A. Kandrotas appealed to the CEC towards the choice of fee member Andriaus Vaišnis dated December 15, which refused to register A. Kandrotas to take part in a political marketing campaign.
A. Vaišnys made such a call as a result of A. Kandrotas didn’t submit a doc in regards to the checking account opened in his title, which shall be used as an account for the election political marketing campaign. As an alternative, the applicant submitted to the CEC a common settlement for fee providers with Paysera, which doesn’t have a financial institution license.
A. Kandrots argued through the fee assembly that the Election Code defines the chances of candidates to carry out monetary transactions in a different way and it’s attainable on the expense of “Paysera”, however the fee said that the submitted paperwork don’t meet the necessities.
If the CEC rejects A. Kandrot’s criticism, he’ll have the ability to attraction it to the Supreme Administrative Court docket of Lithuania. The Kaunian already complained to the Administrative Court docket of Areas regarding his non-registration, however the courtroom didn’t settle for the criticism, as it’s not inside its competence.
Complaints regarding CEC choices are examined by the Supreme Administrative Court docket of Lithuania. A. Kandrotas needed to attraction the fee member’s choice to not register him as a political marketing campaign participant to the fee itself, and its choice will be appealed to LVAT.
On Thursday, for a similar causes, the fee refused to register A. Kandrotas as a participant within the presidential political marketing campaign once more.
A. Kandrots is on trial within the case of riots close to the Seimas.
#CEC #rejected #Kandrots #criticism #registered #take part #presidential #elections
2024-06-24 02:53:32
