MEXICO CITY.- Following protests against judicial reform, Morena and its allies in the Senate They approved the use of a alternate location to discuss the controversial initiative of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
In addition, the plenary approved an agreement to discuss Judicial reform via “fast track”That is, when the minutes of the Chamber of Deputies are received, they will be immediately forwarded to the competent committees, which will expedite the issuance of opinions for approval.
Protests in the context of the discussion on judicial reform
Table of Contents
- 1 Protests in the context of the discussion on judicial reform
- 2 Senate approves alternate venue for judicial reform
- 3 Senate approves fast track for judicial reform
- 4 What are the main objections to President López Obrador’s judicial reform in Mexico?
- 5 What are the key reasons behind the widespread protests against Mexico’s judicial reform?
Table of Contents
This Tuesday they were registered protests and blockades of workers and students in the Chamber of Deputies, where the controversial judicial reform would be discussed.
For this reason, the deputies of Morena and allies decided to meet at the Magdalena Mixhuca Sports Complexwhich was immediately protected by a group of grenadiers and several capital patrols.
Senate approves alternate venue for judicial reform
Given this situation, Morena and its allies in the Senate They approved an agreement so that, in the event that circumstances of force majeure arise that make it impossible to hold a session, it is authorized that the Plenary sessions are held at alternate locationsinside or outside the premises of the Upper House.
The agreement, without mentioning it by name, was approved on the eve of receiving the minutes of judicial reform.
In response to this, the opposition stated that The government wants to approve “on the sly”under a huizache, with his back to the people,” the so-called plan of President López Obrador.
Senate approves fast track for judicial reform
In addition, at its first regular session, the President of the Board of Directors, Gerardo Fernandez Norona, He asked to read the agreement in which it was approved Fast-tracking judicial reform as soon as it is forwarded from the Chamber of Deputies.
It is noted that in exceptional cases they are received outside the session Senate plenary minutesThe presidency of the Board of Directors will immediately forward them to the competent committees and will report to the plenary session at the next session.
Once the commissions are received, they will be immediately dedicated to study, analysis, assessment and discussion and, where appropriate, the opinion can be issued with the speed that the matters warrant.
As soon as the commissions generate the corresponding opinions, will be published immediately in the Senate Gazette and will be submitted to the legislative plenary for consideration.
#Senate #approves #alternate #venue #fast #track #judicial #reform
2024-09-11 09:04:24
What are the main objections to President López Obrador’s judicial reform in Mexico?
Mexico’s Judicial Reform: Protests, Alternate Venues, and Fast Tracking
In recent days, Mexico has been witnessing intense protests and controversies surrounding President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s judicial reform initiative. The reform, which has been met with resistance from various quarters, aims to overhaul the country’s judiciary system. This article provides an overview of the latest developments in this ongoing saga.
Protests and Blockades
On Tuesday, protests and blockades were reported at the Chamber of Deputies, where the judicial reform was scheduled to be discussed. The protests, led by workers and students, forced the deputies of Morena and its allies to shift the meeting to an alternate venue – the Magdalena Mixhuca Sports Complex. The complex was promptly protected by a group of grenadiers and several capital patrols.
Senate Approves Alternate Venue
In light of the protests, the Senate approved an agreement to hold plenary sessions at alternate locations, either inside or outside the premises of the Upper House, in the event of circumstances of force majeure. The agreement, which did not explicitly mention the judicial reform, was approved on the eve of receiving the reform’s minutes.
Fast Tracking Judicial Reform
In its first regular session, the Senate also approved a fast-tracking process for the judicial reform. According to the agreement, once the minutes of the Chamber of Deputies are received, they will be immediately forwarded to the competent committees, which will expedite the issuance of opinions for approval.
Government’s Response to Criticism
The opposition has accused the government of attempting to approve the reform “on the sly,” without transparently consulting the people. However, the government has maintained that the reform is necessary to overhaul the country’s judiciary system.
President López Obrador’s Role
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, also known as AMLO, has been a key figure in the judicial reform initiative. As the 65th and current President of Mexico, he has been pushing for the reform as part of his broader agenda to transform the country’s political and economic landscape [[2]].
Concerns over Democracy
The judicial reform has sparked concerns among many about the potential erosion of democracy in Mexico. According to a recent opinion piece in the Washington Post, the reform could “wreck the country’s fragile democracy” [[1]]. Others have expressed concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of the executive branch.
Conclusion
Mexico’s judicial reform saga continues to unfold, with protests, alternate venues, and fast-tracking processes dominating the headlines. As the country grapples with the implications of this reform, one thing is clear – the stakes are high, and the outcome will have far-reaching consequences for Mexico’s democracy and judiciary system.
References:
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9sManuelL%C3%B3pez_Obrador”>[2]
What are the key reasons behind the widespread protests against Mexico’s judicial reform?
Mexico’s Judicial Reform: A Controversial Move Amidst Protests and Criticism
Protests in the Context of the Discussion on Judicial Reform
Mexico City has witnessed protests and blockades by workers and students in the Chamber of Deputies, where the controversial judicial reform is set to be discussed [[1]]. The protests have led to the approval of an alternate location for the discussion of the judicial reform, with the Magdalena Mixhuca Sports Complex being chosen as the new venue [[1]]. The complex was immediately protected by a group of grenadiers and several capital patrols.
Senate Approves Alternate Venue for Judicial Reform
In light of the protests, Morena and its allies in the Senate approved an agreement to hold plenary sessions at alternate locations, either inside or outside the premises of the Upper House, in the event that circumstances of force majeure arise making it impossible to hold a session [[1]]. The agreement was approved without mentioning the judicial reform by name, on the eve of receiving the minutes of the reform.
Senate Approves Fast Track for Judicial Reform
In addition, the Senate approved a fast track for the judicial reform, which means that when the minutes of the reform are received from the Chamber of Deputies, they will be immediately forwarded to the competent committees, which will expedite the issuance of opinions for approval [[1]]. This move has been criticized by the opposition, who claim that the government wants to approve the reform “on the sly” without proper discussion and transparency.
What are the Main Objections to President López Obrador’s Judicial Reform in Mexico?
The judicial reform proposed by President López Obrador has been met with criticism and opposition from various quarters. One of the main objections is that the reform would allow judges to be elected by popular vote, which could lead to political interference in the judiciary [[2]]. Others have expressed concerns that the reform would undermine the independence of the judiciary and threaten the country’s democracy[[[3]].
La Reforma: A Historical Precursor to Mexico’s Judicial Reform
It is worth noting that Mexico has a history of liberal political and social revolutions, including La Reforma, a movement that took place between 1854 and 1876 under the leadership of Benito Juárez [[2]]. This movement aimed to limit the power of the Catholic Church and promote liberal reforms in Mexico. While the current judicial reform is distinct from La Reforma, it is part of a broader historical context of efforts to promote liberal values and limit the power of institutions in Mexico.
the controversy surrounding Mexico’s judicial reform is a complex issue with far-reaching implications for the country’s democracy and judiciary. As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the historical context and the potential consequences of the reform on Mexico’s institutions and citizens.
References:
[[1]]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4y9q74j2ko
[[2]]https://www.britannica.com/event/La-Reforma
[[[3]]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/09/10/mexico-judiciary-reform-democracy-amlo/