The latest episode of “Tash” titled “Migration of Men” had several contradictions. These contradictions raise questions and suggest that the idea behind the episode is empty and lacking in substance. The episode portrayed a female conquest of land by eliminating men in a humorous manner, but this was not well executed.
The writing team or text workshop of “Tash” seem to have neglected a defect in the program’s previous episode. The episode titled “content seller” harshly criticized social media influencers, including some of the celebrities who appeared in the latest episode. This scene reveals that the program’s creators only focus on presenting their ideas without considering the viewers’ expectations for dramatic content.
The arts should reflect the civilization and awareness of peoples and give a clear conception of their social status. However, by exploiting and misleading viewers with empty comedy, “Tash” might be flattening the mental capacity of its audience. This approach disregards the collective consciousness of the local community in the Kingdom and the Gulf.
Tonight’s “Tash” episode, “Migration of Men,” came out with a number of contradictions, which prompt a critical door to open the way for questions, especially since the contradiction is considered “scandalous” and not hidden, but rather gives indications of the emptiness of the idea from the slightest dramatic monotony.
The intended contradiction in the episode, which simulated a female conquest of the land, at the expense of eliminating the man, in a humorous manner, lacks content and causes for the idea.
He neglected the “writing” team in Tash, or the text workshop, regarding a defect in the course of the program’s episodes, as last Monday’s episode contained harsh criticism of the so-called “famous” social media, which was titled “content seller”, While the heroes from tonight’s episode were among the “celebrities” who were criticized a few days ago.
In that scene, two things become clear. The first: Approaching the presentation of the product in a way that simulates “filling the void”, without regard to the dramatic content that everyone is waiting for. The second: flattening the mentality and mentality of the viewer, and imagining that he does not rise to being an observer who is good at distinguishing between chaff and fat. The arts, in their entirety, are considered among the images that reflect the civilization and awareness of peoples, and give a clear conception of the social status of peoples, whether they are conscious, or “passing” operations can be performed on the minds of their members, without giving the slightest regard to the collective consciousness, which has become the local community in the Kingdom. And the Gulf, at the very least, lives it and proceeds within its framework. This might fall under the framework of exploiting and misleading the viewer with “empty comedy”.
In conclusion, the latest episode of “Tash” has brought to light some concerning contradictions and shortcomings in the program’s approach towards drama and comedy. The shallow and vacuous nature of the comedic content is worrisome, especially when it comes at the expense of critical thinking and meaningful storytelling. The show’s failure to address the previous week’s critique of social media influencers only adds to the sense of disconnect and insensitivity towards the audience’s intelligence. As viewers, it is important to hold programs like “Tash” accountable for their choices and challenge them to raise the bar when it comes to artistic expression and societal reflection.
