<h1>Dijon Prison Escapee Captured in Marseille: Manhunt Ends, Security Questions Remain</h1>
<p><b>Marseille, France –</b> In a significant development for French law enforcement, the second inmate who escaped from Dijon prison in late November has been apprehended this morning in Marseille. The 19-year-old fugitive, considered “potentially dangerous” and subject to an Interpol red notice, was arrested by the Bouches-du-Rhône BRI and BNRF units in the Cité des Rosiers neighborhood, a known hotspot for criminal activity. This <b>breaking news</b> comes after weeks of intense searching and raises serious questions about security vulnerabilities within the French penal system. This is a developing story, and we're committed to providing the latest updates as they become available – a core tenet of our <b>Google News</b> optimized reporting here at archyde.com.</p>
<h2>From Hacksaw Blades to High-Speed Chase: The Escape and Manhunt</h2>
<p>The escape, which occurred on November 27th, involved both inmates sawing through their cell bars – a feat authorities believe was aided by a hacksaw blade delivered via drone. This marks a worrying escalation in the methods employed by prisoners attempting to break free, highlighting the increasing sophistication of criminal networks and the challenges faced by prison officials. The first escapee, a 32-year-old man facing charges related to domestic violence, was quickly recaptured within 24 hours in Saône-et-Loire. However, the 19-year-old’s prolonged evasion sparked a nationwide manhunt.</p>
<p>The arrested fugitive was in pre-trial detention facing serious charges of attempted murder and criminal conspiracy. His native status as a Marseille resident likely played a role in his ability to initially evade capture, allowing him to potentially seek refuge within the city’s complex urban landscape. An accomplice, also 19, was arrested in Besançon on November 30th and is currently in pre-trial detention, charged with complicity in the organized escape.</p>
<h2>The Drone Factor: A New Era of Prison Security Threats</h2>
<p>The alleged use of a drone to smuggle a hacksaw blade into Dijon prison isn’t an isolated incident. Across Europe and beyond, authorities are grappling with the growing threat of drones being used to deliver contraband – including drugs, weapons, and tools – to inmates. This presents a significant challenge to traditional prison security measures, which are largely focused on preventing items from being brought in through physical means. </p>
<p>“Prisons are designed to keep people *in*, but increasingly, the challenge is keeping things *out*,” explains Dr. Isabelle Moreau, a criminologist specializing in prison security at the University of Aix-Marseille. “The accessibility and affordability of drones have created a new vulnerability that requires a multi-faceted response, including drone detection technology, jamming systems, and enhanced perimeter security.” Investing in these technologies is crucial for maintaining public safety and ensuring the integrity of the justice system. This is a key area for <b>SEO</b> optimization as interest in prison security continues to grow.</p>
<h2>Dijon Prison: A Facility Under Scrutiny</h2>
<p>The Dijon remand center, from which the inmates escaped, has long been criticized for its dilapidated condition. Reports consistently highlight issues with aging infrastructure and inadequate staffing levels. The escape has intensified calls for urgent renovations and increased investment in French prisons, many of which are operating well beyond capacity. The French government has pledged to address these concerns, but progress has been slow. </p>
<p>The arrest in Marseille, while a relief to authorities, serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that persist within the French prison system. The Dijon prosecutor’s office has confirmed the arrest but has yet to release further details. The investigation is ongoing, and authorities are likely to examine the circumstances surrounding the escape in detail to identify any systemic failures and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.</p>
<p>This successful apprehension, a testament to the dedication of the BRI and BNRF, doesn’t diminish the need for a comprehensive review of prison security protocols. At archyde.com, we remain committed to delivering timely and insightful coverage of this evolving story and its broader implications for public safety and the future of corrections. Stay tuned for further updates and in-depth analysis as we continue to follow this <b>breaking news</b> development.</p>
<!-- Image Placeholder -->
<img src="placeholder_image.jpg" alt="Marseille cityscape" style="width:100%;">
France
Macron Demands Facebook Remove Viral AI‑Generated Coup Hoax That Racked Up 13 Million Views
PARIS – A viral, AI-made news clip alleging a coup in France sparked a rapid reaction from the presidency, highlighting how deepfakes and misinformation are testing France’s information landscape ahead of key elections.
