Muhammad Kno entered the free period of his contract with Al Hilal, which allows him to sign with any other club in early January. On the second day of the new year, he was sitting next to his agent and director of the “Sportyard” company that runs his business, and Abdullah Al-Turki, director of professionalism at Al-Nasr Club.
All parties agreed verbally at the beginning, and then Kno signed an eight-page contract with a fingerprint on each page. After the Saudi Super Cup match between Al Hilal and Al Faisaly on the sixth of last January.
On January 3, Al-Nasr sent a copy of the contract to the Professional Committee of the Saudi Football Association, and after 4 days and conflicting news circulating about the player’s future, Kanoo joined the list of Al-Hilal and Al-Faisaly match and won the Super Cup with Al-Azraq.
After the coronation, the cameras spotted Kno crying, and a member of the board of directors, Fahd Al-Mafraj, trying to calm him down. The club’s management has begun its legal procedures regarding the player’s contract, Mohamed Kno.
Ten days later, the Professional Committee and his agent were summoned to listen to their statements, then sent the next day to the player and his agent additional inquiries to respond to them via e-mail, and on the twenty-fourth of January, the Professional Committee summoned from Al-Nasr Ahmed Al-Ghamdi, CEO, Abdullah Al-Turki, Professional Director and from Al-Hilal Abdul Allah Al-Jarbou, CEO, and Fahd Al-Mafraj, Executive Director of Football, and the committee asked the two clubs to increase it with all papers and documents.
Before the eighth session, which was scheduled for Lucknow, after his return from the national team camp, the Professional Committee was surprised by a complaint from the player through his lawyer against Al-Nasr Club, and the news indicates that the lawyer relied on the fact that Al-Asfar negotiated with the player during the validity of his contract.
On the sixteenth of February, the Professionalism Committee issued a two-page statement, in which it relied on a number of legal articles, in what were understood as letters addressed to the parties to the case.