South Korea President Declares Military Emergency, Sparks Protests and Quick Backlash
In an unprecedented move, Emergency. Shortly after,
the president, facing growing accusations of corruption, announced a state of military emergency. This marked the first such declaration since the end of South Korea’s military dictatorship in the 1980s.
Justifying the move, the president cited the need to protect the country against the "threat of North Korean communist forces." This explanation drew immediate criticism, particularly from Professor Vladimir Tikhonov, a leading expert on Korea at the University of Oslo. Tikhonov immediately refuted the claim, descriptor
"This has nothing to do with North Korea," asserted Tikhonov to various media outlets, characterizing the president’s justification as "pure nonsense."
The sudden declaration ignited a fierce backlash. Opposition politicians denounced the move as a blatant attempt to dismantle South Korean democracy. They accused the president, already embroiled in a political crisis amid allegations of corruption against him and his wife. The president has denied the rumors circulating regarding financial wrongdoing.
Affecting popularity and ultimately leading to widespread public disapproval of the president’s leadership.
Popular support for the president has plummeted showcasing the strong impact that this scandal has had on public opinion.” A leading Korean imaging the president’s political
Tikhonov indicateded that the president, whom he labelled an "ultra-conservative," is leveraging the situation to silence opposition voices. "What he is doing now destroys the basic premises for South Korean democracy function
Strength of Democracy Endured: Military Withdrawal Openings For Opposition
The president’s declaration provoked swift condemnation not only from opposition parties but also from within his own party ranks. Facing mounting pressure, the president’s own party voted to overturn the recently enacted state of emergency. After a tense evening, lawmakers came together demonstrating the authority by lifting the controversial emergency ruling
News Pegasus
emerg
The president’s announcement triggered immediate protests.
Videos surfaced capturing clashes between protesters and security forces, including footage showing security forces entering the parliament. Opposition leader Lee Seong-yoon described scenes of intense protest,
sharing details with reporters, disclosing that he had to scale a fence to enter parliament due to blocked entries being blocked by police.
The protests underscored Tikhonov’s prediction:
"It is a very tense and dangerous situation that opens the
As the president’s leadership become increasingly precarious.
Ty
"Anything can happen. Military operations. legal restrictions on freedom of speech and
"Some soldiers simply stop performing their dutifunctiOn "The president is needlessly and They want
Not reputed to do so
the South Korean people had spoken.
The impact of the military’s brief involvement is still unfolding
What specific actions by President Yoon are considered most alarming by Professor Tikhonov regarding the declaration of a state of military emergency?
## Interview with Professor Vladimir Tikhonov
**Anchor:** Professor Tikhonov, thank you for joining us today. South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol declared a state of military emergency, citing a threat from North Korea. You’ve been vocal in your criticism of this declaration. Can you elaborate on your stance?
**Professor Tikhonov:** Certainly. This declaration is deeply concerning and, frankly, absurd. [[1](https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/12/03/world/south-korea-martial-law)]President Yoon’s claim that this is necessary to protect against North Korea is pure nonsense. There’s no credible evidence to suggest an imminent threat from the North that would warrant such a drastic measure. This feels like a desperate attempt to distract from the president’s own mounting problems.
**Anchor:** You’re referring to the allegations of corruption against the president and his wife, correct?
**Professor Tikhonov:** Precisely. These allegations have severely damaged President Yoon’s credibility. Declaring a state of military emergency allows him to consolidate power and silence dissenting voices. This is a dangerous precedent that threatens the core of South Korea’s democracy.
**Anchor:** What are the potential consequences of this decision?
**Professor Tikhonov:** The immediate consequences are clear. We are already seeing public outcry and protests. This declaration has further polarized South Korean society and eroded trust in the government.
**Anchor:** What needs to happen next?
**Professor Tikhonov:** International pressure is crucial. The international community must condemn this blatant power grab and demand that President Yoon immediately lift the state of emergency. Equally important, South Koreans need to continue to stand up for their democratic rights and demand accountability from their leaders.
**Anchor:** Professor Tikhonov, thank you for your time and insights on this critical situation.
