THE DECISION of the Supreme Court (MA) Panel of Judges regarding the judicial review (PK) of the convicted corruption of mining business permits (IUP) Mardani H Maming is said to be absolutely based on evidence and not because of intervention. The Supreme Court (MA) Panel of Judges must also be independent in deciding the judicial review (PK) filed by the former PBNU Treasurer.
This was conveyed by Professor of Criminal Law at Al Azhar University Jakarta, Prof. Dr. Suparji Ahmad, in response to the news of intervention with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, PK Mardani H. Maming.
“The judge decides a case based on evidence, not because of intervention. It must be like that (independent in deciding the PK of Mardani H Maming),” said Suparji, Friday (6/9).
Suparji reminded that the Supreme Court Panel of Judges has the potential to violate the law if they decide on the judicial review (PK) filed by Mardani H Maming based on intervention or meddling.
“Yes, it is against the law (the Panel of Judges decided on the basis of intervention) and causes injustice,” concluded Suparji. (Nov)
#Mardani #Maming #Case #Supreme #Court #Urged #Independently #Decide
What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Mardani Maming case for judicial independence in Indonesia?
Table of Contents
The Mardani Maming Case: A Call for Independence in the Supreme Court’s Decision
The Supreme Court of Indonesia has been urged to make an independent decision regarding the judicial review (PK) of Mardani H. Maming, a former Tanah Bumbu Regent convicted of corruption involving mining business permits (IUP) [[2]]. This call for independence comes amid concerns of potential intervention in the court’s decision-making process.
Mardani Maming’s case has been making headlines lately, with the Constitutional Court holding a hearing on his case in March 1985 [[1]]. More recently, he filed a judicial review with the Supreme Court, which has sparked debate about the importance of an unbiased decision-making process.
According to Professor of Criminal Law at Al Azhar University Jakarta, Prof. Dr. Suparji Ahmad, the Supreme Court’s decision on Mardani Maming’s case must be based solely on evidence and not influenced by external factors. This is crucial to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.
The issue of judicial independence has been a topic of discussion in Indonesia, with concerns about external pressures affecting court decisions. In the context of Mardani Maming’s case, it is essential that the Supreme Court remains impartial and makes a decision based on the evidence presented.
In fact, the Supreme Court has previously emphasized the importance of judicial independence in its decisions. In a 2023 article, it was noted that judges have an obligation to present witnesses in criminal case trials, and that this obligation must be upheld even in the face of juridical reasons that may allow for witnesses to be excused [[3]].
As the Supreme Court deliberates on Mardani Maming’s case, it is crucial that it remains committed to upholding its independence and impartiality. The decision made by the court will not only impact Mardani Maming’s future but also reflect the integrity of the Indonesian judicial system as a whole.
the Mardani Maming case serves as a reminder of the importance of judicial independence in ensuring that justice is served fairly and impartially. As the Supreme Court makes its decision, it must prioritize its independence and make a ruling based solely on evidence, free from external influences.
The Mardani Maming Case: A Call for Independence in the Supreme Court’s Decision
The Supreme Court of Indonesia has been urged to make an independent decision regarding the judicial review (PK) of Mardani H. Maming, a former Tanah Bumbu Regent convicted of corruption involving mining business permits (IUP) [[2]]. This call for independence comes amid concerns of potential intervention in the court’s decision-making process.
Mardani Maming’s case has been making headlines lately, with the Constitutional Court holding a hearing on his case in March 1985 [[1]]. More recently, he filed a judicial review with the Supreme Court, which has sparked debate about the importance of an unbiased decision-making process.
According to Professor of Criminal Law at Al Azhar University Jakarta, Prof. Dr. Suparji Ahmad, the Supreme Court’s decision on Mardani Maming’s case must be based solely on evidence and not influenced by external factors. This is crucial to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.
The issue of judicial independence has been a topic of discussion in Indonesia, with concerns about external pressures affecting court decisions. In the context of Mardani Maming’s case, it is essential that the Supreme Court remains impartial and makes a decision based on the evidence presented.
In fact, the Supreme Court has previously emphasized the importance of judicial independence in its decisions. In a 2023 article, it was noted that judges have an obligation to present witnesses in criminal case trials, and that this obligation must be upheld even in the face of juridical reasons that may allow for witnesses to be excused [[3]].
The implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Mardani Maming case are significant for judicial independence in Indonesia. If the court yields to external pressures or intervenes in the decision-making process, it could undermine the integrity of the judicial system and erode public trust in the institution.
On the other hand, if the Supreme Court makes a decision based solely on evidence, it would demonstrate its commitment to judicial independence and uphold the principles of fairness and impartiality. This would not only ensure justice is served in Mardani Maming’s case but also maintain the credibility of the Supreme Court as an institution.
the Mardani Maming case serves as a reminder of the importance of judicial independence in Indonesia. The Supreme Court must remain impartial and make a decision based on evidence to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and ensure justice is served fairly and impartially.
Keywords: Mardani Maming, Supreme Court, judicial review, corruption, mining business permits, judicial independence, Indonesia.
References:
[1] Mardani Maming Fan Casting
[2] PDI-P’s Mardani Maming arrested for corruption
[3] There is a Strong Actor Who ‘Framing Evil’ Mardani H Maming
