2024-11-10 12:27:00
“If necessary, I will do it ten more times. They are not prepared for it” – this is how Vinicius Junior commented on the results of this year’s Ballon d’Or. The Brazilian was a sure candidate to win, but ultimately the main statuette went to Rodri. This angered many fans, as well as Real Madrid itself, which even boycotted the gala in Paris. A few days ago, the voting results were revealed. Thanks to this, we found out how many points the Spaniard and Vinicius scored. We also learned about the choices of individual journalists. And these caused a lot of controversy.
The journalist explains his reasons for voting for the Ballon d’Or. He made a shocking decision
According to foreign media, three journalists did not name Vinicius in the TOP 10. These are Juha Kanerva from Finland, Bruno Porzio from El Salvador and Sheefeni Nikodemus from Namibia. Such choices of media representatives received wide coverage on the Internet. As reported by the Catalan “Sport”, they received a lot of criticism. Threats were also allegedly directed against them.
And finally one of the journalists commented on the matter. We’re talking about Kanerva. The Finn tried to explain why Vinicius was not included in the lead. “It was my technical error,” he admitted briefly, but he didn’t end there. He made a rather radical decision, which he announced on X. “I will resign from my place on the Ballon d’Or jury,” we read. If he keeps his word, he will not decide on the results of this prestigious award next year.
Storm on the Internet
The journalist’s short statement was immediately full of negative comments. Many Internet users laughed at the rather laconic entry. “Be honest”, “Do you in Finland even know what football is?” – they wrote mockingly. Others demanded detailed explanations of what actually happened and what the technical error was. So far, the Finn has not answered the questions.
And although less than two weeks have passed since the Ballon d’Or was awarded, the echoes are still there. The atmosphere is heightened not only by the media, but also by the players themselves. Recently, the winner put a pin on Real and Vinicius.
– What do you want me to tell you? That I would prefer everyone to be present? Of course. The second, third, fourth, etc. were missing. We want all the best players in the world to perform at such an evening. But I have to respect everyone’s decision, even if I didn’t behave the same way – said Rodri bluntly about the boycott of the gala in Paris by Real players.
1731243509
#cesspool #broke #votes #revealed #resign #Ballon #dOr #jury
**Interview with Sports Journalist Maria Gonzalez: Analyzing the Ballon d’Or Controversy**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Maria. Let’s dive right into the recent Ballon d’Or results. Vinicius Junior expressed his thoughts by saying he would repeat his efforts “ten more times” despite not winning. What are your thoughts on his reaction?
**Maria Gonzalez:** Thanks for having me! Vinicius’s reaction shows both his passion and disappointment. He was certainly a top candidate this year, and I think it speaks to the competitive nature of these awards. His resolve suggests he is determined not to let this setback define him, which is very commendable.
**Interviewer:** The voting results also revealed that three journalists did not include Vinicius in their top ten. Can you give us insight into this decision?
**Maria Gonzalez:** Absolutely. The decisions of Juha Kanerva, Bruno Porzio, and Sheefeni Nikodemus to omit Vinicius have sparked significant backlash. In their defense, every journalist has their criteria for judging player performances, but this particular choice has generated a lot of debate. It highlights how subjective football awards can be and how varied the perspectives can be based on personal biases or national allegiance.
**Interviewer:** Many fans criticized these journalists heavily online, and some even directed threats towards them. Is this a concerning trend in sports commentary?
**Maria Gonzalez:** It is indeed troubling. While it’s natural for fans to feel passionate about their favorite players, resorting to threats is completely unacceptable. Criticism should focus on their expertise and decision-making rather than personal attacks. This situation emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue in sports and the importance of ensuring a safer environment for journalists who cover these topics.
**Interviewer:** Real Madrid boycotted the gala in Paris over the results. What does this say about the relationship between the club and major football awards?
**Maria Gonzalez:** The boycott signifies the club’s dissatisfaction with the award process, particularly how it may overshadow their player’s achievements. Real Madrid wants recognition for their players’ talents—and rightfully so, considering their contributions to the sport. This also raises questions about the fairness of award processes and the criteria used for voting.
**Interviewer:** As we look ahead, how do you think this controversy will shape future decisions in player awards?
**Maria Gonzalez:** I believe it will prompt more transparency in the voting process and encourage journalists to have robust discussions regarding their criteria. This incident could be a catalyst for change as the football world is increasingly calling for fairness and recognition where it’s due. Ultimately, the focus should be on elevating the game and acknowledging talent consistently.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Maria, for your insights on this developing story. It’s clear that discussions surrounding the Ballon d’Or are far from over!
**Maria Gonzalez:** Thank you! It’s a pleasure to discuss these important topics, and I look forward to seeing how the conversation unfolds in the future.