STT knowledgeable the Seimas Fee that it can not present legal intelligence materials

Final week, within the letter addressed to the fee by the top of STT, Linas Pernavs, which was seen by BNS, it’s also indicated that STT is evaluating whether or not it could declassify a part of the accessible materials on the request of politicians, and likewise replies that it can not give them particular solutions as to what was the topic of the legal intelligence investigation.

The STT replied to the fee’s request to submit the fabric collected through the legal investigation, that solely the summarized data ready on the idea of the legal intelligence materials, and never the investigation information itself, could be supplied to establishments that don’t conduct legal investigation.

STT additionally factors out that the certificates that was despatched to the Normal Prosecutor’s Workplace and the data destruction paperwork and all different remaining case supplies include details about the objects of the investigation, the strategies of knowledge gathering, measures, ways, and secret contributors, due to this fact particular paperwork can’t be submitted to the fee.

In response to the informant’s details about the actions of the heads of the VSD in checking Gitanas Nausėda’s atmosphere throughout his candidacy for the management of the nation, STT began a nine-month legal intelligence investigation, that is confirmed by the previous heads of the Normal Prosecutor’s Workplace who testified to the fee.

Each the prosecutors and the previous head of the STT additionally testified to the fee that the legal intelligence investigation was terminated with out figuring out any indicators of a legal act. The rapporteur takes the place that the legal intelligence investigation ought to have become a pre-trial investigation.

In its response to the Seimas fee, STT additionally informs that a part of the data collected through the legal intelligence investigation is destroyed, because the legislation specifies.

In response to the letter, through the first destruction, all data collected concerning the object of legal intelligence was destroyed. Through the second destruction, data collected concerning the personal life of people was destroyed.

The Seimas fee, which beforehand heard the top of the Particular Investigation Service L. Pernavas in a closed session, requested him to declassify the fabric he submitted.

The non permanent fee of the Seimas is clarifying the data of VSD reporter T. Gailius concerning the actions of the division heads in checking the atmosphere of G. Nausėdas, who was a presidential candidate on the time, the financing of the previous presidential elections, and different points.

Former and present heads of the prosecutor’s workplace, STT, in addition to the whistleblower who determined to not cover his identification, the previous head of one of many VSD boards, T. Gailius, have already testified to the fee.

Whereas testifying to the fee, T. Gailius confirmed that whereas working in intelligence he had seen data concerning the probably non-transparent financing of the 2019 presidential election marketing campaign, however didn’t single out a selected candidate.

Additionally, T. Gailius stated that he suspected that his managers may have dedicated a disciplinary violation or perhaps a crime after they commissioned an inspection of G. Nausėda’s atmosphere and probably handed the inspection outcomes on to 3rd events who should not have the best to work with labeled data. That is why T. Gailius stated that he turned to politicians and have become a speaker.

After the testimony of T. Gailius, the VSD reiterated that they adopted the legislation when checking the atmosphere of G. Nausėdas.

Within the ebook “The Speaker and the President” printed at first of 2023, a part of the content material of which relies on the tales of T. Gailius, questions are raised concerning the transparency of the financing of the election marketing campaign of G. Nausėdas.

G. Nausėda rejects suspicions about probably non-transparent financing of the marketing campaign, and likewise claims that he’s able to reply the fee’s questions in writing.