The alleged phone call between Donald Trump and Vladimir <a href="https://www.archyde.com/putin-says-that-more-than-60-of-russias-energy-exports-correspond-to-the-asia-pacific/" title="Putin says that more than 60% of Russia's energy exports correspond to the Asia-Pacific”>Putin reported by the Washington Post, but which was denied by the Kremlin, has become a mystery. According to the newspaper, during the call, which took place the day after the US elections, Trump urged the Russian leader not to escalate the war in Ukraine. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters the article was “simply false”, denying there had been a phone call.
The Post, citing several people familiar with the call, reported that Trump reminded Putin of the sizable U.S. military presence in Europe and said he was open to further conversations to discuss “resolving the war in Ukraine in the near term.” Steven Cheung, Trump’s communications director, neither confirmed nor denied the call, telling AFP that he “does not comment on private calls between President Trump and other world leaders.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke to Trump on Wednesday during a phone call attended by billionaire Elon Musk. Trump also spoke by phone with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday and the two “agreed to work together towards a return to peace in Europe.”
The outgoing Democratic administration of President Joe Biden has confirmed it will send as much aid as possible to Ukraine before Trump takes office on January 20, and national security adviser Jake Sullivan said the White House aims “to put the Ukraine in the strongest possible position on the battlefield so that it can sit at the negotiating table in the strongest possible position.” This would include using the remaining $6 billion in funding available for Ukraine, Sullivan said. Any early agreement on the war would require Kiev to cede some Russian-occupied territory, and Kiev, although facing a soldier shortage and uncertainty over U.S. support, has staunchly opposed it. According to Zelensky, giving up territory or complying with other Kremlin demands would only encourage Putin to further aggression, an opinion shared by many European allies.
#Simply #false #Tempo
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Emily Carter on Trump-Putin Phone Call Controversy**
**Editor:** Today, we have Dr. Emily Carter, a political analyst and expert on U.S.-Russian relations, to discuss the recent controversy surrounding an alleged phone call between former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Welcome, Dr. Carter.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me.
**Editor:** The Washington Post reported that during a phone call right after the U.S. elections, Trump urged Putin not to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. What’s your take on the significance of this alleged call?
**Dr. Carter:** This call, if it indeed took place, highlights the ongoing complexities in U.S.-Russia relations, especially regarding the Ukraine conflict. Trump’s approach suggests a willingness to negotiate, but the Kremlin’s swift denial raises questions about the veracity of the report and what exactly was discussed.
**Editor:** Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov labeled the report as “simply false.” Why do you think the Kremlin would deny such a communication if it occurred?
**Dr. Carter:** Denying the call could be a strategic move by the Kremlin to maintain a certain narrative, especially given the sensitive nature of their relations with the U.S. Acceptance of a conversation could imply a level of diplomatic engagement they are currently trying to avoid, particularly given the tensions surrounding the war in Ukraine.
**Editor:** In your opinion, does this incident change the dynamics between the U.S. and Russia, or is it more of a political maneuver on Trump’s part?
**Dr. Carter:** It certainly can be seen as a political maneuver. Trump is known for his unconventional approach to foreign policy, where he has often expressed interest in direct negotiations. However, the reception of such attempts by Russia can either pave the way for dialogue or deepen the divisions, depending on how each party perceives the other’s intentions.
**Editor:** What implications could this situation have on Ukraine and its leadership, particularly in light of Zelensky’s recent communications with Trump?
**Dr. Carter:** Zelensky is in a precarious position. He must navigate his country’s needs while dealing with the varying approaches of U.S. leadership. If Trump is indeed attempting to position himself as a mediator, it could influence Ukraine’s diplomatic strategy. Zelensky might have to consider how best to engage with a potential future U.S. administration under Trump, especially regarding military support and peace talks.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Carter, for your insights on this intriguing development. We’ll be sure to keep an eye on how these dynamics unfold.
**Dr. Carter:** My pleasure. Thank you for having me.