The case is still pending in the Saudi sports judiciary
Alaa Kanno’s statements about the issue of his brother Muhammad, who is disputed between Al-Hilal and Al-Nasr, ignited the controversy once again over the file currently under consideration before the Saudi Sports Arbitration Center.
Alaa Kanno had spoken during a space in Twitter, denying all the accusations that had been raised against him recently, noting that he did not sign the contract with Al-Nasr instead of Muhammad, and stressing that there were no white papers in the case file. (More details here)
Sports critic Ahmed Al-Kamoukh commented on these statements by emphasizing that Muhammad Kno was the one who signed his contract with Al-Nasr with his own hands, and called on Al-Hilal not to be stubborn and stubborn and to admit the mistake committed in the case.
Editor’s Picks
Kamukh: Enough stubbornness, O Crescent, bear the consequences of your mistake
The famous journalist explained, during his statements to the 24 Saudi Sports Channel, that Al-Nasr did not commit any violation in his negotiations and contract with Kno, and that Al-Hilal was the wrong party because he initially refused Kno’s requests to renew his contract, but retracted his opinion after the player signed Al-Nasr and discovered how much his opponent benefited from that deal and loss. which he will incur.
He added, “We all know that Muhammad Kno was the one who signed and stamped his hand, and we all know that all the contractual measures taken by Al-Nasr were completely regular and that the club did not commit a single violation that gives Al Hilal a loophole to spoil the deal.”
He continued, “Perseverance is something that does not befit the principles of Al Hilal. Al Hilal is a club that makes mistakes and will not be better than Chelsea, Atletico Madrid and Borussia Dortmund, and all of them were deprived of restrictions for a while. Whoever errs should bear the consequences of this mistake, not stubbornness against him, criminalizing everyone and trying to link the matter to Kno’s brother.”
“Al-Hilal saw that he made a mistake in not renewing Al-Hilal’s contract and after that he realized that the player was a loss for him and a gain for the victory, and he was ready to pay the price of renewing the player’s contract after knowing that he had signed for Al-Nasr, and I confirm again that the Sports Arbitration Center will confirm the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Chamber, because there is no white paper and there is no For mistakes in the contract of victory, but victory is right to demand the full amount, which is 34.5 million Saudi riyals.”
What are the decisions of the Saudi Football Association regarding the Kno case?
The Dispute Resolution Chamber of the Saudi Football Federation clarified that Kanoo terminated his signed contract with Al-Nasr on the third of last January without any legitimate reason, and decided to stop it for a period of 4 months and prevent Al Hilal from registering new players during the next two transfer periods.
The committee obligated the player and Al-Hilal to jointly pay a financial compensation to Al-Nasr of 27 million Saudi riyals, which is 7.5 million riyals, the value of the amount received by the player when submitting the contract, and 19.5 million riyals the value of his contract with Al-Alam.
The two clubs appealed the decision, with Al Hilal asking to cancel the decisions in full and to reconsider the case, while Al-Nasr seeks compensation of 34 million Saudi riyals and 27 million.
Read also |