Indian Supreme Court has given a big blow to the controversial anchor Arnab Goswami.
The bench led by Chief Justice of India Bobde heard the petition filed by the controversial anchor Arnab Goswami in the Supreme Court.
Arnab Goswami, in the petition filed in the court, had sought an order to quash the FIR of the Mumbai Police as the case was baseless.
The court rejected the petition filed by Arnab Goswami and directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India Bobde asked Arnab Goswami during the hearing that ‘Why did you not file this petition in the Mumbai High Court? Because this matter started in Maharashtra’.
Arnab Goswami’s counsel informed the bench that the Bombay High Court had already passed an order upholding the constitutionality of the Act after which we approached the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court rejected Arnab Goswami’s plea saying that he can approach the Bombay High Court if he wants.
It should be noted that Goswami was arrested on November 4 by the Alibag police on charges of inciting suicide. After which he was granted bail by the Supreme Court on November 11.
Citizen Anve Naik and his mother Kumud committed suicide in 2018 as the companies of Goswami and the other two accused allegedly did not pay them dues.
#big #blow #Indian #anchor #Arnab #Goswami #Supreme #Court #gave #verdict
2024-09-18 05:21:37
What were the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Arnab Goswami’s petition?
Table of Contents
Supreme Court Deals a Blow to Arnab Goswami: Controversial Anchor’s Plea Rejected
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition filed by controversial anchor Arnab Goswami, dealing a blow to his efforts to quash an FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Bobde, heard the petition and directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court, citing jurisdictional issues.
Background of the Case
Arnab Goswami, known for his provocative and sensationalized reporting style, had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to quash the FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police. Goswami had claimed that the case was baseless and that he was being targeted due to his profession. However, the Supreme Court bench was not convinced by his arguments and rejected his plea.
Key Arguments Made by Arnab Goswami’s Counsel
During the hearing, Arnab Goswami’s counsel argued that the Bombay High Court had already passed an order upholding the constitutionality of the Act, following which they had approached the Supreme Court. However, the bench was not satisfied with this argument and questioned why Goswami had not approached the Mumbai High Court in the first place, given that the matter originated in Maharashtra.
Supreme Court’s Ruling
The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Bobde, rejected Arnab Goswami’s petition and directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court. This decision is seen as a significant setback for Goswami, who had hoped to get the FIR quashed through the Supreme Court.
Implications of the Ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling has significant implications for Arnab Goswami and his media organization. The rejection of his petition means that the Mumbai Police can continue to investigate the FIR filed against him, and Goswami may face legal consequences if found guilty. This ruling also sets a precedent for other cases involving high-profile individuals who may try to approach the Supreme Court to quash FIRs filed against them.
Arnab Goswami’s Controversies
Arnab Goswami is no stranger to controversy, having been involved in several high-profile cases in the past. His reporting style has been criticized for being sensationalized and provocative, and he has been accused of promoting hate speech and fake news. The current case is just the latest in a series of controversies surrounding the anchor.
Conclusion
the Supreme Court’s rejection of Arnab Goswami’s petition is a significant development that has far-reaching implications for the media industry and high-profile individuals who may try to use their influence to quash FIRs filed against them. This ruling sends a strong message that the law is above all, and that even influential individuals cannot escape accountability.
Keywords: Arnab Goswami, Supreme Court, Bombay High Court, FIR, Mumbai Police, Controversial Anchor, Media Industry, Hate Speech, Fake News.
Meta Description: The Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition filed by Arnab Goswami, controversial anchor, seeking to quash an FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police. The bench directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court, citing jurisdictional issues.
Optimized Title: Supreme Court Deals a Blow to Arnab Goswami: Controversial Anchor’s Plea Rejected
What are the main reasons behind the Supreme Court’s rejection of Arnab Goswami’s plea?
Here is a comprehensive and SEO-optimized article on the topic:
Supreme Court Deals a Blow to Arnab Goswami: Controversial Anchor’s Plea Rejected
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition filed by controversial anchor Arnab Goswami, dealing a blow to his efforts to quash an FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Bobde, heard the petition and directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court, citing jurisdictional issues.
Background of the Case
Arnab Goswami, known for his provocative and sensationalized reporting style, had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to quash the FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police. Goswami had claimed that the case was baseless and that he was being targeted due to his profession. However, the Supreme Court bench was not convinced by his arguments and rejected his plea.
Key Arguments Made by Arnab Goswami’s Counsel
During the hearing, Arnab Goswami’s counsel argued that the Bombay High Court had already passed an order upholding the constitutionality of the Act, following which they had approached the Supreme Court. However, the bench was not satisfied with this argument and questioned why Goswami had not approached the Mumbai High Court in the first place, given that the matter originated in Maharashtra.
Supreme Court’s Ruling
The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Bobde, rejected Arnab Goswami’s petition and directed the matter to be referred to the Bombay High Court. This decision is seen as a significant setback for Goswami, who had hoped to get the FIR quashed through the Supreme Court.
Implications of the Ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling has significant implications for Arnab Goswami and his media organization. The rejection of his petition means that the Mumbai Police can continue to investigate the FIR filed against him, and Goswami may face legal consequences if found guilty. This ruling also sets a precedent for other cases involving high-profile individuals who may try to approach the Supreme Court to quash FIRs filed against them.
Arnab Goswami’s Controversies
Arnab Goswami is no stranger to controversy, having been involved in several high-profile cases in the past. His reporting style has been criticized for being sensational
