2023-06-21 02:16:42
“I am a complete defender of the claims for alimony being made public, especially those that are not fulfilled,” said journalist Hugo Valencia in Zona de Estrellas.
«Savka Pollak did it, Pamela Díaz did it, and I do not listen to Mr. Mauricio Israel who treats them as spiteful. Sabrina Sosa, his panel partner, did it. And I have not heard Mauricio treat these women as spiteful and meddlesome, ”she added.
The professional refers to the statements of Mauricio Israel in the program Follow me and follow you, where he gave all his favor to the version of Iván Núñez’s girlfriend, who stated that he recently separated from the journalist – with whom he has a two-year-old son – because «I want to get out of Iván’s problems with his ex-wife. Let them fix their issues.”
Israel stated on screen: “Marlene de la Fuente is very hurt because Iván Núñez had a child with someone else and they had not yet separated.”
Subsequently, in Zona de Estrellas they analyzed the issue and expressed:
Daniela Aranguiz: “Mauricio Israel felt identified”
Hugo Valencia: “So there is a machismo…”
Mario Velasco: «The appearance that Marlene de la Fuente had on the Me Late program (in October 2022), went a little further than clarifying what was happening between her and the father of her children in legal terms. My opinion. Giving a number of details regarding the break and how her relationship with her ex-husband Iván Núñez was coming, which seemed a bit too much to me when there are children involved.
«Because children, if they already have access to social networks or go to school, you give other people tools, beyond showing something, that can hit your children very hard. And that’s where I saw it and I was kicked “
Valencia: “Perhaps there were details that were excessive, but that argument of ‘do not expose the lawsuit, do not count what they owe you, because shame, what you are going to expose your children’… Sorry, those who expose the children are the parents who They don’t pay the pension
Velasco: “But here there are two versions that are opposed”
Valencia: “But there is an opinion of justice”
Velasco: “Sometimes there is no general rule to determine how much one should spend to his ex-partner”
Aranguiz: “It’s a percentage”
Velasco: “But what Iván Núñez says is: ‘I gave this, this and this to my ex-wife, and the court determined that I should give her a little more and that is why she is going to take part of my salary, perfect.’
“One also has to put the background on the table and say ‘Iván is defending himself once morest this accusation and is saying that the press speaks without knowledge of the cause.’ Because he details, he leaves him a house of I don’t know how many meters, he pays the school fees, the isapres, and adding all that up, maybe he does enter the percentage ”
Aranguiz: “Children do not have to change their lifestyle for any reason, especially if the father decided to have a parallel life”
Velasco: “And do you think that in the case of Iván they have changed it? We do not know”.
1687336024
#Marlene #Fuente #program #Late #gave #number #details.. #bit #children #involved #Mario #Velasco #Glamorama
