2023-06-06 18:05:01
the senator ximena rincon referred to request -presented by 43 deputies – once morest the “alternative” project for isapres that he presented together with the other senators Matthias Walker, Javier Macaya, Francisco Chahuan y Rodrigo Galilee.
Let us remember that in the action, presented in the Constitutional Court, they accused that the initiative -approved in the Constitution Commission of the Senate- “grants a bailout and a pardon to the isapres”.
After that, Senator Rincón assured that here “You have to look for solutions, not create more problems” and that the deputies “go once morest of the President himself.
Adding that “we should see how we work to find a solution that allows us to give an answer and certainty to the public” because “If we don’t resolve the issue, it will cause millions of people to lose coverage”.
Rincón’s response to the request presented
In defense of the constitutional reform presented, the former DC assured that it was the way because “we cannot carry a law” so they used the tool of constitutional reform to be able to advance in this discussion.
Along these lines, he clarified that “not a pardon” and nowhere has “a transfer of money from the treasury to the isapres as established by the famous minute of the Secom and I would love for the minister to clarify it because “it is a falsehood”.
He also assured CNN Chile that the short law of isapres -presented by the Government- does not solve the problem either so it is necessary to “transparent the information” and “establish the need to legislate on this matter”.
“There are several projects that are there in parliament, which They have not been promoted by the Executive (…) we all have to be part of the solutions and not trip up,” he said.
adding that “If the Government, the President of the Republic wants to end the isapres, let him say so and make it transparent” and “here there must be a single universal insurance for everyone, regardless of who is the insurance administrator.”
“They insist on saying that the constitutional reform that we present is an alternative to the Government, false. We presented it almost a little before the Supreme Court ruling.”said.
Finally, he commented that the reform presented is not a bailout because “What the project seeks is to comply with the ruling and to do it properly”.
1686076384
#forgiving #include #transfer #money
