Brasilia, Nov 13 (EFE).- The Brazilian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mauro Vieira, stated this Wednesday in an appearance in Congress that, despite the clear deterioration of Brazil‘s relations with Venezuela, the current moment has to be one of dialogue and not to break relations with the neighboring country.
“Although circumstances impose an inevitable decrease in the dynamism of relations, that does not mean that Brazil has to break relations with Venezuela or something of that nature,” said the chancellor in reference to Caracas’ recent decision to recall its ambassador. in Brasilia for consultations.
Vieira added that the Venezuelan ambassador was not permanently removed from the country, that the Brazilian ambassador in Caracas remains in her position and has very good relations with the Venezuelan authorities, and that he himself continues to maintain contacts with his counterpart from the neighboring country.
“On the contrary, the current moment is one of dialogue, negotiation and non-isolation, which are key to a peaceful solution to the crisis in Venezuela,” he assured.
Relations began to deteriorate since the presidential elections last July because the Government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva did not recognize the victory granted by the Venezuelan electoral body to President Nicolás Maduro, and they worsened in October when Brazil vetoed Venezuela’s entry. to the BRICS as a full member after the bloc’s summit held in Russia.
Since then, different Venezuelan authorities have harshly criticized Lula.
Vieira said that Brazil is not obliged to recognize Maduro’s supposed victory in the presidential elections because, by tradition, the country does not recognize governments but states.
«The current moment is delicate and requires professionalism and caution from diplomacy. Brazil’s practice is to recognize States and not governments. It is a tradition that seeks to avoid the politicization of the recognition or non-recognition of a foreign Government,” he assured.
According to the chancellor, Brazil has insisted on dialogue with Venezuela and other countries about the Venezuelan crisis not only because it is an important neighbor but also because it was guarantor of the Barbados Agreement, in which the Government and opposition defined the bases for the elections of this year, and because, at Maduro’s invitation, he was an election observer.
He added, however, that the solution to the crisis has to be “constructed” by the Venezuelans themselves and not imposed from outside with more sanctions and isolation.
«We already saw that that does not work. We cannot repeat the mistakes of the time when Juan Guaidó was proclaimed interim president. There were two presidents, but one only had a title and did not have a country to govern,” he said.
“That has nothing to do with interference or recognition of something political but rather the needs of a relationship,” he said.
.
#Brazilian #foreign #minister #current #moment #demands #dialogue #break #Venezuela
What are the implications of Brazil’s diplomatic stance on Venezuela for regional stability in Latin America?
**Interview with Dr. Luciana Costa, Latin American Relations Expert**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Costa. Recently, Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira emphasized the importance of maintaining dialogue with Venezuela despite strained relations. What are your thoughts on his stance?
**Dr. Costa:** Thank you for having me. I believe Minister Vieira’s position is pragmatic. Given the historical context of Brazil and Venezuela’s relationship, dialogue is crucial. Although tensions have escalated in recent months, entirely severing ties could lead to increased isolation for both nations, which would be detrimental, especially considering the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela.
**Editor:** Vieira mentioned the necessity for negotiations and non-isolation during this tumultuous period. In your opinion, what form could this dialogue take?
**Dr. Costa:** Dialogue can manifest in various ways, from diplomatic communications to multilateral discussions involving regional organizations. Economic cooperation initiatives, even on a limited scale, could be potential starting points for rebuilding trust. The goal should be to foster an environment where both countries can address mutual concerns without the backdrop of hostility.
**Editor:** The recent political developments have certainly heightened tensions. How might Brazil’s decision to veto Venezuela’s entry into BRICS impact future relations?
**Dr. Costa:** The veto was a significant political statement by Brazil, reflecting its stance on democratic values and electoral integrity. While this may have momentarily strained relations, it also positions Brazil as a country willing to stand firm on such principles. The challenge will be finding a balance between upholding these values and pursuing diplomatic engagement.
**Editor:** What are the potential risks if Brazil chooses to ignore Minister Vieira’s call for dialogue?
**Dr. Costa:** Ignoring the call for dialogue risks exacerbating the current crisis. It could lead to a further breakdown of communication, making it harder to address pressing issues like the migration crisis and trade gaps. Moreover, isolation could empower hardline factions within Venezuela, making reconciliation more challenging in the long run.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Costa, for sharing your insights on this complex issue. Your expertise helps shed light on the importance of dialogue in international relations.
**Dr. Costa:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep this dialogue alive and promote understanding between nations, even in challenging times.
