Dubai, United Arab Emirates (CNN) – The Islamic preacher, Ahmed Al-Ghamdi, the former director general of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, responded to a tweet that touched on a book Sahih Bukhari Which transmits hadiths from the Prophet Muhammad and is considered one of the most authentic books in the transmission of hadiths among the general Sunnis.
And in response to a tweet from Prof. Jamal Sanad Al-Suwaidi, in which he wrote: “Al-Bukhari says in his Sahih that the two surahs of Al-Falaq and An-Nas are not part of the Holy Qur’an,” Al-Ghamdi replied, saying: “This is an incorrect statement. It is from the Book of God, and it is not a hadith from the Prophet, nor a saying by Al-Bukhari, and how many of my Companions made a wrong effort, so what was it, so why all this intimidation?
The owner of Fasl Al-Khatib’s account commented: “I had a question, Dr. Ahmed, with your permission… What is the wisdom or desired benefit that is expected to occur following transmitting a wrong ijtihad with a statement like this stating that the two temptations are not from the Book of God? Please, why do they still keep what is wrong in this bowl?”
Al-Ghamdi replied: “First: I did not have a valid chain of transmission with this transmission, so we do not question the wisdom of that, because the explanation is a branch of correction.. Second: Al-Bukhari’s transmission of this trace does not depart from two cases: One: he sees the validity of his chain of transmission, but Ibn Masoud wanted them to be not from a book. By God, that is, it is not fixed in the Qur’an even though it is recognised, because the two surahs are fixed in the recitation of Ibn Masoud.
Al-Ghamdi continued: “The second: he sees it as being suspended in it or seeing its weakness, but the trustworthiness of the transmission prompted him to narrate it in his book as a matter of definition and trust over the one who narrated it, content with mentioning its chain of transmission, which is farther than the first possibility.”
