Tech Stocks Face ‘Sell-The-News’ Trend Amid Shifting Investor Sentiment

A puzzling phenomenon is gripping the Stock Market: Even positive Earnings Reports are failing too lift share prices for some of the biggest Tech companies. This “sell-the-news” trend, where stocks decline despite positive announcements, signals a shifting dynamic in Investor Sentiment and raises questions about future market performance.

Earnings Reactions Fall Short of Historical Averages

Companies within the S&P 500 that surpassed Earnings expectations in the fourth quarter of last year experienced a modest average price increase of just 0.6% in the two days following the proclamation. This is notably lower than the five-year average of 0.9% for similar surprises,suggesting Investors are less willing to reward positive news than they have been previously.

Global market Dynamics and Capital Shifts

The strength of the U.S. Stock Market over the past several years has begun to spread to other markets, potentially limiting further gains domestically. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has risen 8% this year, while the S&P 500 has only managed a 1% increase. this divergence coincides with a decrease in confidence in Dollar-denominated assets, prompting Investors to seek choice investments like precious metals such as Gold and Silver.

Software Sector Under Pressure From AI Concerns

The software industry is facing particular scrutiny. Despite reporting generally positive results, shares of Microsoft and ServiceNow plummeted, dragging down sentiment across the sector. Investors are increasingly concerned that traditional subscription-based software models could be disrupted by the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence. companies like Salesforce and Adobe have also seen their stock prices decline in the wake of Microsoft and ServiceNow’s performance.

Big tech Divergence

The Earnings season has revealed a mixed bag among big Tech companies. Meta Platforms Inc. stood out with a strong positive reaction to its Earnings announcement, while others experienced muted responses despite delivering good news. tesla saw a slight decline after announcing a shift to robot production, and Apple’s stock price rose less than 1% despite better-than-expected iPhone sales, dampened by concerns over rising memory costs.

AI Beneficiaries Buck The trend

Not all companies are struggling. Those positioned to benefit from the growing demand for AI-related components, such as SanDisk and Seagate, have continued to see their stock prices climb following positive Earnings reports. This highlights a polarization within the market, with Investors favoring companies directly involved in the AI boom.

Upcoming Earnings Releases to Watch

The Earnings season is far from over. Amazon is scheduled to report on February 4th, followed by Alphabet (Google) on February 5th. A key focus for Investors will be the level of capital expenditure these companies are allocating to AI growth. The season will culminate on February 25th with NVIDIA’s announcement,widely considered to be a bellwether for the technology sector.

What factors contributed to teh recent decline in microsoft, Intel, and UnitedHealth shares?

Tech giants Plunge: Microsoft, Intel, UnitedHealth Slide Amid weak Forecasts and AI Concerns

The market witnessed a notable downturn today, February 1st, 2026, wiht major tech players – Microsoft, intel, and even healthcare giant UnitedHealth Group – experiencing significant stock slides. The catalyst? A combination of weaker-than-expected financial forecasts and growing anxieties surrounding the practical implementation and costs associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Let’s break down what’s happening with each company and the broader implications for the tech sector and investment strategies.

Microsoft’s Azure Slowdown & AI Investment Doubts

Microsoft (MSFT) shares dipped over 6% in after-hours trading following its Q3 2026 earnings report.While overall revenue remains strong, the growth rate of Azure, its cloud computing platform, has demonstrably slowed.This deceleration is raising concerns about increased competition from Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud Platform (GCP).

* Key Concerns: Analysts point to a saturation point in enterprise cloud adoption and a shift towards more cost-optimized solutions.

* AI Spending Scrutiny: Microsoft’s massive investments in OpenAI and the integration of AI across its product suite (Copilot, Office 365) are now under increased scrutiny. Investors are questioning the timeline for realizing a return on these substantial investments. The initial hype surrounding generative AI is giving way to a more pragmatic assessment of its profitability.

* Impact on Stock Valuation: The slowdown in Azure growth, coupled with AI investment uncertainty, has led to a downward revision of Microsoft’s future earnings projections by several investment firms.