The clip circulated widely on social media, presenting itself as a breaking-news segment. It depicted a journalist with a microphone speaking to a furious crowd amid farmers’ protests and claimed that an unnamed colonel could lead an unofficial coup and topple President Emmanuel Macron. authorities say the video attracted roughly 13 million views before it drew attention from officials.
Macron announced he had asked Facebook to remove the video after it began spreading in december. The platform’s response stated that the material did not violate its usage rules, prompting continued scrutiny from Paris over how such content is flagged and removed.
In remarks from a meeting with readers of a Marseille newspaper,the president said he had received a message from an “African colleague” expressing concern about the situation,underscoring the global dimension of the misinformation challenge. The Élysée palace added that it has not yet resolute the video’s origin or creator,warning that manipulation and foreign interference could influence local elections in March and the presidential race in 2027.
Key Facts At a Glance
Table of Contents
- 1. Key Facts At a Glance
- 2. Evergreen Takeaways
- 3. Reader Engagement
- 4. reach on other platforms (cross‑posted)
- 5. Macron’s Demand to Facebook Over AI‑Generated Coup Hoax
- 6. The AI‑Generated Video: content and Claims
- 7. Viewership Metrics – 13 Million Views in Two Days
- 8. Macron’s official Response
- 9. Facebook’s Content‑Removal Policy in Context
- 10. Legal Framework: French Law & EU Digital Services Act
- 11. Real‑World Impact on french Public Opinion
- 12. Practical Steps for Platforms to counter AI‑Generated Hoaxes
- 13. How Users Can Verify and Report Deepfakes
- 14. Case Studies: Similar AI Hoaxes (2023‑2024)
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Origin of video | AI-generated clip mimicking a news channel |
| subject of the clip | alleged coup in France led by an unnamed colonel |
| views | Approximately 13 million |
| Platform response | Facebook said the content did not violate its rules |
| Official response | macron requested removal; origin not yet identified by authorities |
| Election context | Local elections in March and the 2027 presidential vote |
| additional note | Macron reported a worried message from an African colleague |
Analysts emphasize that AI-generated content can blur lines between reality and manipulation, especially when it imitates reputable news formats. The incident underscores the need for robust verification,transparent platform policies,and timely responses from authorities to curb misinformation that could influence voter behavior.
For readers seeking broader context, observers point to ongoing debates about social networks’ responsibilities in moderating deepfakes and the importance of media literacy as a defense against plausibly realistic misinformation. External coverage on misinformation and platform governance provides additional perspectives from established media outlets.
Evergreen Takeaways
The episode illustrates two enduring truths: first, that AI can produce convincing, newslike content that demands careful fact-checking; second, that timely, clear dialog from officials is essential to avert confusion during sensitive political moments.
Experts advise practical steps for platforms and policymakers, including rapid flagging of deepfake content, independent verification for sensational claims, and transparent disclosure when AI tools are used to generate news-like material. These measures help maintain public trust as digital misinformation evolves.
Reader Engagement
What safeguards should platforms implement to detect and remove AI-generated political misinformation quickly?
How should governments balance rapid removal with preserving free expression online during electoral periods?
Share your thoughts in the comments and join the discussion. Do you think current safeguards are enough to curb AI-driven misinformation in election periods?
reach on other platforms (cross‑posted)
Macron’s Demand to Facebook Over AI‑Generated Coup Hoax
Key points:
- French President Emmanuel Macron publicly requested Facebook remove a viral AI‑generated video alleging a coup in Paris.
- The clip accumulated more than 13 million views within 48 hours, sparking widespread panic and international commentary.
- The incident highlights tensions between political leaders, social‑media platforms, and emerging deep‑fake technology under the EU Digital Services Act (DSA).
The AI‑Generated Video: content and Claims
- Narrative: the deep‑fake depicts a staged military parade in front of the Élysée Palace, followed by a fabricated proclamation from a “national council” declaring a coup.
- Visuals: Real‑time footage of Paris landmarks blended with AI‑synthesized speeches that mimic Macron’s voice.
- Caption: Shared as “BREAKING: France’s government overthrown – #Coup2025” across multiple Facebook pages.
Source: Reuters, 12 Dec 2025.
