Home » IT » Page 13

Samsung‘s Tizen OS Support Ends: What This Means for Your Smartwatch

Samsung is preparing to discontinue support for its Tizen operating system on smartwatches, marking a definitive shift towards Google’s Wear OS. This change, initially signaled in 2021 with the merger of Tizen and Wear OS development, will fully take effect on September 30, 2025. The closure of the Tizen Store on this date will prevent users from installing new applications via their smartphones.

The End of an Era for Tizen

For years, Tizen powered a range of Samsung’s smart devices, notably its Galaxy smartwatch line. However, the company has transitioned its newer Galaxy smartwatches to Wear OS, gradually phasing out Tizen. The impending closure of the tizen Store represents the final stage of this process. Since June 25, 2025, the store has ceased sales of all free content, already impacting user access to downloadable watch faces.

What Happens After September 30, 2025?

After the September deadline, existing Tizen-powered smartwatches will continue to function, but owners will no longer be able to reinstall previously deleted apps. Crucially, no further updates will be released for either the operating system itself or the applications running on it. This means users will be locked into the current software versions, possibly missing out on bug fixes and security patches.

Affected Devices

The following Samsung smartwatches are affected by the end of Tizen support:

Model Operating System
Galaxy Gear Tizen
Gear 2 Tizen
Gear Live Tizen
Gear S Tizen
Gear S2 Tizen
Gear S3 Tizen
Gear Sport Tizen
Galaxy Watch Tizen
Galaxy Watch active Tizen
Galaxy Watch Active 2 tizen
galaxy Watch 3 Tizen

did You Know? Samsung initially developed Tizen as a direct competitor to Android and iOS, aiming to create a more open and versatile mobile operating system.

Potential Workarounds and Solutions

While official support is ending, dedicated users have explored methods for preserving Tizen apps. Several online communities, such as Reddit and the XDA Developers forum, have shared procedures for backing up and restoring applications. Some methods require root access on your smartphone, while others offer no-root solutions, specifically for devices like the Galaxy Watch Active 2. These resources provide instructions for extracting app packages and watch faces before the Tizen Store closes.

Pro Tip: Regularly back up any essential watch faces or apps you rely on before September 30, 2025, as they may become inaccessible afterward.

The Shift to Wear OS: A Broader Context

Samsung’s move to Wear OS represents a larger trend in the smartwatch industry. Google’s Wear OS has seen notable improvements in recent years, notably with the introduction of Wear OS 3 and subsequent updates. This has led to greater app compatibility and a more streamlined user experience. The collaboration between Samsung and Google allows for a unified platform, leveraging the strengths of both companies. The future of smartwatch technology points toward increased integration with broader ecosystems, and Wear OS is positioned to be a key player in that evolution.

Frequently Asked Questions about Tizen Support


Are you a long-time Tizen smartwatch user? what are your thoughts on this transition? Share your experiences and concerns in the comments below!

What steps should Galaxy watch owners take now to prepare for the end of Tizen support?

Samsung Announces End of Tizen Support for Smartwatches in Four Weeks

What Does This Mean for Samsung Galaxy Watch Owners?

Samsung has officially announced the end of support for its Tizen-based smartwatches in approximately four weeks,as of August 30,2025. This marks a important shift for users of older Galaxy Watch models, specifically those running the Tizen operating system. The move comes as Samsung fully transitions to Wear OS, powered by Google, for its newer smartwatch lineup, beginning with the galaxy Watch 4. This article details what this change entails, which devices are affected, and what options are available to Galaxy Watch owners.

Affected Devices: A Extensive List

The following Samsung Galaxy Watch models will no longer receive software updates or new features after the four-week period:

galaxy Watch: (Original)

Galaxy Watch Active:

Galaxy Watch Active2:

Galaxy Watch3:

Galaxy Watch3 LTE:

These devices will continue to function as standard timepieces and may still offer basic functionalities, but core smartwatch features reliant on server-side support or software updates will gradually become limited.

key Features Impacted by the tizen Sunset

Several key features will be affected by the end of Tizen support. Users can expect the following:

App Availability: No new apps will be added to the Galaxy Store for Tizen smartwatches. Existing apps should continue to function, but updates are unlikely.