Intel’s Ongoing Struggles & the AI Chip Race

intel (INTC) continued its downward trajectory, falling nearly 8% today.The company is grappling with ongoing challenges in the competitive semiconductor market, especially in the face of AMD’s (AMD) advancements and NVIDIA’s (NVDA) dominance in the AI chip space.

* Foundry Delays: Intel’s ambitious plans to become a major player in the semiconductor foundry business are facing delays, impacting its ability to capitalize on the global chip shortage and meet customer demand.

* AI Chip Competition: While Intel is developing its own AI accelerators (Gaudi), they are currently lagging behind NVIDIA’s H100 and upcoming Blackwell architectures in terms of performance and market share. This is a critical disadvantage as demand for AI-specific hardware surges.

* PC Market Weakness: The persistent weakness in the personal computer (PC) market, exacerbated by economic uncertainty, is further weighing on Intel’s revenue.

* Real-World Example: The recent proclamation by several major data center operators prioritizing NVIDIA GPUs for AI workloads highlights Intel’s struggle to gain traction in this crucial segment.

UnitedHealth Group: Cybersecurity & AI Integration Costs

The decline of UnitedHealth Group (UNH) – down approximately 4% – is a slightly different story, but still tied to broader tech and AI-related anxieties. The company’s recent large-scale cybersecurity breach, impacting millions of patients, has shaken investor confidence.

* Cybersecurity Costs: The cost of remediation, legal settlements, and enhanced security measures following the breach is expected to be substantial, impacting UnitedHealth’s profitability.

* AI in Healthcare – Implementation Challenges: unitedhealth is heavily investing in AI to improve claims processing,fraud detection,and patient care.Tho, the integration of AI into complex healthcare systems is proving to be more challenging and expensive than initially anticipated. Concerns about data privacy and algorithmic bias are also adding to the complexity.

* Regulatory Scrutiny: Increased regulatory scrutiny of AI applications in healthcare is creating uncertainty and possibly slowing down adoption.

Broader Market Implications & Investor Sentiment

The combined decline of these three tech giants reflects a broader shift in investor sentiment. The initial exuberance surrounding AI is being tempered by a more realistic assessment of its costs, implementation challenges, and competitive landscape.

* Tech Sector Rotation: investors are beginning to rotate out of high-growth tech stocks and into more value-oriented investments.

* Interest Rate Sensitivity: The ongoing uncertainty surrounding interest rate policy is also contributing to market volatility. Higher interest rates make growth stocks less attractive.

* Economic Slowdown Fears: Lingering concerns about a potential economic slowdown are further exacerbating the negative sentiment.

Benefits of a Cautious Approach to AI Investment

While the current downturn may seem alarming, it presents opportunities for long-term investors. A more cautious approach to AI investment can yield significant benefits:

* Reduced Risk: Avoiding overvalued AI stocks can protect your portfolio from substantial losses.

* Focus on Fundamentals: Prioritizing companies with strong fundamentals, sustainable business models, and proven track records.

* Long-Term growth: Identifying companies that are strategically positioned to benefit from the long-term growth of AI, but are currently undervalued.

Practical Tips for Navigating the Tech Downturn

here are some practical tips for investors navigating this challenging market habitat:

1. Diversify Your Portfolio: Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Diversify your investments across different sectors and asset classes.
2. Conduct Thorough Research: Before investing in any company, conduct thorough research and understand its business model, competitive landscape, and financial performance.
3. Focus on Long-Term Value: Don’t get caught up in short-term market fluctuations. Focus on identifying companies with long-term growth potential.
4. Consider Dollar-Cost Averaging: Invest a fixed amount of money at regular intervals,regardless of market conditions. This can help you reduce your average cost per share.
5. Stay Informed: Keep up-to-date on the latest market news and trends.

