Passengers and crew of a British Airways plane hijacked in Kuwait in 1990 have sued both the government and the airline. Passengers and crew members of BA 149 maintain that both the British government and the airline were aware of the seriousness of the situation but still did not avoid putting their lives in danger. Law firm McCaw Jury & Partners indicated in September that damages of up to $213,000 per person might be sought.
Remember that during the Gulf War, hundreds of passengers and crew members of the British Airways flight were taken hostage. 94 of them have filed a case in the London High Court.
BA 149 was on its way to Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia. On April 2, its 367 passengers and crew members were taken hostage upon landing in Kuwait. This incident was a few hours following Iraq invaded Kuwait. Some of the passengers and crew members of the plane were held hostage in Kuwait for more than four months.
The 94 people who filed the lawsuit had suffered physical and mental torture as hostages, London law firm McCaw Jury & Partners said in a statement. Its effects on his life are still visible. According to the law firm, the passengers say the British government was aware of Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait but still allowed the British Airways flight to land there.
Singapore Airways has provided compensation of US$10,000 to passengers injured on a London to Singapore flight that skilled extreme turbulence.
In an announcement on Fb, the extra severely injured SQ321 passengers stated the airline offered “an preliminary fee of US$25,000 to deal with their wants straight” and additional discussions to satisfy their “particular circumstances.”
A 73-year-old British passenger died and dozens of others had been injured when flight SQ 321 hit turbulence over Myanmar and diverted to Thailand in Might.
Singapore Airways has not responded to BBC Information’ request for extra details regarding how many individuals are eligible for the funds.
Greater than 100 folks in SQ 321 had been handled in Bangkok hospitals following the incident.
Preliminary investigations confirmed that the aircraft accelerated quickly up and down, and descended regarding 178 toes (54 meters) in 4.6 seconds.
Additionally learn: Singapore Airways Passengers and Crew Arrive at Changi Airport
Passengers described how the crew and people not carrying seat belts had been thrown and hit the cabin ceiling.
A hospital in Bangkok the place the passenger was handled stated there have been spinal, head and muscle accidents.
There have been 211 passengers – together with many Britons, Australians and Singaporeans – and 18 crew on board the Boeing 777-300ER on the time of the incident.
Additionally learn: British man who died on Singapore Airways flight recognized
The corporate stated it might provide full refunds to all passengers on the flight, together with those that didn’t undergo any accidents.
Moreover, Singapore Airways stated passengers would obtain delay compensation in accordance with European Union or United Kingdom laws.
The airline additionally provided S$1,000 (US$739; £580) to all passengers to cowl speedy prices and organize for family members to fly to the Thai capital if requested.
Based on worldwide laws, airways should provide compensation when passengers are injured or die whereas on board.
The incident drew consideration to seat belt utilization practices, as airways sometimes permit passengers to unbuckle their belts throughout regular flight circumstances. (BBC/Z-3)
#Singapore #Airways #Affords #US10 #Thousand #Compensation #Passengers #Injured #Due #Turbulence
More rights for passengers? “600 euros for a lost suitcase would be appropriate” 2024-04-02 06:10:34
Dhe number 261 is one that is not particularly liked by airlines in Europe. Because behind what are known in industry jargon as 261 cases, it is not uncommon for airlines to have to pay passengers fixed compensation rates of 250 to 600 euros for long delays or short-term flight cancellations. The cases are named following EU Regulation 261 from 2004, which was intended to create a “uniform minimum level of protection” for travelers along with EU passenger rights.
After two decades of EU rules that have not led to an end to all passenger anger, Tomasz Pawliszyn, head of the legal service provider Airhelp, believes the time is ripe for an overhaul. And in his opinion this should lead to airlines having to pay more. “After 20 years, a reform of air passenger rights is necessary. The compensation rates have never been adjusted,” says Pawliszyn in an interview with the FAZ. “Just to react to the price development, a surcharge of 57 percent would now be necessary.”
#rights #passengers #euros #lost #suitcase
2023-12-02 00:09:00
Original title: Zhang Jizhong was sentenced to apologize to his ex-wife and compensate for infringement following announcing the divorce agreement.
Yangtze Evening News (Reporter Zhang Nan) On November 30, the Beijing Internet Court made a first-instance judgment in the case of former famous CCTV director Fan Xinman suing famous director Zhang Jizhong for privacy infringement: it ruled that Zhang Jizhong should publicly apologize to Fan Xinman and compensate Fan Xinman for her mental damage. Solatium of 20,000 yuan.
Previously, Zhang Jizhong publicly released the “Divorce Agreement” with Fan Xinman on the Internet, illegally making Fan Xinman’s name, year, month, and day of birth, child support status, property and division status, and the private information of her divorce agreement illegally public to the public. Fan Xinman believed that the divorce agreement was the privacy of both parties and was published to the public without consent, which seriously damaged personal privacy and the mental health of the children, so she took Zhang Jizhong to court.
Zhang Jizhong has served as the producer of “The Swordsman”, “Dragon”, “The Legend of the Condor Heroes” and “The Legend of the Condor Heroes”. Fan Xinman is a former famous director of CCTV and has participated in the production of “Oriental Time and Space: People’s Stories” and “Moving China”. Fan Xinman is 15 years younger than Zhang Jizhong. The two met in 1988, officially registered their marriage in May 2002, and divorced on December 23, 2016.
1701494708
#announcement #divorce #agreement #triggered #tort #lawsuit #Zhang #Jizhong #sentenced #apologize #exwife #compensate #Peoples #Livelihood #China #Industry #Network