The court ordered 6 months in prison, a fine of 1 hundred thousand. The gang hired Pao to knock down Thai League 2 footballers, the defendant had never served a sentence before and was sentenced to two years’ probation.
On 19 January 2022, the Criminal Court, Ratchadaphisek Road, the court made an appointment to read the judgment. The case for hiring a biased judge The Black Case, Aug.1105/2019, in which the Criminal Case 6 prosecutor is the plaintiff once morest Mr. Nattakorn Chimpali, a former judge. Therdsak Thongklum, former referee, and Pol Maj. or Mr. Pongphan Wongsuban, a former football club executive Together as a defendant under the Professional Sports Promotion Act 2013, Section 66 and the Criminal Code, Sections 84, 91
From the case on April 20, 2018, the 1st and 3rd defendants have given, asked for or accepted that money or assets or any other benefits Mr. Surasak Hassajan, the second defendant, who will be the judge of the Thai League 2 (T2) professional football match between the Samut Sakhon FC team and the Rayong FC football club team, which will compete on the day On April 21, 2018, around 7:00 p.m. at the Central Stadium, Samut Sakhon Province The amount of money to be given is unclear. to motivate Mr. Surasak to act in the wrong judgment Take sides or help the Samut Sakhon FC team win once morest the Rayong FC football club team, which is a violation of the law.
The actions of the 1st and 3rd defendants, who used the 2nd defendant to commit an offense, had to be punished as if the defendant was the same as the 2nd defendant who was used in the offense. by the three defendants confess and received bail
The court ordered probation officers to investigate the three defendants’ backgrounds, education, family backgrounds, and more. and send it to the court for consideration for a judgment
The court considered and saw that The three defendants actually committed the offense according to the lawsuit, convicting the 1st and 2nd defendants guilty under Section 66 of Section 66 of the 2013 Professional Sports Promotion Act.
As for the third defendant, guilty according to the Professional Sports Promotion Act 2013, section 66 in conjunction with the Criminal Code section 84, each of the three defendants is imprisoned for one year and fined 200,000 baht each.
The three defendants pleaded guilty. It is useful to consider there is a mitigating cause Reduce the sentence by half according to the Criminal Code, Section 78, the defendant will be imprisoned for 6 months each, fined 100,000 baht per person.
Considering the circumstances of the case, accompanying the investigation report and examining the three defendants, the general behavior and behavior of the three defendants did not appear to cause serious damage. When it did not appear that the three defendants had previously served prison sentences. saw it appropriate to give the three defendants an opportunity to turn into good citizens The imprisonment is to be suspended for a period of two years to supervise the three defendants. by having to report to the probation officer every 3 months every time within 1 year and to perform social service activities or public benefits as the probation officer deems appropriate for 24 hours According to the Criminal Code, Section 56, the fine is not paid to be dealt with according to the Penal Code Section 29, 30.