###

Health

Colorectal cancer: deaths in the under 50s are increasing in the USA. The situation in Italy

by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health January 27, 2026

written by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health

Of
True Martinella

In the United States it is the only cancer for which mortality in young people is increasing rather than decreasing. In our country it is the second most frequent but there is not the same increase in deaths. The causes and possible solutions explained by the experts

The alarm sounded in the United States a few years ago: is from 2022in fact, that experts have highlighted an increase in cancer cases among young people, before the age of 50. Since then, numerous studies have been published confirming the growing trend especially for the breast cancer and for that to colorectal. Llatest report from the American Cancer Societyhowever, adds a new, worrying piece: for colorectal cancer, it is not only new diagnoses that are increasing, but also deaths. Indeed, to be precise, this is thethe only neoplasm among young people for which deaths among those under 50 are increasingas he points out study just published in the scientific journal Jama. «It is now clear that colorectal cancer can no longer be defined as “a disease of the elderly” – he says Ahmedin Jemal, senior vice president of the American Cancer Society -. We must redouble our efforts to identify the cause of this tsunami of cancers in generations born after 1950.”

The latest statistics in America and the UK

Table of Contents

• 1. The latest statistics in America and the UK
• 2. The Italian situation
• 3. The life-saving test that too many Italians don’t take
• 4. Problems and solutions: symptoms not to be overlooked
• 5. How does colorectal cancer mortality among people under 50 compare between the US and Italy?
• 6. Colorectal Cancer: Rising Deaths in the Under 50s – A US & Italy Comparison
• 7. The US Situation: A Concerning Surge
• 8. Italy’s Perspective: A Different Landscape?
• 9. Understanding the Risk Factors
• 10. Screening: When Should You start?
• 11. Recognizing the Symptoms

In the most recent survey, researchers examined cancer mortality in the US between 1990 and 2023 and focused on most lethal pathologies in the population under 50 years of age: leukemia, brain, breast, lung and colorectal tumors.
In the time period taken into consideration (33 years), 1.27 million Americans under 50 died from cancer and, in general, mortality dropped by 44%. However, by analyzing the various tumors individually it emerged that i deaths decreased for all types of cancer except one, colorectal cancer, whose mortality has grown by 1.1% every year from 2005 onwards. While it fell annually by 0.3% for the brain, 1.4% for the breast, 2.3% for leukemia and 5.7% for the lung.
Breaking down the cases by sex, in 2023 colorectal cancer was the first in the ranking (as a cause of death from cancer under the age of 50) among men and second (after breast cancer) among women.
A a similar situation was recorded in the United Kingdomwhere data collected by Cancer Research UK indicates the colorectal cancer as the second most common cause of cancer death in Britainwith approximately 17,400 deaths per year (between 2021 and 2023 it accounted for 10% of all cancer deaths).
A research published in the British Medical Journal in 2024 had also highlighted a decline in cancer deaths among people aged 35-69 in the UKassuming that the credit should be distributed among various advances: the dissemination of smoking cessation programsl’increase in early diagnoses through screening programs el’arrival of new therapies.

The Italian situation

«The one in the colorectum which, with almost 49 thousand (48.706) new cases registered every yearAnd the second most frequent type of tumor in Italy and it is also second in the little coveted ranking of the most lethal, causing approximately 20 thousand deaths per year – remember Carmine Pinto, director of Medical Oncology at the Comprehensive Cancer Center of the AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia –. And if mortality is decreasing (thanks to early diagnosis programs, improvements in surgery and advances in therapies) and At the moment we have not noticed the increase in mortality emerging in Americathe number of cases is unfortunately growing, even in young people, before the age of 50despite well 9 out of 10 cases could be avoided only thanks to a simple and painless test which millions of Italians choose not to do.”

The life-saving test that too many Italians don’t take

In fact, almost 90% of colorectal cancers develop from adenomas that take years, on average about ten, to transform into malignant forms. It is in this time window that screening with the fecal occult blood test allows for an early diagnosis ed eliminate intestinal polyps before they have acquired dangerous characteristics and evolve into a malignant tumor. But over half of Italians do not take the opportunity. The exam is offered by the National Health Service to all citizens between the ages of 50 and 70 who receive, every two years, a letter from their local health authority with the invitation to go to the nearest pharmacy to collect a small container in which collect a stool sampleand then return it and receive the letter with the report at home within a couple of weeks.
“If he test for occult blood in feces (Sof) tests positive, the patient is sent for treatment colonoscopy which allows you to highlight and remove any precancerous lesion or to perform a biopsy – continues Mario Scartozzi, full professor at the University of Cagliari and director of medical oncology at the University Hospital of the Sardinian capital -. Screening allows us to intervene when the person does not yet have symptoms. The advantage is clear and so are the numbers: participating in screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer by 20-30%, thanks to early diagnosis and the possibility of intervening immediately on lesions in the initial stage.”

