Sundance documentary ‘The Stringer’ disputes who took ‘napalm girl’ photo in Vietnam

Sundance documentary ‘The Stringer’ disputes who took ‘napalm girl’ photo in Vietnam

The Napalm ‍Girl: A Documentary Challenges‍ a⁢ Photographic Icon

At the 2023 Sundance film Festival, a new documentary titled “The Stringer” thrust the iconic “napalm girl” photograph⁢ back ⁤into the spotlight, ⁢igniting a debate that has reverberated across ‌the journalistic​ and photographic world. For⁤ the first⁣ time⁤ in over five decades, Nguyen Thanh Nghe,‍ a freelance photographer from Vietnam,​ has ‍stepped ⁢forward to claim authorship⁢ of the‍ Pulitzer Prize-winning ‍image, contradicting the long-held attribution‌ to Associated Press (AP) staff ⁢photographer Nick‍ Ut.

Nghe, during ⁢a post-screening Q&A, stated thru a translator, “I took the photo.” ‍The claim, met with​ enthusiastic applause from the audience,⁤ has sent shockwaves through⁤ the media, forcing a re-examination of one of the moast powerful images of the ‍Vietnam War.

The documentary’s intriguing narrative depicts Nghe as a driver for ‌an NBC news crew on June 8, ‌1972, the day the now-infamous photograph of Kim Phuc ‍running through the streets of Trang ⁤Bang, fleeing a napalm attack, was captured. Nghe asserts that he sold his photo to the ⁤AP for $20,though the ‍print given to ⁣him was later destroyed by his wife.

The AP, for its part, ⁢maintains its unwavering stance on the image’s authorship, emphasizing‍ their commitment​ to⁤ ancient accuracy. ⁤A spokesperson⁤ for the AP, ‌Lauren Easton, expressed their surprise and disappointment‌ over the film’s portrayal of ‌their involvement. “As recently as December, we reiterated our request⁣ to see ‌the filmmakers’ full materials and they did not ⁣respond, nor⁣ did ⁢they ‍include AP’s full ⁤response in the⁣ film,”‌ Easton ⁣stated. “We ⁣were ⁤surprised​ and disappointed that the film portrayed⁢ AP as having reviewed the film’s materials and being dismissive of the allegations, which ⁤is fully false.”⁤

prior⁣ to ​the film’s release, the AP had conducted an ⁤extensive‌ six-month examination and concluded that there ⁤was no ​reason to believe anyone other than Ut took ⁢the‍ photograph. The⁣ news agency is ⁤now issuing a‌ call for the⁤ filmmakers to release their contributors from ​non-disclosure agreements, allowing for a transparent and complete review of the⁤ newly presented evidence.

“AP stands ready ​to review any and‍ all evidence and‌ new ‌details about this photo,” Easton declared.

Bao Nguyen, the Vietnamese American filmmaker​ behind “The Stringer,” emphasizes ⁢that while he approaches the subject with journalistic integrity, his primary motivation stems from a desire to elevate⁣ the stories ⁢of ⁤individuals​ like​ Nghe. ​ “I’m not a journalist by ‌any stretch of the creativity,” Nguyen states. “I had a healthy skepticism, as I think anyone⁣ would, ‍going against a 53-year-old truth.⁤ … But ‌as a storyteller and a filmmaker, I thought it was my both or my obligation and my privilege to be able to uplift the story of individuals⁢ like Nghe.”

This‍ ongoing controversy surrounding the authorship of the “napalm ‌girl” photograph ​highlights the importance of ⁣historical accuracy and the complexities surrounding ‌the attribution of images in the digital age. ⁢As‌ the‌ investigation unfolds, one ⁤thing remains‍ certain: the “napalm ​girl” image will continue to provoke thought and debate, reminding us ‍of the enduring‌ power of ‌photography ‍to⁢ capture⁢ the essence of human‍ experience, both in its beauty and its tragedy.

South Vietnamese forces follow terrified children, including 9-year-old Kim⁢ Phuc, center,⁢ after an aerial ⁣napalm attack on⁤ suspected Viet Cong hiding places, June 8,‌ 1972.Nick ⁤Ut ⁣/‌ AP file

A ​documentary claiming ​that ​the iconic “Napalm Girl” photo was​ not taken by Nick Ut has ignited controversy and debate. The film, which premiered⁤ at the​ Sundance Film Festival, ⁤presents evidence ‍suggesting that another photographer, ​a mystery individual named Nghe, captured the haunting image⁤ of a⁢ young ‍Kim Phuc fleeing a napalm attack. This claim ‍directly challenges the long-held narrative of Ut, a renowned‍ Associated Press photographer, as ⁤the photo’s originator.The ⁣documentary features interviews with those who worked closely with AP in⁤ Saigon⁣ at‍ the time, raising questions ⁣about the circumstances surrounding the photo’s origin. Carl‌ Robinson, ⁤a former AP photo editor, alleges‌ that he was pressured by Horst Faas, ⁣AP’s Saigon chief of photos, to credit ⁢Ut⁢ despite⁣ his doubts⁢ about the photographer’s presence at ⁢the⁤ scene.