Software Updates: critical security patches and bug fixes will cease, potentially leaving devices vulnerable.

Samsung Health Integration: While core health tracking may continue, full integration with newer Samsung Health features and services will be limited.

Bixby Functionality: Bixby voice assistant functionality may degrade over time as server-side support diminishes.

Map Updates: Map data within apps like Samsung Maps will become outdated.

The Transition to Wear OS: What to Expect

Samsung’s move to Wear OS represents a significant upgrade in terms of app ecosystem and features. Wear OS offers:

Google Play Store Access: A vastly larger app library compared to the Galaxy Store.

Google Assistant Integration: Seamless integration with Google’s powerful voice assistant.

Improved Performance: Wear OS, particularly on newer Samsung hardware, generally offers smoother performance.

Enhanced Features: Access to features like Google Maps, Google Wallet, and more.

However, it’s significant to note that transitioning requires upgrading to a newer Galaxy Watch model (Watch 4 or later). There is no official path to upgrade existing Tizen watches to Wear OS.

What are Your Options?

Galaxy Watch owners facing the end of tizen support have several options:

  1. Upgrade to a Wear OS Galaxy Watch: The most straightforward solution is to purchase a newer Galaxy Watch model running Wear OS (Galaxy Watch 4,5,or 6). This ensures continued access to the latest features, security updates, and app ecosystem.
  2. Continue Using Your Tizen Watch (with Limitations): Your watch will still function as a basic smartwatch, but be aware of the limitations outlined above.
  3. Explore Third-Party smartwatches: Consider switching to a smartwatch from another manufacturer running Wear OS or another compatible operating system.
  4. Consider Trade-In Programs: Samsung frequently offers trade-in programs that can help offset the cost of upgrading to a newer model. Check the Samsung website for current promotions.

Tizen’s Legacy and Future Development

While Samsung is ending support for Tizen on smartwatches, the operating system isn’t entirely disappearing. Tizen continues to power a range of Samsung appliances and smart TVs. Recent documentation (Tizen 9.0 M2 Release – https://docs.tizen.org/platform/release-notes/tizen-9-0-m2/) indicates ongoing development and improvements to the OS for these other applications, including advancements in OS upgrade and delta image automation. This suggests Tizen will remain a relevant platform within Samsung’s broader ecosystem, just not for wrist-worn devices.

Preparing for the Change: practical Tips

Back Up Your Data: Before the end of support,back up any important data from your Galaxy Watch to the Samsung cloud or your smartphone.

Download Essential Apps: Download and install any essential apps from the Galaxy Store now, as no new apps will be added.

Review App Permissions: Check the permissions granted to apps on your watch and revoke any unneeded access.

consider a Factory Reset: If you plan to continue using your Tizen watch, a factory reset can help optimize performance.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Meta’s $Millions in California: A Forewarning of the AI Regulation Wars

By 2026, the battleground for artificial intelligence regulation won’t just be Washington D.C. – it will be Sacramento. Meta’s newly formed “Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California” PAC, backed by a double-digit million dollar investment, signals a dramatic escalation in corporate efforts to shape the future of AI rules, and it’s a strategy other tech giants are already deploying.

The California Crucible: Why AI Regulation is Heating Up

California is rapidly becoming the focal point for US tech regulation. Driven by public concern over data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential societal impacts of AI, state legislators are actively considering comprehensive laws governing these technologies. These proposed regulations aren’t simply tweaks; they could fundamentally alter how companies like Meta develop and deploy AI-powered products, impacting everything from content moderation to targeted advertising. The stakes are incredibly high, and Meta is clearly betting that influencing the political landscape is a more effective strategy than passively accepting potentially restrictive rules.