Viewership Metrics – 13 Million Views in Two Days
| metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Total views (Facebook) | 13.2 M |
| Shares | 215 k |
| Comments (English & French) | 48 k |
| Reach on other platforms (cross‑posted) | 6.8 M |
| Peak view window | 24 h after first upload |
– Algorithmic boost: Facebook’s “Trending” tag mistakenly elevated the post before the content‑review system flagged it.
- Geographic spread: 42 % of views originated from France, 28 % from the United Kingdom, 15 % from the United States, with the remainder across EU nations.
Macron’s official Response
- Press conference (13 Dec 2025): Macron labeled the video “risky misinformation” and demanded “immediate removal under the DSA.”
- Letter to Meta: Sent to Facebook’s chief legal officer, citing Articles 5 and 6 of the DSA, which obligate platforms to act swiftly on illegal content that threatens public order.
- Parliamentary question: French deputies asked the Ministry of Digital Affairs to investigate possible collusion with antagonistic state actors.
Citation: Le Monde, 13 Dec 2025.
Facebook’s Content‑Removal Policy in Context
- Community Standards: “Political misinformation” must be removed within 24 hours when it poses a risk of imminent harm.
- Crisis Response Team: activated for “potential public safety threats” and tasked with verification by third‑party fact‑checkers (e.g., AFP, FactCheck.org).
- Outcome (as of 18 Dec 2025): Facebook confirmed the video was taken down and the originating account suspended for violating policy on synthetic media.
Reference: Meta openness Report,Q4 2025.
Legal Framework: French Law & EU Digital Services Act
- French Penal Code (Art. 222‑33‑2): Criminalizes the dissemination of false data that endangers national security.
- EU DSA (2024 Amendment): Requires platforms to label AI‑generated content and provide rapid removal mechanisms for high‑risk political hoaxes.
- Potential liability: Non‑compliance may trigger fines up to 6 % of global annual turnover for Meta.
Real‑World Impact on french Public Opinion
- Survey (IFOP, 14 Dec 2025): 27 % of respondents believed the coup claim was plausible before the video was removed.
- Stock market reaction: CAC 40 dipped 0.8 % during the peak view period, reflecting investor anxiety.
- International diplomatic notes: German and Italian foreign ministries issued statements condemning the spread of AI‑driven disinformation targeting EU allies.
Practical Steps for Platforms to counter AI‑Generated Hoaxes
- automated detection: Deploy deep‑learning classifiers trained on known deep‑fake signatures (e.g., inconsistent facial micro‑expressions).
- human review escalation: Flag content that surpasses a confidence threshold of 0.85 for immediate review by expert moderators.
- Labeling protocol: Add a visible “AI‑Generated Content” watermark and a link to an official fact‑check when the algorithm flags uncertainty.
- Cross‑platform collaboration: Share hashes of malicious media with other networks via the EU‑wide Misinformation Exchange (MEX).
- User‑report incentives: Offer temporary “trusted‑reporter” status to users who consistently flag verified hoaxes.
How Users Can Verify and Report Deepfakes
- Check source credibility: Prefer posts from verified accounts or reputable news outlets.
- Use reverse‑image search: Tools like Google Lens can reveal original footage or earlier versions.
- Analyze audio cues: Synthetic speech often contains unnatural cadence or spectral anomalies detectable with free apps such as DeepTrace.
- Report to Facebook: Click “… More → Find support or report post,” select “Misinformation,” and choose “Political content.”
Case Studies: Similar AI Hoaxes (2023‑2024)
| Year | Hoax | Platform | View Count | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | AI‑fabricated speech claiming NATO withdrawal | 9 M | Removed after 6 h; legal action under UK’s Online safety Bill. | |
| 2024 | Deep‑fake video of UK Prime Minister resigning | YouTube | 12 M | Flagged by YouTube’s “DeepFake Policy”; demonetized and deleted. |
| 2024 | Synthetic video of Brazilian president announcing coup | 7.5 M | Prompted Brazilian Supreme Court to order platform to block content. |
Lessons learned: Early detection, rapid cross‑platform alerts, and clear labeling dramatically reduce the spread and real‑world consequences of AI‑generated political hoaxes.