Problems and solutions: symptoms not to be overlooked

What could be due to this increase in colon cancer mortality among those under 50 in America? «Various factors can have an influence – replies Pinto -: meanwhile, screening with the Sof test only involves the population from the age of 50, which makes early diagnosis more difficult. And then there is the question of lifestyles: the bad eating habitsthe sedentary lifestyle e obesity are on the rise among young Americans and this has a great impact, while in Italy we still enjoy a protective effect of the Mediterranean diet.” Protective effect increasingly threatened by overweight, by lack of physical activity and incorrect nutrition which are increasingly widespread in Italy too. “Furthermore colorectal cancer appears to have more aggressive characteristics at a young age and this makes it more difficult to treat – he concludes Scartozzi -. Making matters worse is the fact that those under 50 they often arrive late at the diagnosis Why they ignore the first signs such as for example frequent and persistent diarrhea, blood loss (bright red, together with feces or not), continuous abdominal pain and which persist for long periods.”

January 27, 2026 (changed January 27, 2026 | 10:36)

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Do you have a doubt or medical question?

Our doctors and specialists answer your questions on health topics

How does colorectal cancer mortality among people under 50 compare between the US and Italy?

Colorectal Cancer: Rising Deaths in the Under 50s – A US & Italy Comparison

Colorectal cancer, frequently enough thought of as a disease of older adults, is exhibiting a disturbing trend: increasing incidence and mortality rates in individuals under 50. While overall cancer deaths are declining in the US,colorectal cancer is bucking that trend,notably amongst younger populations. But how does this compare to other nations, specifically Italy? Let’s delve into the specifics, risk factors, screening recommendations, and what you can do to protect your health.

The US Situation: A Concerning Surge

Recent data, including findings from Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/colon-cancer-is-killing-more-young-people-in-the-u.s-than-any-other-cancer/, highlights a significant rise in colorectal cancer cases and deaths among Americans under 50.This isn’t a minor uptick; it’s a noticeable surge, making it the leading cause of cancer death in this age group.

Here’s a breakdown of key observations:

* Increased Incidence: The rate of diagnosis for early-onset colorectal cancer (diagnosed before age 50) has been steadily increasing for decades.

* Mortality Shift: While overall cancer mortality is decreasing,colorectal cancer mortality in younger adults is increasing.

* Stage at Diagnosis: Younger patients are often diagnosed at later stages of the disease, leading to poorer prognoses and more aggressive treatment requirements.

* Geographic Variations: Some regions within the US are experiencing more pronounced increases than others, suggesting potential environmental or lifestyle factors.

Italy’s Perspective: A Different Landscape?

The situation in Italy presents a contrasting, though still concerning, picture. While Italy generally has lower colorectal cancer incidence rates compared to the US, data suggests a similar, albeit less dramatic, trend of increasing cases in younger adults.

Several factors contribute to this difference:

* Dietary Habits: The conventional Mediterranean diet, prevalent in Italy, is rich in fiber, fruits, and vegetables – factors associated with lower colorectal cancer risk. However,dietary patterns are shifting with increased consumption of processed foods.

* Healthcare System: Italy’s universal healthcare system provides broader access to screening and treatment, potentially leading to earlier detection.

* Screening Programs: National colorectal cancer screening programs are being implemented, but uptake varies regionally.

* Lifestyle Factors: Smoking rates are lower in Italy compared to the US, a known risk factor for colorectal cancer.

however, studies indicate that the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer is rising in Italy, particularly in certain regions. This highlights the importance of ongoing surveillance and preventative measures.

Understanding the Risk Factors

Regardless of location, several risk factors contribute to the development of colorectal cancer, especially in younger individuals:

* Family History: A strong family history of colorectal cancer or polyps significantly increases your risk.

* Inflammatory Bowel disease (IBD): Conditions like Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis elevate risk.

* Genetic Syndromes: Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are inherited conditions that dramatically increase risk.

* Diet: A diet high in red and processed meats,and low in fiber,is linked to increased risk.