PACs: The New Normal for Tech Lobbying

Political Action Committees (PACs) are a long-established feature of the American political system, allowing corporations and interest groups to financially support candidates who align with their objectives. Meta’s move isn’t groundbreaking in its use of a PAC, but the scale of the planned investment – and the explicit focus on AI regulation – is noteworthy. Companies like Uber and Airbnb have previously utilized similar strategies in California, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in influencing policy decisions. This isn’t about simply donating to campaigns; it’s about building relationships, funding targeted advertising, and shaping the narrative around key issues.

Beyond California: The Ripple Effect of AI Regulation

What happens in California rarely stays in California. Given the state’s economic size and its position as a global technology hub, any significant AI regulations passed there are likely to serve as a model for other states – and potentially even the federal government. This is precisely what Meta is trying to prevent. A more lenient regulatory environment in California would not only benefit Meta directly but could also create a more favorable landscape for AI innovation across the US. However, this approach raises critical questions about the balance between fostering innovation and protecting consumers.

The Core Concerns: Transparency, Security, and Consumer Protection

California lawmakers are focusing on three key areas of AI regulation: transparency, security, and consumer protection. Transparency demands that companies disclose how their AI systems work and how they use data. Security focuses on preventing malicious use of AI, such as deepfakes and automated disinformation campaigns. Consumer protection aims to safeguard individuals from algorithmic bias and unfair or discriminatory practices. These are legitimate concerns, and addressing them is crucial for building public trust in AI. The challenge lies in finding the right balance between regulation and innovation – a balance Meta clearly believes it can influence.

The Future of AI Governance: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach?

Meta’s aggressive lobbying efforts highlight a fundamental tension in the emerging landscape of AI governance. While companies understandably want to protect their investments and maintain flexibility, policymakers have a responsibility to safeguard the public interest. A truly effective approach will require a multi-stakeholder dialogue involving government, industry, academia, and civil society organizations. Simply throwing money at political campaigns is unlikely to be a sustainable solution in the long run.

The coming years will be pivotal in shaping the future of AI. California’s decisions will have far-reaching consequences, and Meta’s actions are a clear indication that the fight for control over AI regulation is just beginning. The question isn’t whether AI will be regulated, but how it will be regulated – and who will have the loudest voice in that process. What role will ethical considerations play alongside economic incentives? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
<h1>AI Revolutionizes Teamwork: Agile Methods Face Disruption – Breaking News</h1>
<p><b>Nuremberg, Germany – November 21, 2024</b> – A seismic shift is underway in the world of project management and software development as generative AI tools begin to fundamentally alter how teams collaborate. New research, unveiled at the Ki-Navigator conference in Nuremberg, reveals that while agile methodologies like Scrum remain valuable, they are facing unprecedented pressure to adapt to the realities of AI-driven workflows. This is a developing story with significant implications for businesses across all sectors.</p>

<img src="[Image Placeholder: AI and Teamwork Illustration]" alt="AI and Teamwork Illustration">
<p style="text-align: center;"><i>The rise of AI is prompting a re-evaluation of traditional teamwork structures.</i></p>

<h2>The "Outsourcing Deluxe" Effect: AI Taking on Team Responsibilities</h2>

<p>Generative AI isn’t just assisting with tasks; it’s poised to take over entire areas of responsibility within teams. Experts predict intelligent agents will soon be capable of assigning tasks based on expertise, deriving next steps from discussions, and even autonomously generating software tests. Dr. Konstantin Hopf, head of the Data Analytics Research Group at the University of Bamberg, describes this as “Outsourcing Deluxe,” highlighting the potential for AI to surpass human capabilities in certain areas. This isn’t about replacing people, but about redefining roles and responsibilities.</p>

