2024-01-05 20:55:00
Judge Enrique Lavie Picoof the Federal Administrative Litigation Court No. 6, gave rise to an amparo action presented by the president of the Argentine Federation of Municipalities (FAM), Fernando Espinoza once morest the Decree of Necessity and Urgency of Javier Miley. The communal chief of La Matanza, representing some 500 mayors from across the country, wants to declare the “unconstitutionality” of the rule.
Among the mayors who accompanied Espinoza were Peronist municipal leaders such as July Winefrom La Plata; Damian Selciby Hurlingham; Lucas Guifrom Morón; Juan Jose Mussi, by Berazategui; and Mayra Mendozafrom Quilmes.
A judge received an increase in the prepaid rate, sued the company and went once morest Milei’s DNU
The action had been filed on January 2. That day, the mayor of La Matanza assured: “We understand that the Government’s policies negatively affect in multiple ways, in principle the neighbors that all the mayors of the country represent, internal commerce and the national industry, privatizes indiscriminately , eliminates public works, destroys the Mobility Law that establishes the increase in pensions every three months and dictates many more unconstitutional measures that harm the people, regional economies, national sovereignty and violates countless acquired rights.
Espinoza also stressed that “just days following Milei took office, a before and following has already been generated in Argentina. We see how Argentines are falling out of the labor system and how a collapse of the economic power of the entire people is being generated.” .
The DNU arrived at Congress
Judge Lavié Pico’s decision was known on the same day that the Executive Branch sent the mega DNU to Congress. Even though it is already in force and judicial filings once morest it are accumulating, from now on it will be the legislators who will have to deal with it.
The government got into the judicial fight over the DNU and the CGT demand will be dealt with in Litigation
The bicameral Legislative Procedure commission, which has not yet been formed, will have 10 days to issue an opinion and send the DNU to the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate for debate.
According to current legislation, it is enough for only one of the chambers to approve it for it to continue in force. For the DNU to be rejected, an aggravated majority is required (the vote once morest half plus one of the legislators).
GL CP
1704489459
#Administrative #Litigation #proceeded #amparo #DNU #presented #mayors