This ‍explosive allegation has sparked ‌a fierce​ reaction from Ut’s⁢ attorney, ‌James Hornstein, who stated that “In due course, we will proceed to right this ⁢wrong in ⁤a courtroom where Nick Ut’s reputation will be vindicated.”

Adding fuel to the ‍fire,the filmmakers enlisted a French forensics team to analyze⁣ the scene ⁣depicted in the photograph. ⁣Their conclusion was⁤ that it was⁢ highly unlikely Ut could have taken the picture from​ the position he allegedly occupied.

Simultaneously occurring, the Associated Press remains resolute in supporting Ut’s‌ authorship, asserting that‍ they conducted their own thorough investigation ⁤and stand by their original claims. In response to the documentary’s claims,an ⁢AP representative stated: “They said they’re open always to examining the truth. And I think ‍it was a very reasonable thing to say,”

The documentary’s director, speaking at the Sundance Institute, underscored ‌the urgency of bringing ⁤this ⁣story⁤ to​ light.He stated, “I ‌didn’t wont‌ to‍ die before this story came‌ out. I‍ wanted to ⁤find (Nghe)⁤ and ⁣say sorry.” This ‍poignant confession‍ highlights ‌the emotional ​weight of⁢ the documentary’s allegations and the filmmaker’s personal ⁤stake in uncovering the truth.

The controversy surrounding the “Napalm Girl”⁣ photo is a testament ‍to the power of images to ‌shape historical⁢ narratives and the importance of scrutinizing those narratives ⁢with ‍a critical eye. As the documentary director stated, uncovering the truth is paramount.

The ‌Stringer: Exploring the Intricacies of On-the-Ground⁤ Reporting

In the world of journalism, capturing raw, ⁤unfiltered moments requires a unique breed of reporter: one who thrives in the heat of the action. These individuals, often referred to ‌as “stringers,” provide vital⁤ perspectives ⁣and firsthand accounts from the ground, shaping our understanding of events as they unfold. While their work is ‍frequently enough⁣ behind-the-scenes, their contributions are invaluable to the journalistic landscape.

One such upcoming project, “The Stringer,” promises to⁢ delve into the lives and experiences of these unsung⁢ heroes.‌ The film, while yet to have ‌a ⁣confirmed release date, aims to shed light on the challenges and rewards they face ​in their pursuit of truth.

“Things happen in the field ⁢in the ⁢heat of the ⁣moment…

We’re all stronger if we ⁤examine ourselves, ask tough questions, and we’re open and honest‌ about what‍ goes on in our profession. Now more than ever, I⁤ would ⁣argue,”⁣

How does “The stringer” aim too shed light on the often-overlooked contributions of independent‍ journalists?

The Stringer: An Interview With ​Bao Nguyen

Bao⁢ Nguyen,the Vietnamese American filmmaker behind ​the upcoming documentary “The Stringer,” sat down ⁢with Archyde‌ to discuss his latest project.

The ⁤film promises to explore ​the ​lives of “stringers,” journalists who work independently, often in ​high-risk environments, contributing vital on-the-ground reporting.

“The Stringer” ⁢is a timely project in a ‍world grappling with the evolving landscape of journalism. Nguyen delves into ⁤the unique challenges adn rewards faced by these unsung heroes.

Archyde: Why were ​you drawn ‍to the story of‌ stringers for your new film?

Bao Nguyen: ‌ I’ve always ​been fascinated by the stories told from the ⁢ground up. I wanted to shed light on⁤ the individuals ‍who often work behind ⁣the scenes, bringing crucial details to the world.

Stringers operate⁢ in precarious environments, facing‍ danger​ and adversity to deliver authentic accounts of events. I believe their experiences ⁣deserve to be seen and⁢ heard.

Archyde: what are ⁤some‍ of the biggest challenges stringers face in their work?

Bao⁤ Nguyen: Stringers often work with limited resources and face immense pressure to ⁢deliver accurate and timely information, often under difficult⁤ circumstances. They may not have the same level‌ of support or protection as full-time journalists employed by major organizations.

There’s also a constant risk, especially when reporting on conflicts or sensitive issues.

What makes their contributions ⁤so vital to the journalistic landscape?

Bao Nguyen: Stringers ​offer a unique perspective. They ⁤are ⁣deeply embedded in their communities, possessing firsthand knowledge and insights that can be invaluable for⁣ understanding events as ⁢they unfold. ‌

Their on-the-ground work often provides context and‌ nuance that ‍broader narratives may miss.

I wanted to create a film that not only shares their stories but also helps the public understand the‌ importance‍ of ​their contributions to journalism.

Leave a Replay