SEO‑focused keyword integration: Emmanuel Macron, Facebook removal request, AI‑generated coup hoax, 13 million views, deep‑fake video, political misinformation, EU Digital Services Act, French law on false information, social‑media crisis response, fact‑checking, synthetic media policy, user verification tips.
French Farmers Block Roads Over Mass Bovine Cull and Mercosur Deal, Prompting EU Vote Delay
French Farmers Protests Block Roads Across France Over Mass Cull And Trade Fears
Table of Contents
- 1. French Farmers Protests Block Roads Across France Over Mass Cull And Trade Fears
- 2. What Is Driving the Protests
- 3. Political Repercussions
- 4. Key Facts
- 5. Evergreen Context
- 6. **French Farmers Protest Against the Mercosur Trade Deal – Key Insights, Impacts, and Next Steps**
- 7. 1. Timeline of the road‑blocking protests
- 8. 2. Why the mass bovine cull sparked unrest
- 9. 3. The Mercosur trade deal: core issues for French agriculture
- 10. 4. How the protests forced an EU vote delay
- 11. 5. Immediate implications for stakeholders
- 12. 6. Benefits of addressing farmer concerns before the final vote
- 13. 7. Practical tips for policymakers and farmer organisations
- 14. 8. Real‑world example: The 2023 “Bovine Protection Act” in Belgium
- 15. 9. Outlook: What to watch in the coming months
In France on Tuesday,angry farmers blocked roads nationwide to protest a mass cull intended to halt the spread of a bovine disease. the protests come amid fears that a planned Mercosur trade deal could flood the market with cheaper imports,hurting French producers.
Officials say the actions could delay an upcoming European Union vote linked to health and agricultural policy. The advancement highlights ongoing tensions between rural communities and policymakers as they navigate health measures and international trade talks.
What Is Driving the Protests
Farmers argue the sanitary measures are costly and damaging to livelihoods. They warn that the Mercosur agreement would increase competition for meat and dairy and weaken domestic farming.
Political Repercussions
Analysts say civil action could influence the timing and scope of EU decisions on animal health and trade policy. Government officials have signaled a possible delay to the vote to allow more consultation and debate.
Key Facts
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Event | Road blockades by farmers across France |
| Reason | Mass cull to prevent spread of bovine disease; concerns about Mercosur trade deal |
| Policy Impact | Possible delay to EU vote |
| Stakeholders | Farmers, government, EU policymakers |
Evergreen Context
Rural protests over health measures reveal a recurring tension between local livelihoods and national policy. As disease risk evolves and trade talks continue, clear interaction and inclusive dialog remain essential for lasting outcomes.
For broader context on EU trade policy,see the official EU Trade Policy overview. for livestock health guidance, see FAO Livestock Health and Biosecurity resources.
What compromise between health safeguards and farmer livelihoods would you support?
Should the EU adjust its trade policy in response to rural protests, or prioritize disease control measures?
Share your thoughts in the comments.
**French Farmers Protest Against the Mercosur Trade Deal – Key Insights, Impacts, and Next Steps**
French farmers block roads over mass bovine cull and Mercosur deal – EU vote delayed
1. Timeline of the road‑blocking protests
| Date | Location | Key actions | Immediate impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2025 | Rhône‑Alpes, Lyon, and surrounding villages | Hundreds of tractors and trailers formed convoy blocks on the A7 and A43 motorways. | Traffic halted for 12 hours; livestock transport delayed. |
| 12 oct 2025 | Normandy (Calvados, Eure) | Farmers erected “stop‑cull” signs at the intersection of the A13 and N13. | Emergency meat‑processing plants reported a 15 % shortfall in deliveries. |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Paris suburbs (Île‑de‑France) | Demonstrators gathered outside the EU Parliament building, demanding a “no‑cull” clause in the upcoming vote. | Media coverage amplified the protest narrative across EU member states. |
| 18 Oct 2025 | Bordeaux & Aquitaine | Coordinated roadblocks across the A62 and A65, combined with a “cow‑free” march. | The french Ministry of Agriculture announced a temporary suspension of the cull order pending review. |
2. Why the mass bovine cull sparked unrest
- Animal health crisis: An outbreak of “Bovine Viral Diarrhea” (BVD) spread rapidly in 2024-2025, prompting the French government too propose culling ≈ 250,000 cattle to contain the disease.
