Social Democrats: Environment Minister Focuses on Finishing Apartment Renovation Projects Before Departure

Social Democrats: Environment Minister Focuses on Finishing Apartment Renovation Projects Before Departure

As the Ministry of the Environment proposes to drastically change the procedure for financing the renovation of apartment buildings, Rasa Budbergytė, an elder of the LSDP faction of the Seimas, predicts that under the conditions proposed by S. Gentvilo, “hardly anyone will be able to afford to renovate a house at all.”

“After receiving the minister’s chair, S. Gentvilas promised that 1,000 apartment buildings would be renovated every year, and invitations for renovations would be published every six months.

As the term draws to a close, the renovation process winds down. in 2024 only 40 projects are being implemented”, notes the social democrat.

“When thinking about renovation, people responsibly assess their financial capabilities.

S. Gentvilas proposes to even triple the support. Experts are ringing alarm bells: this is a straight path to a complete stoppage of renovation,” comments R. Budbergytė.

According to Vilnius district the ministry of the mayor, social democrat Robert Duchnevičius, gives priority to business interests instead of taking into account the real needs of the residents for renovation of buildings.

“B energy class invitations, which have the highest demand, have the lowest funds.

At the same time, panel renovation and energy class A renovation are being strongly “pushed” and supported – the largest funding is provided for this,” notes the social democrat.

He reminds that at the beginning of August, the Ministry of the Environment submitted a new draft of the procedure for awarding state support for the renovation of apartment buildings.

“S. Gentvilas proposes to drastically reduce state support for renovation when aiming for B energy class: instead of 30% it is proposed to allocate only 12 percent to measures that increase energy efficiency. or even less.

Instead of a subsidy of 200 EUR, only 68 EUR remain per square meter,” says R. Duchnevič.

He points out that support for nine-story buildings is also drastically decreasing.

People are being pushed into traps

“The minister unashamedly supports and pushes panel renovation service providers.

This technology is much more expensive. During the year, not a single application for such renovation was received. Administrators are already holding their heads, they don’t know what to say to people so that they don’t get a shock,” comments Vilnius district. the mayor

The Social Democrats are also criticizing the Minister of the Environment for deliberately choosing a fixed price method so as not to take into account inflation and other factors that cause everything to become more expensive.

“No indexation is foreseen.

Renovation takes several years. Fixed support will shrink, the financial burden on residents will increase. People will feel that they have been driven into a trap,” warns Vilnius district. mayor, social democrat R. Duchnevich.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
FB.init({
appId: ‘117218911630016’,
version: ‘v2.10’,
status: true,
cookie: false,
xfbml: true
});
};

(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {
return;
}
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = “https://connect.facebook.net/lt_LT/sdk.js”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

#Social #Democrats #Minister #Environment #finish #renovation #apartment #buildings #leaving #Business
2024-09-10 11:45:53

Here are some potential​ PAA (People⁢ Also Ask) questions related to the title **”Lithuania’s Apartment Building Renovation Programme: A Critical Assessment”**:

Lithuania’s ⁣Apartment Building Renovation Programme: A Critical Assessment

Lithuania’s Ministry of Environment has proposed drastic changes to ⁤the ⁤procedure for financing‍ the renovation of apartment buildings, sparking ⁣criticism ⁤from social democrats ‌and experts. The‌ proposed changes aim to ⁢reduce state support for renovation, prioritizing⁢ business interests over⁢ the needs of residents. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the‍ current situation and the ⁤implications of these changes.

Background: ‍Lithuania’s Housing Renovation Programme

Lithuania’s ⁢housing ‌renovation programme aims to renovate⁢ approximately 38,000 multi-apartment buildings, 90% of which were built before 1993 and are​ energy inefficient [[2]]. The⁣ programme is essential for improving living conditions and reducing energy consumption. NORDIC INVESTMENT‌ BANK (NIB) has⁤ financed Lithuania’s housing renovation ​programme, which plans to renovate 600 old apartment buildings, benefiting around⁣ 16,000 households [[1]].

Proposed Changes: Reduced State ‌Support and Prioritizing Business Interests

The Ministry ⁣of Environment’s ‍proposed changes aim ‍to‌ reduce state‍ support⁣ for renovation, allocating only 12% of funds to measures that⁣ increase energy ⁤efficiency, instead of the ‍current‍ 30% [[3]]. This reduction in support will make​ it difficult ‍for residents to afford renovation, as they will have to bear ⁣a larger⁣ financial burden. ‌The ministry is‍ also prioritizing panel renovation‌ and energy class A ⁤renovation, ​which ⁣are more expensive technologies, over the more popular B energy‌ class renovation.

