The 33-year-old accused of the explosion at Vineyardsgot a new deadline to apologize tomorrow at 16.00. According to the doctors’ certificate, he is unable to speak for more than a few minutes. Tomorrow, the investigator will go to Evangelismos again to receive the 33-year-old’s statement.
The woman, who at noon on October 31st was in the apartment on the third floor of Arkadias Street, where the explosion took place, remains hospitalized at Evangelismos Hospital. Her lawyer said she is still medically unable to testify. He can’t speak very well. The investigator, however, who is handling the case decided that she must visit her today and she is expected to do so in order to receive a statement.
Two people have already been remanded in custody for the case, a 31-year-old man and his 30-year-old girlfriend who returned from abroad, while the investigations of the Anti-Terrorist Office are in full progress for the terrorist cell of Ampelokipi.
Regarding the major damages suffered by the apartment building, it was found that a total of six apartments were deemed unsuitable, while three of them on the third floor are in a very bad condition.
The question is whether there will be any compensation, as this is an accident and not an act of terrorism for which responsibility has been claimed.
#33yearold #accused #treated #Evangelismos #received #deadline #apologize
**Interview with Legal Expert, Dr. Maria Kourouklis**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us, Dr. Kourouklis. Given the circumstances surrounding the explosion at Vineyards and the upcoming deadline for the accused to apologize, what do you think the implications are for both the accused and the victims?
**Dr. Kourouklis**: The situation is quite complex. For the 33-year-old accused, this deadline to apologize signifies a crucial moment in the legal process. His inability to speak for extended periods due to health issues raises questions about the integrity of any statement he may provide. It’s a delicate balance between ensuring justice is served and protecting the rights of the accused.
**Interviewer**: And what about the woman in the apartment who remains hospitalized? With her lawyer stating she is also unable to testify, how does this affect the investigation?
**Dr. Kourouklis**: The fact that the woman is not in a position to give her account complicates matters significantly. Her perspective is vital in understanding the incident, but the investigator’s decision to visit her speaks to the urgency of obtaining every possible detail. However, if she’s not able to comprehend or articulate the events clearly, the effectiveness of that testimony may be limited.
**Interviewer**: We are hearing conflicting reports about whether this incident will be treated as an accident or if it has elements of terrorism. What’s your take on how this will influence potential compensation for the victims?
**Dr. Kourouklis**: This is where the conversation becomes particularly contentious. If classified as an accident, victims may struggle to receive compensation, as liability might not lie with any party in a formal sense. Conversely, if indexed to terrorism, it could open up avenues for compensation through state mechanisms. The difficulty lies in public perception—should an apology come from the accused, could that shift how people view the nature of this incident?
**Interviewer**: It’s clear there’s a lot at stake. For our readers, do you think the justice system is adequately addressing the complexities of this case, or are there flaws that need to be addressed?
**Dr. Kourouklis**: That’s a question that invites a spirited debate. Many may feel that the system often prioritizes procedural aspects over the emotional and social ramifications for victims. Alternatively, others might argue that due process is essential in ensuring a fair verdict for the accused. How the public perceives this case might ultimately shine a light on broader systemic issues within our legal framework. What do you think? Should the system lean more towards protecting victims or ensuring fair trials for the accused?
