Moreover, if how they’ve conducted themselves can be proven to undermine democratic ideals, it could lead to a significant backlash from SYRIZA’s grassroots members and supporters.
**Editor:** There has been mention of a Congress having the ultimate authority in this matter. What role does the Congress play in the SYRIZA presidential elections?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** The Congress is indeed the highest decision-making body within SYRIZA and has the power to approve and announce nominations for the presidency. The crux of Kasselakis’ supporters’ argument is that by sidelining the Congress and asserting that the Central Committee holds more sway, the opposing faction is essentially contradicting the party’s own constitution. This conflict emphasizes not just an election concern but a fundamental dispute over the party’s governance and democratic integrity.
**Editor:** Lastly, what implications might this internal conflict have for SYRIZA’s future and its electoral prospects?
**Dr. Dimitriou:** The implications could be profound. If this dispute is not resolved democratically and transparently, it could lead to further fragmentation within the party. This would likely leave SYRIZA vulnerable to losing support among its base, as well as to its political opponents. However, if they can navigate these waters and unify behind democratic processes, it might energize the party and even attract new members who are passionate about reform and transparency. Ultimately, it’s a crossroads that could define SYRIZA’s identity and influence going forward.
**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Dr. Dimitriou. It’s clear this situation requires careful navigation for SYRIZA as they move ahead.