* Obesity: Being overweight or obese increases your risk.

* Physical Inactivity: A sedentary lifestyle contributes to risk.

* Smoking: Smoking is a well-established risk factor.

* Alcohol Consumption: Excessive alcohol intake is associated with increased risk.

* Gut Microbiome: Emerging research suggests the composition of your gut microbiome plays a role.

Screening: When Should You start?

traditional screening guidelines recommended starting regular colonoscopies at age 50. Though, given the rising incidence in younger adults, these guidelines are evolving.

* US Guidelines: Major organizations are now considering lowering the recommended screening age to 45. Individuals with a family history or other risk factors should discuss earlier screening with their doctor.

* Italian Guidelines: Italy’s national screening program currently targets individuals aged 50-69, but regional variations exist. Doctors are increasingly recommending earlier screening for those with risk factors.

Available Screening Methods:

1. Colonoscopy: Considered the gold standard, allowing for visualization of the entire colon and removal of polyps.
2. Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT): A non-invasive test that detects blood in the stool.
3. Stool DNA Test (Cologuard): Detects both blood and abnormal DNA in the stool.
4. flexible Sigmoidoscopy: Examines onyl the lower portion of the colon.
5. CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): Uses CT scans to create images of the colon.

Recognizing the Symptoms

Early detection is crucial. Be aware of potential symptoms, which can be subtle:

* Changes in Bowel Habits: Persistent diarrhea, constipation, or a change in stool consistency.

* Rectal Bleeding: Any blood in your stool, even small amounts.

* **Abdominal Pain or Cram

January 27, 2026 0 comments

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

world

Minneapolis Nurse’s Killing: Video Evidence Contradicts Official Account

by January 25, 2026

written by

“`html

Government Shutdown Looms as Minneapolis Events Add to Political Pressure

Table of Contents

• 1. Government Shutdown Looms as Minneapolis Events Add to Political Pressure
• 2. Minneapolis and the Escalating Political Climate
• 3. The Core of the Budgetary Impasse
• 4. ACE Campaigns and Regional Political Instability
• 5. What evidence contradicts the official account of the Minneapolis nurse’s shooting?
• 6. Minneapolis Nurse’s Killing: Video Evidence Contradicts Official Account
• 7. The initial Report & Conflicting Narratives
• 8. What the Video Shows: A Timeline of Events
• 9. The Role of Body Cameras & Transparency
• 10. Legal Ramifications & Potential Charges
• 11. Community Response & Calls for Justice
• 12. The Case of Alex Pretti: A Turning Point?

Washington D.C. – Mounting Political tensions, exacerbated by recent events in Minneapolis, are increasing the likelihood of a United States Federal Government shutdown. The situation, already complex due to ongoing budgetary disagreements, has been further intricate by escalating political rhetoric, threatening to halt essential government services.

Minneapolis and the Escalating Political Climate

Recent developments in Minneapolis have injected additional volatility into an Already fragile political landscape.While the specifics of those events remain contentious, they have become a focal point for partisan debate, intensifying existing divisions within Congress.Critics allege that certain factions are deliberately leveraging the situation to obstruct progress on critical funding legislation.

The Core of the Budgetary Impasse

The primary point of contention centers on federal spending levels. Conservative lawmakers are pushing for ample cuts to discretionary spending, arguing for fiscal restraint and reduced national debt. This stance clashes with the Biden management’s priorities, which prioritize investments in social programs and infrastructure. The proposed cuts have faced fierce opposition from Democrats, who contend they would disproportionately harm vulnerable populations and hinder economic growth.

The current temporary funding measure is set to expire, and reaching a consensus on a long-term budget resolution appears increasingly challenging. Several key deadlines are rapidly approaching,leaving little room for negotiation. As the shutdown date nears, the pressure on lawmakers to find a compromise intensifies.

ACE Campaigns and Regional Political Instability

Beyond the domestic budgetary struggles, wider geopolitical concerns

What evidence contradicts the official account of the Minneapolis nurse’s shooting?

