The fire started in a bathroom in an apartment on the third floor of the block of flats, says operations manager Gabriel Langfeldt in the police log. The fire spread further to the roof structure and the walls inside the bathroom.
In addition, a water pipe burst in connection with the incident, which caused a water leak.
– So far we are talking about three apartments that will become uninhabitable due to the water leak from the apartment where the fire broke out, writes the Oslo police district.
The 110 central office in Oslo confirms that there are three apartments that have been completely damaged. About an hour after the police first reported the fire, the fire control center confirms that it has been extinguished.
Driver post-shutdown
– We are now in the post-extinguishing phase, where we work, among other things, to salvage valuables and to limit secondary damage as a result of water, writes the 110 center on X.
The block of flats in question dates from 1890, which means that there are many cavities in the building. This made it more complex for the fire service to gain control of where the fire actually was.
The fire brigade remains on the scene for quite some time, even if the fire is extinguished, to make sure that it does not spread to other places.
No one seriously injured
All the residents of the apartment building were evacuated as a result of the fire.
A total of three people were considered to be slightly injured, according to the police, and these were examined by the ambulance at the scene. The police are opening a case.
In connection with the efforts of the emergency services, the intersection of Erling Skjalgssons gate and Elisenbergveien was closed.
#apartments #uninhabitable #fire #apartment #building #Frogner #Oslo
– How can communities effectively balance the preservation of older architecture with the need for enhanced safety regulations?
**Interview with Gabriel Langfeldt, Operations Manager, Oslo Police District**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Gabriel. Can you give us a brief overview of what transpired during the fire incident in the apartment building?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** Certainly. The fire began in a third-floor bathroom, quickly spreading to the roof structure and walls. Unfortunately, a water pipe also burst, leading to significant water damage that has left three apartments uninhabitable. The fire was extinguished about an hour after we were alerted.
**Editor:** What challenges did the fire brigade face in controlling the fire?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** The building, dating back to 1890, has many cavities that complicated the firefighters’ efforts to detect and control the fire’s spread. Even after extinguishing the flames, the fire brigade remained on-site to prevent any potential resurgence.
**Editor:** It’s a relief to hear there were no serious injuries. What can you tell us about the residents affected?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** All residents were evacuated safely. While three individuals experienced minor injuries, they were treated at the scene. The priority was to ensure everyone’s safety during the chaotic situation.
**Editor:** As the investigation unfolds, is there anything specific you believe should be looked into regarding fire safety in older buildings like this one?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** Absolutely. This incident raises significant questions about fire safety measures in historical constructions. We need to consider whether current fire regulations are adequate for such buildings, especially regarding their design and maintenance.
**Editor:** That’s a critical point. How do you think the community should address fire safety in old structures moving forward?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** It would be beneficial for discussions to happen among community leaders, building owners, and fire safety experts, focusing on regular inspections and possible upgrades to safety systems in older buildings.
**Editor:** Given this scenario, what are your thoughts on how residents and local authorities might better prepare for potential future incidents in similar buildings? Should there be stricter regulations on living conditions in such historical buildings?
**Gabriel Langfeldt:** I think it’s essential to foster a dialogue about balancing preservation with safety. Stricter regulations could be a solution, but they also need to consider the architectural integrity and historical value of these buildings. It’s a nuanced issue that warrants thorough community discussion.
**Editor:** Thank you, Gabriel, for your insights. Readers, what are your thoughts? Should stricter fire safety regulations be implemented for older buildings, or do you believe current measures are sufficient? Let us know your opinion in the comments.