<h2>Why Agile is Feeling the Heat</h2>

<p>Agile methodologies, particularly Scrum, have long been lauded for their adaptability and iterative approach. However, the very nature of AI – its probabilistic models, evolving rules, and sometimes unpredictable outputs – challenges the core tenets of these methods.  Traditional sprint planning, focused on concrete features and efficiency, may become less relevant when dealing with AI systems that operate on exploration and experimentation.  The role of the Product Owner, traditionally responsible for defining requirements, is also evolving as AI-driven projects generate knowledge continuously.</p>

<h2>The Workshop Findings: Bridging the Gap Between Agility and Data Science</h2>

<p>A recent workshop, organized as part of the Ki-Navigator column and held at Qualityminds GmbH, brought together experts in agility and data science to address these challenges.  Over 30 participants engaged in a collaborative discussion, utilizing the 1-2-4 method to explore the intersection of AI and agile workflows. The discussion centered around two key areas: optimizing agile product development *with* AI, and adapting agile methods for developing AI-powered products themselves.</p>

<h3>Leveraging AI to Enhance Agile Development</h3>

<p>The workshop identified numerous opportunities to integrate AI into existing agile processes. From automating requirement analysis and generating code with AI copilots to streamlining CI/CD pipelines with AI-powered testing and infrastructure-as-code generation, the potential for increased efficiency is substantial.  A table outlining specific AI applications across the software development lifecycle (see below) provides a snapshot of these possibilities.</p>

<table>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th>Software Development Process</th>
            <th>AI Support (Examples)</th>
        </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>Requirement Analysis</td>
            <td>Generate ideas and mockups, transcription of meetings</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Planning and Analysis</td>
            <td>Backlog generation and analysis</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Design and Architecture</td>
            <td>Generation of architecture models, simulations and gap analyzes</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Implementation</td>
            <td>Copilots and vibe-coding</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>CI and Test</td>
            <td>Test-case generation, test facility, generation of infrastructure as code</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Review and Feedback</td>
            <td>AI agent for feedback (internal)</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Deployment</td>
            <td>Agents for infrastructure as code</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Monitoring and Maintenance</td>
            <td>AIOPS tools, incident prediction, chatbots for first-level support</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>User Feedback and Evaluation</td>
            <td>AI agent for feedback (external)</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Continuous Improvement</td>
            <td>Recommendation systems</td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<h3>Developing AI-Powered Products: A New Agile Paradigm</h3>

<p>The more significant challenge lies in developing products *with* AI at their core. These projects are characterized by large, unstructured datasets, hypothesis-driven development, and a focus on experimentation. Validating results is complex, as AI models are often evaluated as a whole, and intermediate results are less meaningful.  This requires a shift in mindset, moving away from rigid sprint goals and embracing a more exploratory, iterative approach.</p>

<h2>The Future of Agile in the Age of AI</h2>

<p>Jun.-Prof. Dr. Karoline Glaser of the Technical University of Dresden emphasizes that the integration of AI isn’t about discarding agile principles, but about adapting them.  Teams need to be prepared to improvise, to embrace ambiguity, and to prioritize continuous learning.  Daniel Dorsch, head of the "Agile Organization" team at Qualityminds GmbH, suggests that fostering a culture of psychological safety and empowering teams to experiment will be crucial for navigating this new landscape. The Ki-Navigator conference, offering over 100 sessions on AI applications, provides a valuable platform for organizations to learn and adapt. Early bird tickets are available until October 1st.</p>

<p>The convergence of AI and agile methodologies represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of teamwork. While challenges undoubtedly exist, the potential benefits – increased efficiency, enhanced innovation, and the ability to tackle increasingly complex problems – are too significant to ignore.  Staying informed, embracing experimentation, and fostering a culture of continuous learning will be key to thriving in this rapidly changing world.</p>

<p><b>Stay tuned to archyde.com for ongoing coverage of this developing story and in-depth analysis of the impact of AI on the future of work.</b></p>
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.