Minneapolis Nurse’s Killing: Video Evidence Contradicts Official Account

The death of alex Pretti,a minneapolis resident shot by a Border Patrol agent on January 24th,2026,is sparking outrage and demands for openness. Initial reports from Minnesota officials painted a picture of a justified shooting, but newly surfaced video evidence appears to directly challenge that narrative. This article examines the discrepancies between the official account and the emerging visual evidence, exploring the implications for police accountability and community trust.

The initial Report & Conflicting Narratives

Promptly following the shooting, authorities stated the Border Patrol agent acted in self-defense during a confrontation. Details where scarce,and the initial press release focused on the agent’s perceived threat. Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, at the time, publicly supported the agent’s actions, citing the need to protect law enforcement.

However, this account quickly came under scrutiny. Advocates for Pretti’s family and community members questioned the speed with which the shooting was deemed justified, particularly given Pretti’s background as a registered nurse and lack of prior criminal record. The situation was further complicated by conflicting statements from the Trump management, which emphasized the agent’s authority and the dangers faced by federal law enforcement.

What the Video Shows: A Timeline of Events

Independent video footage, obtained from a nearby business’s security cameras and corroborated by witness statements, presents a significantly diffrent picture of the events leading up to the shooting.

* 1:47 PM: Pretti is seen walking down the street, appearing to be talking on his phone. He is not exhibiting any aggressive behavior.

* 1:48 PM: A Border Patrol vehicle pulls up alongside Pretti. The agent immediately exits the vehicle and approaches pretti, shouting commands.

* 1:48:15 PM: Pretti appears startled and raises his hands in a gesture of surrender. The video shows him attempting to explain himself, but the agent continues to shout.

* 1:48:30 PM: The agent draws his weapon. Witnesses report hearing the agent yell, “stop resisting!” despite Pretti’s hands being visibly raised.

* 1:48:35 PM: The agent fires a single shot, striking Pretti in the chest. Pretti collapses to the ground.

* 1:48:40 PM: The agent does not immediately render aid. Paramedics arrive on the scene approximately eight minutes later.

The video clearly contradicts the initial claim of a struggle or immediate threat to the agent’s life. Experts analyzing the footage have noted the agent’s aggressive approach and the lack of de-escalation tactics employed.

The Role of Body Cameras & Transparency

The absence of body camera footage from the Border Patrol agent has fueled further criticism. While the agency claims the agent was not equipped with a body camera at the time of the shooting – a policy that has been widely debated in recent years – advocates argue this lack of transparency hinders a full and impartial investigation.

the push for mandatory body cameras for all federal law enforcement agents is gaining momentum, with civil rights groups arguing they are crucial for accountability and building public trust. The Pretti case serves as a stark example of why this technology is essential.

Legal Ramifications & Potential Charges

The Minneapolis Police Department, in conjunction with the FBI, is currently investigating the shooting. Legal experts suggest the video evidence could support charges against the agent,ranging from manslaughter to second-degree murder.

Key legal considerations include:

1. Use of Force Continuum: Did the agent’s use of force align with the severity of the perceived threat?
2. duty to De-escalate: Did the agent attempt to de-escalate the situation before resorting to lethal force?
3. Reasonable Suspicion: Was there reasonable suspicion to believe Pretti had committed a crime justifying the initial stop?

The outcome of the investigation will likely set a precedent for future cases involving federal agents and civilian encounters.

Community Response & Calls for Justice

The shooting has ignited protests in Minneapolis and across the country. Demonstrators are demanding justice for Alex Pretti and calling for systemic reforms within federal law enforcement agencies.

Community organizations are organizing rallies, petitioning for independent investigations, and providing support to Pretti’s family. The incident has also reignited the debate surrounding qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields government officials from liability in civil lawsuits unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.

The Case of Alex Pretti: A Turning Point?

The death of Alex Pretti and the subsequent revelations about the shooting represent a potential turning point in the ongoing conversation about police accountability and racial justice. The video evidence, coupled with the conflicting narratives, underscores the importance of independent investigations, transparency, and the need for thorough police reform. As the investigation continues, the nation watches, hoping for a just outcome and a commitment to preventing similar tragedies in the future.

January 25, 2026 0 comments

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

• Economy
• Entertainment
• Health
• News
• Sport
• Technology
• world

@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]