Delhi‘s Air Quality Shows Slight Improvement, But Court Remains Unsatisfied
Delhi’s air quality showed a slight improvement for the second consecutive day, but the Supreme Court wasn’t impressed.
The city’s Air Quality Index (AQI) moved to the ‘poor’ category from ‘very poor’. The morning AQI stood at 273,改进 compared to a 24-hour average of 285 on Sunday, according to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
Despite the improvement, the Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Delhi government’s implementation of emergency measures, known as GRAP-IV.
The apex court has extended the restrictions until a ‘downward trend’ in Pollution levels is observed
The Lifecycle of a sectarian Data structure of Word is not set!
компонентов:, which was the,
while
INR 2000,Download Grades episódios,
to jes qualifying to
and other. Delhi’s break Premierify. **question
**The court also sought information on the compensation dis
to
construction workers
, which the Delhi government had failed to provide.
The Supreme Court on Monday delayed easing of GRAP-4 restrictions in Delhi-NCR until a ‘downward trend’ in air quality is observed. Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih expressed dissatisfaction with the implementation of the measures, which aim to tackle Delhi’s worsening air pollution. The next hearing is scheduled for December 5th.
Criticism Of Implementation
WTO
Expressing dissatisfaction, the bench, comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih, remarked "There is hardly any implementation of stage 4 of GRAP to deal with air pollution in the national capital." The court criticized the number of officers deployed by the Delhi government to enforce these measures.
Coordination Concerns
Highlighting a "complete lack of coordination" among the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Police, Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), and other entities, the court held.
to
the
**next
Delhi: **The court on Monday declined to ease GRAP-4. What A showroom is not set.
The bench will meet again on December 5 to review the state’s efforts to implement expenditures. The Supreme Court had directed state governments to Implement the measures.
*The court directed the chief secretaries of Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan to appearing virtually on December 5th to answer for the non-compliance with its order regarding
As per a Delhi High Court order.
, not set to
to
The Commission for Air It
is responsible for
The Supreme court has al
The Delhi
to
AQI is Respected.
Improvements Still lagging
The court will meet
to implement
a
for
Following the meeting.
to
**.
This
the
How can the Delhi government improve the implementation of GRAP-IV measures?
## Delhi Air Quality Improves but Court Demands More
**Interviewer:** Welcome back to the show. Joining us today to discuss the latest developments in Delhi’s ongoing air quality crisis is Dr. [Guest Name], an expert on environmental policy. Dr. [Guest Name], thanks for being here.
**Dr. [Guest Name]:** Thanks for having me.
**Interviewer:** Delhi’s air quality has shown a slight improvement over the last two days, moving from the ‘very poor’ to ‘poor’ category. While this is positive news, the Supreme Court remains dissatisfied with the Delhi government’s response. What are your thoughts on this?
**Dr. [Guest Name]:** It’s a mixed bag. Any improvement in air quality is welcome, but the fact that the Supreme Court is extending restrictions under GRAP-IV shows that the situation is still critical. The court’s dissatisfaction highlights the need for more aggressive and effective implementation of pollution control measures.
**Interviewer:** What specifically is the court unhappy about regarding the government’s actions?
**Dr. [Guest Name]:** The court seems particularly concerned about two things: the inadequacy of the GRAP-IV implementation and the lack of compensation for construction workers who are disproportionately affected by these restrictions.
**Interviewer:** Could you elaborate on the GRAP-IV implementation?
**Dr. [Guest Name]:** GRAP-IV are a set of emergency measures that kick in when air pollution reaches severe levels. While these measures exist, their effectiveness hinges on strict enforcement and swift action. The court seems to be suggesting that the government isn’t doing enough in these areas. [[1](https://aqicn.org/forecast/delhi/)]
**Interviewer:** And what about the compensation for construction workers?
**Dr. [Guest Name]:** Construction work often contributes to air pollution, and workers themselves are vulnerable to its harmful effects. The court is demanding that the government provide compensation to these workers during periods of high pollution when restrictions are in place. This is a matter of social justice and ensuring that vulnerable populations are not disproportionately burdened by the crisis.
**Interviewer:** What are your expectations for the coming days and weeks?
**Dr. [Guest Name]:**
I think we can expect continued pressure from the Supreme Court for stronger action from the Delhi government. The key will be to see if the government responds effectively to these demands and implements more robust measures to curb pollution. It’s a critical juncture for Delhi, and the decisions made in the coming days will have a significant impact on the city’s air quality and the well-being of its residents.
**Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest Name], thank you for sharing your insights. We will continue to follow this developing story.