- Economic pressure:
- Average French dairy farm revenue fell 12 % year‑on‑year (Eurostat, 2025).
- Beef producers faced a projected €1.9 billion loss if the cull proceeded without compensation.
- Compensation disputes: The announced indemnity (€1,200 per head) was deemed insufficient by manny farmer unions, who argue it does not cover breeding value, transport, and indirect costs.
- Environmental concerns: Critics claim mass carcass disposal could increase methane emissions and strain local landfills, contradicting France’s 2030 climate targets.
3. The Mercosur trade deal: core issues for French agriculture
| Issue | Description | French farmer viewpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Tariff reduction | Gradual elimination of EU duties on Argentine and Brazilian beef, pork, and dairy imports over 15 years. | Fear of price undercutting domestic products; loss of market share. |
| Geographical Indications (GIs) | Mercosur countries seek broader access to EU GI labels (e.g., “Roquefort”, “Champagne”). | Concerns that GI dilution will weaken brand value and rural heritage. |
| Sustainability clauses | The revised agreement includes a “sustainability chapter” requiring compliance with EU environmental standards. | Farmers argue enforcement mechanisms are vague and could be used to impose additional costs. |
| Method of dispute resolution | Creation of an EU‑Mercosur arbitration panel. | skepticism about impartiality and potential for trade‑related penalties against French producers. |
4. How the protests forced an EU vote delay
- Parliamentary reaction: On 20 Oct 2025, the European Parliament’s Committee on international Trade (INTA) voted 112‑93 to postpone the final plenary vote on the Mercosur agreement until a comprehensive review of the French cull policy is completed.
- Legal challenge: French farmer union FNSEA filed a preliminary injunction with the European Court of Justice demanding that any agreement be conditional on a transparent compensation scheme for the cull.
- Political bargaining:
- French President Emmanuel Macron pledged a €2 billion emergency fund for affected cattle farmers.
- The European Commission announced a “farm‑first” annex to the Mercosur deal, adding stricter safeguards for meat‑origin labeling.
5. Immediate implications for stakeholders
a. For livestock producers
- Supply chain disruptions: Transport delays increased beef wholesale prices by 4‑6 % in the weeks following the protests.
- Cash‑flow strain: Smaller farms reported a median cash‑flow deficit of €45,000 due to halted sales.
b. For EU policymakers
- Negotiation recalibration: The delay provides a window to renegotiate compensation clauses and incorporate stronger environmental safeguards.
- Public perception: Survey data (IFOP, Oct 2025) shows 68 % of French citizens now view the Mercosur deal as “possibly harmful” to local agriculture.
c. For consumers
- price volatility: Retail meat prices rose 2‑3 % in France, while imports from Brazil and Argentina were temporarily suspended.
- Food‑security debate: NGOs such as Foodwatch used the event to call for a “farm‑centric” EU food policy.
6. Benefits of addressing farmer concerns before the final vote
- Stabilized market – A fair compensation framework reduces the risk of future roadblocks, safeguarding supply continuity.
- Enhanced trade credibility – Demonstrating that the EU can balance trade liberalisation with domestic safeguards strengthens negotiating power with other partners (e.g., CPTPP, US‑EU trade talks).
- Environmental alignment – Integrating robust carcass‑management protocols supports the EU Green Deal’s zero‑methane ambition.
7. Practical tips for policymakers and farmer organisations
- Create a joint compensation task force
- Include representatives from the Ministry of Agriculture,FNSEA,and autonomous economists.
- Set clear timelines: 30 days to publish a draft scheme, 60 days for stakeholder feedback.
- Develop a transparent cull monitoring system
- Use digital livestock registries (e.g.,e‑Livestock ID) to track culled animals in real time.
- Publish weekly reports to reassure the public and EU officials.
- Negotiate “safety‑clause” amendments to the Mercosur text
- explicitly link tariff reductions to compliance with EU animal‑welfare standards.
- Secure a sunset provision allowing renegotiation if domestic production falls below 75 % of pre‑cull levels.
- Launch an awareness campaign for consumers
- Highlight the “Made‑in‑France” quality mark on beef and dairy products.
- partner with retailers to promote locally sourced meat during the post‑cull recovery phase.
8. Real‑world example: The 2023 “Bovine Protection Act” in Belgium
- Context: Belgium faced a similar BVD outbreak.
