Several apartments uninhabitable after a fire in an apartment building on Frogner in Oslo

The fire started in a bathroom in an apartment on the third floor of the block of flats, says operations manager Gabriel Langfeldt in the police log. The fire spread further to the roof structure and the walls inside the bathroom.

In addition, a water pipe burst in connection with the incident, which caused a water leak.

– So far we are talking about three apartments that will become uninhabitable due to the water leak from the apartment where the fire broke out, writes the Oslo police district.

The 110 central office in Oslo confirms that there are three apartments that have been completely damaged. About an hour after the police first reported the fire, the fire control center confirms that it has been extinguished.

Driver post-shutdown

– We are now in the post-extinguishing phase, where we work, among other things, to salvage valuables and to limit secondary damage as a result of water, writes the 110 center on X.

The block of flats in question dates from 1890, which means that there are many cavities in the building. This made it more complex for the fire service to gain control of where the fire actually was.

The fire brigade remains on the scene for quite some time, even if the fire is extinguished, to make sure that it does not spread to other places.

No one seriously injured

All the residents of the apartment building were evacuated as a result of the fire.

A total of three people were considered to be slightly injured, according to the police, and these were examined by the ambulance at the scene. The police are opening a case.

In connection with the efforts of the emergency services, the intersection of Erling Skjalgssons gate and Elisenbergveien was closed.

#apartments #uninhabitable #fire #apartment #building #Frogner #Oslo

How ⁢are you coordinating support for residents⁢ displaced by the fire and ⁢water damage?

**Interview with Gabriel Langfeldt,⁤ Operations Manager**

**Interviewer:** Thank⁣ you for joining us,⁤ Gabriel. Can you walk us through ‌the initial ⁣response‌ to the fire‌ that broke⁣ out in the apartment building?

**Gabriel Langfeldt:** Of course. The fire started in ‌a bathroom on the third floor of the building. Our teams were dispatched immediately, and the situation escalated as the ⁤fire ⁢spread ⁤to the roof structure ⁣and ⁢internal walls. The complexity⁣ of ‌the building, which dates‍ back to 1890, presented challenges due ⁣to numerous cavities that made ⁢it ⁢harder to locate the ⁢fire’s extent.

**Interviewer:** It must have been quite a chaotic scene. What measures⁢ were taken to ensure the ​safety of the residents?

**Gabriel Langfeldt:** All residents were evacuated safely. I’m relieved to say that while three individuals were reported with minor injuries, there were no serious injuries. Emergency services worked quickly⁢ to not only ​extinguish the flames but also ⁢manage ​the aftermath, especially with the burst water pipe that caused further complications.

**Interviewer:** ‌Speaking of the water⁢ leak, it⁣ seems that three apartments ⁣may now be uninhabitable. ⁤What are the next steps for the affected residents?

**Gabriel Langfeldt:** Yes, unfortunately, three apartments‍ will be​ uninhabitable‌ due to water damage. We are currently in‍ the post-extinguishing ⁢phase, where our teams work⁤ to salvage valuables and mitigate‌ secondary​ damage. The municipality has resources for‍ displaced⁤ residents, and we’re coordinating with them to​ provide support.

**Interviewer:** With the fire ​now extinguished, how is the fire‌ brigade ensuring that there are no lingering‌ threats at the site?

**Gabriel Langfeldt:** We remain on⁤ the scene ⁢to monitor‌ for any hotspots and ensure the fire doesn’t⁢ reignite or spread‌ to other areas. ⁢Safety is our priority,​ and we want to be thorough in our assessment before⁤ leaving the vicinity.

**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing that,‌ Gabriel. Lastly, this incident raises‍ questions about fire safety in older​ buildings. ‌Do you think more stringent regulations should be enforced to ‌prevent such ⁢occurrences in the future?

**Gabriel Langfeldt:** ​That’s an important​ topic for discussion. ​Older ⁤buildings have ‍unique⁢ challenges, and it’s crucial for policymakers and building owners to assess current safety standards. We’d love to hear the community’s thoughts— should there⁣ be more ‌regulations‌ or support for ‍retrofitting these older structures?

**Interviewer:** Thank you,‍ Gabriel, for the insightful ​discussion. Readers, what are your ​thoughts on fire safety regulations ‌for older buildings? Should owners‌ be required to upgrade‌ their systems, ​or⁤ is enough being done already? We want to​ hear your opinions!

Leave a Replay