The Zagazig Criminal Court decided, during the second session of the trial of the accused of killing the student “Salma”, known in the media as the Sharkia Girl, who was killed following she sustained 31 separate stab wounds all over the body by a colleague at the university, according to the anatomical report. The accused was placed in a disease hospital. Mental and psychological status for a month, preparing a report on his psychological condition, and considering the invitation on the 3rd of next October.
The Zagazig Criminal Court heard, before it was said, during the second session of the trial of the accused of killing the student “Salma” known in the media as the Sharkia girl, who was killed following being stabbed with 31 separate stab wounds all over the body by a colleague at the university, according to what was stated in the anatomical report, to the Director The administrative director of the hospital specialized in psychiatric treatment, in which the accused was treated in 2019.
The session was adjourned following hearing the administrative director of the hospital, pending its decision shortly.
Today, the vicinity of the Zagazig Criminal Court witnessed intense security measures before the start of the trial of the accused of killing “Salma Bahgat”, the Zagazig girl. Farouk and Ahmed Ghareeb, this morning, Tuesday, the second session of the trial of the accused of killing the student “Salma” known in the media as the Zagazig girl, who was killed following she was stabbed 31 separate all over the body by a colleague at the university, according to the report of the anatomical character.
The events of Case No. 7730 of 2022 Criminal Division of Zagazig First Division date back to August 8, when the security services received a report from the Police Rescue Service, of the death of a girl at the entrance to a residential property in the Zagazig First Division. The accused and referred to the Public Prosecution, which referred him imprisoned to the Zagazig Criminal Court.
The referral order stated that the Public Prosecution referred the accused, “Islam Muhammad Fathi Mustafa Tartour”, who deliberately killed the victim, Salma Bahgat Muhammad Mahmoud, with premeditation and premeditation, that the intention was to kill her because of her reluctance to associate with him, and the failure of his multiple attempts to force her to do so. He laid out a plan to kill her, during which time she would go back to the property where the incident occurred, and for this purpose he prepared a white weapon, a knife, and lay hidden in one of the corners of the entrance to that property, waiting for her. As indicated in the investigations, he seized a white weapon, a knife, without legal justification, as indicated in the investigations. Accordingly, the accused had committed a felony or misdemeanour in Articles 230, 231, 232 of the Penal Code and Articles A/2501, bis/3001/1 of Law No. 394 For the year 1954 amended by Laws No. 26 of 1978, 165 of 1981, 5 of 2019 and Item No. 6 of Table No. (1) attached to the first law and amended by the Minister of Interior Decree No. 1756 of 2007, therefore, and following reviewing the text of Article 214 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or The Public Prosecution decided to refer the case to the competent Zagazig Criminal Court in the Mansoura Court of Appeals to punish the accused in accordance with the referral order and the attached list of evidence, while continuing to imprison the accused pending criminal trial..
In the statements of the first witness in the case, who linked her to a friendship relationship with the victim, because she had previously trained together in the newspaper located in the property in the crime, and that she was aware of the existence of an emotional relationship between the victim and the accused, and on a date prior to the incident, the victim called her because she was going through psychological distress, so I asked her to come to her to talk to her and take her out From that case, she agreed to that, and the accused had previously contacted her to check on the victim following he had failed to communicate directly with her.
On the day prior to the incident, I was surprised by the defendant’s contact with her claiming that he was reassuring the victim, so she informed him of the latter’s presence in the newspaper where she was trained on the day of the incident. Holding a white weapon “knife”, he assaulted the victim and stabbed her several times in the body, which terrified her, and she screamed and climbed up the newspaper for distress.
