2023-05-23 04:29:01
The journalist César Hildebrandt considered that the Boluarte government had massacred human rights. Photo: composition LR
The journalist César Hildebrandt spoke regarding the response given by the Prime Minister of In Boluarte, Alberto Otárola, who questioned the speech of the Ombudsman, Josué Gutiérrez, when telling him that “human rights might not be redefined, because they are dogmatic.” Given this, Hildebrandt specified that Otárola’s idea was wrong and the Government would have achieved that goal and more, since he specified that for the Executive, human rights “are redefined, mocked, bloodied, massacred.”
Regarding this case, the journalist asserted in his podcast this Monday: “Of course they redefine themselves, Mr. Otárola, they not only redefine themselves, they mock, they bloody, they massacre. Look at you, 60 dead, you were Minister of Defense, now He is prime minister. And the investigations, nothing. And the prosecution, very little. And you, not a word.”
“So, yes, if they are redefined, in practice they are redefined every day, because dogma is one thing, appearance is one thing, canonical phrasing is one thing, and factual respect for rights is another thing. human rights, and you don’t respect human rights,” insisted Hildebrandt in response to the statements by the head of the PCM.
On the ruling of the Judiciary that endangers the right to protest: “They provide good services to Benavides, Boluarte and Otárola”
On the other hand, the journalist insisted that the decision taken by the Judiciary that puts citizens’ ability to protest on alert is “a ruling that makes protest very difficult because it openly criminalizes it. Given this ruling and the jurisprudence that implies, this does criminalize protest”.
In this sense, he asserted that the right is happy, and his actions suggest that he is telling the population “since I don’t want to continue killing you, I am going to prevent you from demonstrating.” “So, César San Martín, who provided such good services to the BCP, now provides good services to the Government of Mrs. Benavides, Mrs. Boluarte and Mr. Otárola, and says: ‘Be careful with the protest, because all violence is criminal ‘”, he claimed.
For the press man, “the protest is going to become a potentially criminal act.” “They think that this is how they are going to stop the indignation, well, let them continue to believe it, but is there talk of violence? Isn’t a State that steals violent? A State that falsifies? Isn’t a State violent with this Congress, with this lady president, with this prime minister? Isn’t it pure and hard violence what they give us daily? Impunity, lack of control, misgovernment. Isn’t it violence that the poor suffer, who are subjected? Isn’t it violence to kill fifty and so many people in the span of two weeks and then hide the criminals behind various and innumerable paperwork? Isn’t that violence?” he asked.
“There is talk of popular violence. Well, yes, with that criterion there would never have been a French Revolution, with that criterion the United States would continue to be a British dependency, and with that criterion the viceroys would come from Toledo or Catalonia,” the journalist concluded.
1684838419
#César #Hildebrandt #Alberto #Otárolas #response #Ombudsman #respect #human #rights #Joshua #Gutierrez #news #Present
