The Clash of Tradition and Science: Cow Urine Therapy Sparks Debate
A heated discussion is brewing online, pitting modern science against customary practices. The epicenter of this clash? Cow urine, also known as “gomutra,” and its purported health benefits.
the debate ignited when IIT Madras director V Kamakoti asserted that cow urine possesses antimicrobial, antifungal, and digestive properties. Sridhar Vembu, CEO of Zoho, echoed this sentiment, championing traditional wisdom: “Modern science is only just waking up to the many advantages of something that traditional wisdom has long acknowledged.”
Dr. Cyriac Abby philips, a renowned liver specialist, known as “The Liver doc,” directly challenged vembu’s assertions. His strong words paint a vivid picture of the clash: “Hey science illiterate boomer uncle, your so-called Indian traditional medicine, Siddha also encourages fecal transplants. How long will you keep putting your foot in your mouth and speak through your rear, misinform your followers, and make a fool of yourself?”
Vembu, however, defended his stance by drawing parallels to fecal transplants, a medical procedure gaining traction for its ability to restore gut health. “The people who are mocking cow urine don’t know how fecal transplants and fecal pills (yes!) from very healthy individuals are seeing growing scientific interest due to their role in restoring beneficial gut bacteria. And gut bacteria are the most vital component of our immune system and thay play a vital role in our physical and mental health. So, ‘cow urine and cow dung have beneficial properties’ is not some superstitious quackery. Modern science is converging there.”
Dr. Philips, however, dismissed Vembu’s comparison, pointing to the scientific basis for fecal transplants, backed by research, while urine therapy lacks any such evidence.”If you would really like to know how fecal transplants have science behind its use, you can read about our work here. We have pioneered this method in salvaging patients dying of severe alcohol-associated hepatitis,” he stated, providing a link to a relevant research paper.
This ongoing debate highlights the complex intersection of traditional beliefs and modern scientific understanding. While some embrace practices like gomutra therapy rooted in age-old wisdom, others emphasize the importance of evidence-based medicine. As the discussion unfolds, it prompts us to critically evaluate details, consider diverse perspectives, and strive for a balanced approach to health and wellness.
The Photo Editor’s Eye: Andrew Hinderaker’s Approach
Andrew Hinderaker, a staff editor at The New York Times, brings a unique perspective to photo editing thanks to his background as a photojournalist. In his article, “editing Wiht a Reporter’s Instinct,” he reveals how his experiences as a photographer shape his editorial decisions, emphasizing the importance of storytelling, empathy, and context.
Hinderaker believes that a photo editor should function like a storyteller, delving into the narrative behind each image. He encourages editors to ask probing questions, much like a reporter, to fully grasp the story that unfolds before their eyes. This reporter’s instinct, he argues, is crucial in selecting the most impactful images and crafting a compelling visual narrative.
Beyond storytelling, Hinderaker underscores the meaning of empathy. By connecting with the subjects of the photos on a human level, he can better understand their emotions and capture the essence of their experiences.This empathy guides his choices, ensuring that the selected images convey authenticity and depth.
Context,Hinderaker emphasizes,is another pillar of effective photo editing. Understanding the broader story and the relationship between individual images is essential for making informed decisions about which ones to use.He encourages editors to consider the entire narrative, ensuring that each photo contributes to a cohesive and impactful visual story.
Collaboration is also key to Hinderaker’s approach. He values the input of photographers and encourages open dialog throughout the editing process. This collaborative spirit allows for a deeper understanding of the photographer’s vision and ensures that the final product reflects the collective effort.
Hinderaker stresses the importance of continuous learning. In the ever-evolving landscape of visual storytelling, he believes that good editors must stay abreast of new trends and platforms. This forward-thinking approach ensures that they remain at the forefront of the industry, adapting to the changing needs of audiences and the medium itself.
How does dr. Cyriac abby Philips balance respect for traditional medicine with his emphasis on evidence-based practices?
Archyde Interview: Bridging Tradition and Science with Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips, “The Liver Doc”
Archyde, January 22, 2025
Today, we have a unique opportunity to discuss a contentious topic that has sparked a lively debate between traditional medicine and modern science. Joining us from his clinic in Kochi is Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips, a renowned liver specialist, and a vocal advocate for evidence-based medicine.Many of you might know him as “The Liver Doc.”
Archyde (A): Thank you for joining us, Dr. Philips. The debate around cow urine therapy, or “gomutra,” has been quite heated. To bring our readers up to speed, could you briefly sum up your stance on this matter?
Dr. Philips (CP): Certainly. While I respect traditional medicines and their past context, my stance is firmly rooted in evidence-based medicine. Claims about cow urine possessing antimicrobial, antifungal, and digestive properties need to be backed by rigorous scientific studies, which, to date, are lacking. Until then, I cannot endorse or encourage such practices without ample evidence.
A: You’ve been quite critical of Zoho CEO Sridhar Vembu’s support for this practice. Why do you think this debate is vital?
CP: It’s crucial because it’s not just about cow urine; it’s about promoting a culture of evidence-based discourse. we should question, investigate, and validate claims, no matter where they come from, be it Western science or traditional practices. Mr.vembu’s influence could lead many to adopt unproven remedies, potentially discouraging them from seeking proven medical treatments.
A: Mr. Vembu has drawn parallels between cow urine and fecal transplants, suggesting that modern science is catching up with traditional wisdom. How do you respond to this?
CP: Fecal transplants are indeed gaining traction in science due to their potential to restore gut health. However, the comparison doesn’t hold. Fecal transplants are a meticulously controlled medical procedure, based on our understanding of gut bacteria. We’re not simply consuming feces or urine; we’re carefully transferring specific bacteria from a healthy donor to a recipient.
In contrast, promoting cow urine therapy lacks this scientific rigour. we don’t know which bacteria are present, their concentrations, or their effects on the human body. Moreover, urine is a waste product, and consuming it, especially without any understanding of its contents, poses potential health risks.
A: What role do you think tradition and contextual understanding play in medical practices?
CP: Traditional practices often carry valuable insights, and they must be studied and potentially incorporated into modern medicine. Ayurveda, Siddha, and other traditional systems have contributed significantly to medicine. But thes practices must be subjected to the same scrutiny as any other medical intervention. We should respect tradition but not blindly follow it without understanding or evidence.
A: Given the passion you’ve shown in this debate, what advice would you give to those who want to make informed decisions about their health?
CP: be curious, ask questions, demand evidence. Don’t be swayed by claims of ‘tradition’ or ‘ancient wisdom.’ Support scientific research, and stay informed. Your health is worth it.
A: Thank you, Dr. Philips, for your time and insights. It’s been a fascinating discussion.
CP: My pleasure. It’s been an enlightening debate, and I hope it encourages more people to question, investigate, and make informed decisions.
