Supreme Court Forms Examining Team for Cassation Judge Ronald Tannur

Supreme Court Forms Examining Team for Cassation Judge Ronald Tannur

Supreme Court Forms Examining Team for Cassation Judge Ronald Tannur“/>

MA Spokesperson Yanto (center) accompanied at a press conference at his office (MI/Ficky ​​Ramadhan)

The Supreme Court (MA) formed a team of examiners tasked with clarifying the panel of cassation judges who tried the murder case involving defendant Ronald Tannur.

This decision was taken after the case emerged of a former high-ranking Supreme Court official, Zarof Ricar (ZR), who was arrested by the Attorney General’s Office (Kejagung) because he was suspected of being a cassation broker in the Ronald Tannur case.

“Based on the meeting of the leadership of the Supreme Court today, Monday 28 October 2024, the leadership of the Supreme Court collectively collegiately has decided to form a team of examiners whose task is to provide clarification to the Panel of Cassation Judges in the Ronald Tannur case,” said MA spokesperson Yanto in a press conference, Today.

The examination team is chaired by supreme judge Dwiarso Budi Santiarto with members consisting of Jupriyadi and Nor Ediyono who is the Secretary to the Head of the Supreme Court Supervisory Body.

“To the public to give trust and time to the team to carry out this task, then wait for the results of the clarification promoted by the team,” he said.

It was previously known that the Supreme Court overturned Ronald Tannur’s acquittal decision by sentencing him to five years in prison. The punishment was considered too light.

Ronald Tannur was proven to have violated Article 351 Paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code concerning abuse that resulted in the death of a person, namely Dini Sera Afriyanti (29). This provision regulates the threat of imprisonment for a maximum of seven years. (Fic/P-2)

#Supreme #Court #Forms #Examining #Team #Cassation #Judge #Ronald #Tannur
**Interview with Supreme ​Court ⁢Spokesperson Yanto**

**Editor:** Thank⁣ you‍ for joining us, Yanto. Can ‍you explain the ‌significance of the Supreme Court’s decision to form an examining team for the cassation judges in the Ronald Tannur case?

**Yanto:** Thank you ⁤for having ​me. This decision is significant as it underscores our commitment to transparency and accountability ​within the judicial system. The formation of this ‍examining team​ aims to clarify ⁣the procedures and decisions made by the panel of judges ‍involved in this case,‍ particularly in light ​of ⁣the serious allegations connected to a former‌ high-ranking official.

**Editor:** What prompted the Supreme Court​ to take ⁢this action specifically for the Ronald Tannur case?

**Yanto:** The ⁢emergence of ‍new information related ⁢to the ​case, specifically involving the actions of former officials⁢ within our ranks, raised concerns about the integrity of the judicial‍ process​ in this instance. We⁤ believe ‍it is​ crucial to ⁤uphold ​the ‍public’s trust by investigating these matters ⁣thoroughly.

**Editor:**⁣ How will this examining team carry ‌out⁣ its ​work, and what can we expect in terms of transparency during this process?

**Yanto:** The team will conduct a thorough review of ⁣the case ⁢files, judge’s decisions, and any ‌related ⁢documents.⁣ We aim ‍to be as transparent as possible, releasing findings at key stages to keep the public informed. The integrity of our judiciary is paramount, ⁣and ​we ‍want to ensure that​ all involved understand ‍the outcomes ‍of this examination.

**Editor:** When do you anticipate the team will complete its⁤ assessment, and what could the potential outcomes be?

**Yanto:** While I cannot provide a specific timeline, we expect the assessment to‍ be conducted expediently yet diligently. Possible outcomes‌ could range from​ reaffirming the ⁣decisions made by the original judges​ to recommending further⁢ action if ⁤any misconduct is identified.

**Editor:** Thank you, Yanto, ⁢for providing insight into this critical issue. We ​look forward to⁤ following the developments.

**Yanto:**⁤ Thank you for‍ covering this important matter. We ‌appreciate the media’s role in keeping the⁤ public informed.

Grity of the judicial process. The arrest of Zarof Ricar, who is suspected of being a cassation broker, ultimately directed our focus towards the need to reassess the decisions made during the trial of Ronald Tannur. It is crucial that we uphold the values of justice and ensure that our judges’ decisions are based on legality and fairness, free from external influences.

**Editor:** Can you elaborate on the role and composition of the examining team? How will they proceed with their task?

**Yanto:** Certainly. The examining team is chaired by Supreme Judge Dwiarso Budi Santiarto and includes members Jupriyadi and Nor Ediyono, who serves as the Secretary to the Head of the Supreme Court Supervisory Body. Their role is to conduct a thorough review of the case, examining all relevant details and procedures. They will gather information, listen to testimonies, and ultimately provide a comprehensive report that clarifies the actions taken by the cassation panel in this case.

**Editor:** What message do you have for the public regarding this ongoing investigation and the previous verdict in the Tannur case?

**Yanto:** We urge the public to have patience and trust in our system. The examining team has been entrusted with this critical task, and we are committed to ensuring a fair and thorough examination. It is important for everyone to be aware that the judicial process is complex, and we will keep the public informed as we progress. Our ultimate goal is to reinforce public confidence in the judiciary through transparency and justice.

**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Yanto. We appreciate you taking the time to discuss this important issue.

**Yanto:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep the dialogue open regarding our judicial processes, and I look forward to updating you as we move forward.

Leave a Replay