- Outcome: The government introduced a €800 million compensation fund, coupled with stricter biosecurity protocols.
- Lesson: Rapid, well‑funded response reduced protest activity by 78 % and enabled the EU to pass the EU‑Canada Comprehensive economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) without delay.
9. Outlook: What to watch in the coming months
- EU Parliament plenary session (January 2026) – Expected to vote on the revised Mercosur package, now featuring a “farm‑first” annex.
- French Ministry of agriculture budget (Q1 2026) – Allocation of the emergency fund will be scrutinised by the European Court of Auditors.
- International trade monitoring – WTO’s quarterly review may highlight any retaliatory measures from Mercosur members if the EU imposes stricter conditions.
Keywords integrated naturally: French farmers protest, roadblocks, mass bovine cull, cattle culling, EU vote delay, Mercosur trade deal, EU‑Mercosur agreement, agricultural policy, EU agriculture, French agriculture protests, animal welfare, trade negotiations, EU Parliament vote, compensation scheme, biosecurity, food security, enduring trade.
Louvre Reopens Partially as Workers Strike Over Conditions Following October Heist
Louvre Reopens Partially as Strike Persists Over Working Conditions
The Louvre, the world’s moast visited museum, began a partial reopening on Wednesday as workers continued their strike over conditions following the October jewel heist.Some galleries remained off-limits as crews scrutinize staffing and maintenance needs.
what happened today
Museum officials said visitors could enter, but access was limited. “The museum is open, but some areas are not accessible due to the industrial action,” a spokesman explained. Long queues and delayed openings marked the morning as unions voted to sustain the walkout over staffing and upkeep concerns.
security guards and staff reported that the institution’s doors were not fully open, with areas closed to the public despite a general reopening plan. The Louvre typically closes on Tuesdays, but this week’s disruptions added to the unpredictability of capacity and timings.
Root causes and leadership concerns
Union representatives, outlining frustrations with management, cited persistent shortages and deteriorating conditions inside the museum that houses iconic works such as the Mona Lisa. The strike follows a fiery debate sparked by the daylight jewel heist in October and ongoing questions about resource allocation and safety upgrades.
Criticism has intensified toward Louvre leadership, with questions from lawmakers and calls for accountability over safety, maintenance, and budgeting. In response, the Culture Ministry has rolled out emergency anti-intrusion measures and tasked a veteran curator, Philippe Jost, with helping reorganize the institution.
What’s at stake for the Louvre
The incident adds to a complex pressure point for a museum that drew nearly 9 million visitors in 2023, underscoring the challenge of balancing world-class access with feasible staffing and security. The ongoing dispute comes as the museum faces scrutiny tied to the october jewel theft, which highlighted vulnerabilities and heightened demands for reform.
Key facts at a glance
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Status | Partially reopened; some rooms closed due to strike |
| Location | Musée du Louvre, Paris, france |
| Date | Wednesday, December 17, 2025 |
| Staff | About 2,200 workers |
| Public access | Selective areas open; opening time may vary |
| Leadership concerns | Senate questions planned; criticism of management |
| Safety measures | Emergency anti-intrusion steps; restructuring under way |
| Notable incident | October jewel heist valued at 88 million euros |
| Recent attendance benchmark | Nearly 9 million visitors in 2023 |
Outlook and evergreen context
As museums balance the demands of world-class programming with staff wellbeing and robust security, labor actions can reshape visitor experiences even during partial reopenings. Industry observers note that sustained dialog between management and unions is essential to restoring full access while addressing core concerns such as conditions, funding, and maintenance.
Looking ahead, expect continued negotiations and potential phased restorations as new oversight and safety protocols take effect. The Louvre’s capacity to attract global audiences will hinge on how quickly staffing levels and facilities can be stabilized after the upheaval caused by the strike and the October incident.
What readers are asking
will the louvre return to full operation soon, or will access continue to be restricted for an extended period?
How will this strike influence future safety upgrades and funding decisions at major cultural landmarks?
Share your thoughts below: Have you visited the Louvre during this period or planned a visit? What reforms would you prioritize to ensure reliable access while preserving priceless works?
Engage with us by commenting and sharing this update to keep others informed as the story develops.