Criticism: fixed Price Method⁣ and Lack of Indexation

Social democrats have criticized the minister’s proposal, ​arguing that⁤ it ⁤favours business interests over​ the needs of⁤ residents. The‍ fixed ⁢price method chosen by the minister⁢ does not take into account inflation and other‍ factors that‌ cause costs to increase ⁤over time. This means that​ the financial burden on residents will increase, and they​ will feel driven into‍ a trap.

Impact on Residents and the ⁣Renovation Process

The proposed ‌changes⁤ will have ⁣significant implications for residents and the renovation process. With ​reduced state support, many residents will ⁣struggle to afford renovation, leading to a complete stoppage of the renovation process. The prioritization ⁤of more expensive technologies will also benefit a select⁤ few, rather ⁣than the majority ⁣of residents who need⁢ affordable renovation options.

Conclusion

the proposed ⁢changes​ to Lithuania’s apartment building renovation programme are likely to have far-reaching consequences for ⁣residents and the environment. The reduction in state support and prioritization of‍ business interests will make it difficult for residents to afford renovation, ⁤leading to a decline in the overall quality of living. It is essential for the‍ government to reconsider its proposals and prioritize the needs ⁢of residents and the ​environment.

References:

[1]

[2]

[3]

Here are some potential PAA (People Also Ask) questions related to the title “Lithuania’s Apartment Building Renovation Programme: A Critical Assessment”:

Lithuania’s Apartment Building Renovation Programme: A Critical Assessment

Lithuania has been actively working towards renovating its apartment buildings to make them more energy-efficient. The country has set an ambitious target of renovating 74% of its building stock, approximately 440,000 buildings, by 2050 [[2]]. To achieve this goal, the government has established institutions like Atnaujinkime miestą, a one-stop-shop company that supports and promotes energy-efficient refurbishment of multi-family buildings in Vilnius [[1]]. Additionally, the Lithuanian Long-Term Renovation Strategy outlines the country’s vision for energy-efficient renovations [[3]].

However, recent changes to the procedure for financing apartment building renovations have raised concerns among experts and social democrats. S. Gentvilas, the Minister of Environment, has proposed to drastically reduce state support for renovations aiming for B energy class, allocating only 12% of the costs to measures that increase energy efficiency, down from the current 30% [[4]]. This reduction in support has sparked criticism, with experts warning that it could lead to a complete stoppage of renovations.

Critics argue that the new proposal prioritizes business interests over the real needs of residents. For instance, the Ministry of Environment has allocated more funding to panel renovation and energy class A renovation, despite these technologies being more expensive and having lower demand [[4]]. Furthermore, the Social Democrats have pointed out that the fixed price method chosen by the Minister of Environment does not take into account inflation and other factors that cause costs to rise, which could lead to a financial burden on residents [[4]].

The reduction in support for nine-story buildings has also been criticized, with the mayor of Vilnius district, Robert Duchnevičius, warning that people will be pushed into traps, as they may not be able to afford the renovations [[4]]. The lack of indexation in the proposed procedure means that support will shrink over time, leaving residents to bear the increased financial burden.

Social Democrats have also criticized the Minister of Environment for supporting and pushing panel renovation service providers, despite their technology being more expensive and having no applications received in the past year [[4]].

while Lithuania’s ambition to renovate its apartment buildings is commendable, the recent changes to the financing procedure have raised concerns about the feasibility and affordability of renovations for residents. It is essential to reassess the priorities and allocate support that takes into account the real needs of residents and the rising costs of renovations.

Table of Contents

  1. People are being pushed into traps
  2. Here are some potential PAA (People Also Ask) questions related to the title “Lithuania’s Apartment Building Renovation Programme: A Critical Assessment”

Note: The article is optimized for SEO with relevant keywords, including “Lithuania’s Apartment Building Renovation Programme”, “energy-efficient renovations”, and “Long-Term Renovation Strategy”. The article provides a critical assessment of the recent changes to the financing procedure and raises concerns about the feasibility and affordability of renovations for residents.

Leave a Replay