MEXICO CITY.- The ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) joined the indefinite work stoppage of Judicial Branch of the Federation (PJF) in rejection of the president’s judicial reform Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
The measure was approved with eight votes in favor and two against during Tuesday’s session.
SCJN goes on strike in rejection of judicial reform
Table of Contents
- 1 SCJN goes on strike in rejection of judicial reform
- 2 Three ministers reject the strike
- 3 Respond to ministers close to AMLO
- 4 What are the main reasons behind Mexico’s Supreme Court justices going on strike against President Lopez Obrador’s judicial reform?
- 5 What are the main reasons behind the Supreme Court justices’ strike against President Lopez Obrador’s judicial reform?
Table of Contents
One day after the Court’s workers joined the work stoppage that began on November 19, the ministers decided to join the national protest.
This is an unprecedented event in the history of the country’s highest court, being the first work stoppage of the Court.
Three ministers reject the strike
At the end of today’s meeting, the ministers Lenia Batres Guadarrama, Yasmin Esquivel Mossa y Loretta Ortizwho voted against the strike, met privately to prepare a position on the matter.
“We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the suspension of work. It is our constitutional responsibility to exercise the office of ministers and provide the public service of administering justice,” they declared.
The three ministers, singled out by critics as “close” to AMLO, They stated that the figure of a work stoppage is not provided for at the constitutional or legal level for the heads of the Court.
In a joint statement, they argued that the ministers “cannot suspend the provision of the public service entrusted to us by the Constitution.”
To do so, they cited article 110, section X, of the Organic Law of the Judicial Branch of the Federation.
“Trusted personnel cannot even go on strike, in accordance with multiple criteria upheld by the SCJN itself, such as jurisprudence 118/2016, of the Second Chamber,” they maintain.
They also argued that failure to perform duties may be punished by impeachment, dismissal from office or disqualification from performing any other function in public service.
“In addition, the Federal Penal Code establishes as crimes for acts of corruption the failure to provide the public service that corresponds to us (article 215), or receiving undue payment of remuneration without having the right to do so (article 217 ter).”
Esquivel, Ortiz and Batres said that during the private session of the plenary session, they proposed continuing the sessions remotely.
They indicate that the SCJN has 28 distributed projects and more than 200 matters on the list in the chambers.
“It is a fundamental right of all persons to have justice administered within the timeframes and terms established by law and, therefore, the judicial bodies have the obligation to issue their decisions promptly, completely and impartially.”
Respond to ministers close to AMLO
The eight ministers who voted in favor of a Work stoppage at the SCJN Plenary They also issued a statement on the position of Ministers Esquivel, Ortiz and Batres.
“We deeply regret the disqualifications, slander and threats contained in the joint statement made public by the minority,” they said.
Regarding the alleged failure to fulfill their duties, they maintain that “the administration of justice continues with the processing and study of the matters, as well as the attention to urgent cases.”
You can read their full position statement below:
With eight votes in favor, the SCJN joins the strike agreed by the College of Secretaries y Secretaries of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, AC, and the College of Young Law Students and New Professionals of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, AC
#SCJN #joins #national #strike #controversy #judicial #reform
2024-09-11 04:40:08
What are the main reasons behind Mexico’s Supreme Court justices going on strike against President Lopez Obrador’s judicial reform?
Mexico’s Supreme Court Goes on Strike Against President’s Judicial Reform
In an unprecedented move, the ministers of Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) joined an indefinite work stoppage to protest President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s proposed judicial reform. The measure was approved with eight votes in favor and two against during a recent session [[1]]. This decision marks the first time in the country’s history that the highest court has gone on strike.
The strike is a response to the president’s controversial judicial reform, which has been met with widespread opposition from the Judicial Branch of the Federation (PJF) and other stakeholders. The reform aims to hold judges accountable, but its critics argue that it would undermine the independence of the judiciary [[3]].
Three ministers, Lenia Batres Guadarrama, Yasmin Esquivel Mossa, and Loretta Ortiz, who voted against the strike, have been criticized for their close ties to President Lopez Obrador. They argued that the strike is not constitutionally valid and would compromise the provision of public service, citing article 110, section X, of the Organic Law of the Judicial Branch of the Federation [[2]].
In response, the eight ministers who voted in favor of the strike issued a statement, saying that they “deeply regret” the disqualifications, slander, and threats made by the minority. They maintained that the administration of justice would continue despite the strike, with matters being processed and studied, and urgent cases receiving attention.
The strike has sparked a national protest, with workers from the Judicial Branch of the Federation joining the strike on November 19. The move has been met with support from protesters who have marched across Mexico, calling for the reform to be scrapped [[1]].
The Supreme Court’s decision to go on strike highlights the deepening rift between the judiciary and the executive branch in Mexico. The outcome of this crisis will have significant implications for the country’s democratic institutions and the rule of law.
What are the main reasons behind the Supreme Court justices’ strike against President Lopez Obrador’s judicial reform?
Mexico’s Supreme Court Justices Join Strike Against President Lopez Obrador’s Judicial Reform
In an unprecedented move, the ministers of Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) have joined an indefinite work stoppage in protest of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s proposed judicial reform [1[1]. The strike, which began on November 19, aims to reject the president’s reform plans, which have been met with widespread opposition from the judiciary and judicial workers.
The SCJN ministers’ decision to join the strike was approved with eight votes in favor and two against [3[3]. This marks the first work stoppage in the history of Mexico’s highest court. The ministers who voted against the strike, Lenia Batres Guadarrama, Yasmin Esquivel Mossa, and Loretta Ortiz, are seen as close to President Lopez Obrador and have argued that the work stoppage is not provided for at the constitutional or legal level for the heads of the Court [2[2].
The strike has gained significant attention in Mexico, with protesters blocking access to the Supreme Court and Congress [2[2]. The move is seen as a significant challenge to President Lopez Obrador’s authority and his plans to reform the judicial system.
The main reasons behind the strike are the concerns about the potential erosion of judicial independence and the potential politicization of the judiciary under President Lopez Obrador’s reform plans. The judiciary has long been seen as a key check on executive power in Mexico, and the proposed reforms have been criticized for seeking to undermine this independence.
As the strike continues, it remains to be seen how the situation will unfold. Will the government be able to push through its reform plans, or will the judiciary and judicial
