Save ‘Around the Horn’: Fans Petition ESPN to Rethink Cancellation Decision

‘Around the Horn’ Faces Final Countdown: Can Fans Save the ESPN Classic?

March 22, 2025

For over two decades, ESPN’s Around the Horn (ATH) has been a weekday staple, delivering lively sports debates and witty banter. But as the clock ticks towards May 23, the show is slated to air its final episode, bringing an end to its impressive 23-year run of nearly 5,000 episodes. The cancellation has sparked a wave of nostalgia and debate among fans, panelists, and industry experts alike.

A Fan-Led Campaign Emerges

In a last-ditch effort to save the show, a dedicated group of fans has launched a petition on Change.org titled,“Prevent the Cancellation of ESPN’s ‘Around the Horn’ Show.” The petition, spearheaded by Juliana Buendia, expresses the fans’ disappointment: As massive supporters and long-term viewers of ESPN’s Around the Horn show, we are devastated to hear about the proposed cancellation of the program. The petition further emphasizes ATH’s strong viewership numbers, citing ESPN’s own public relations releases that claim, Nielson ratings show that it consistently ranks among the most-watched, non-live telecast events on ESPN.

But, as of today The petition has only amassed 271 signatures. Given past campaigns that have saved shows, that number falls short.

speculation and Shifting Priorities

The looming cancellation has fueled speculation about the reasons behind ESPN’s decision. Theories range from a shift in programming strategy to changing viewer preferences. Bryan Curtis of The Ringer suggested that ESPN simply did not have room for this type of show anymore, as the network increasingly focuses on high-profile personalities like stephen A. Smith and Pat McAfee. This strategic pivot towards individual “mega-stars” might leave less room for ensemble debate formats like ATH.

However, other theories have surfaced. Former panelist Jay Mariotti controversially claimed the show failed because it went “woke,” a statement that drew sharp criticism, including a retort from Jemele Hill, who dismissed it as a dumb statement.” This highlights the contentious debate surrounding the role of social and political commentary in sports broadcasting.

The Legacy of ‘Around the Horn’

ATH’s impact on sports media is undeniable. the show provided a platform for diverse voices and opinions, fostering engaging and often humorous debates. The show’s unique format, with its points-based system and witty host commentary, set it apart from traditional sports talk shows.

The show has also been a launching pad for numerous careers in sports media. Many of its panelists have gone on to achieve success in other areas of broadcasting and journalism solidifying ATH‘s place in sports media history.

Tony Reali, the show’s host, has become synonymous with Around the Horn, his fast wit and ability to moderate heated debates have earned him widespread acclaim.Tributes have already poured in, honoring the show’s legacy and impact on the sports media landscape.

Can Fan Power Prevail? Lessons from TV History

While the odds may seem stacked against them, history offers glimmers of hope for around the Horn fans. Several successful fan campaigns have saved shows from cancellation:

• Star Trek: Fan letters and organized campaigns in the late 1960s convinced NBC to renew the show for a third season, laying the foundation for its enduring legacy.
• arrested Development: After its initial cancellation by Fox, passionate fan support led to a revival on Netflix, demonstrating the power of online communities.
• Friday Night Lights: A dedicated fanbase and critical acclaim helped the show survive despite low ratings, ultimately securing additional seasons.
• Futurama: Multiple cancellations and revivals demonstrate the show’s resilient fanbase,which successfully campaigned for its return on several occasions.
• Jericho: Fans mailed peanuts to CBS executives to protest the show’s cancellation, leading to a brief renewal for a second season.

The Future of sports Debate

The potential end of Around the Horn raises questions about the future of sports debate on television. In an era dominated by hot takes and sensationalism, can a show that values reasoned arguments and witty banter survive? As ESPN prioritizes individual personalities and studio shows, the future of panel-based debate programs remains uncertain.

Potential Counterarguments and Considerations

While the fan petition demonstrates the show’s dedicated following, some argue that Around the Horn has simply run its course. Critics point to declining ratings and a perceived shift in viewer preferences towards more sensationalized and personality-driven content.

Furthermore, ESPN’s financial considerations cannot be ignored.As media companies grapple with cord-cutting and declining revenues, difficult decisions must be made about programming investments.

Conclusion: A Final Plea

As May 23 approaches, the fate of Around the Horn hangs in the balance. While the fan petition faces an uphill battle, the show’s legacy and impact on sports media remain undeniable. Whether or not ESPN reverses its decision, ATH will be remembered as a pioneer in sports debate programming, a platform for diverse voices, and a source of entertainment for millions of viewers. Only time will tell if fan power can once again triumph and save a beloved television show from cancellation.

)

‘Around the Horn’ Cancellation: A Conversation with Former ESPN Executive, Jessica Miller

Archyde News: welcome, Jessica. thanks for joining us today to discuss the potential cancellation of ESPN’s “Around the Horn.” As a former executive, you had firsthand experience with the show’s success and the broader ESPN landscape. What are your initial thoughts on the network’s decision?

Jessica Miller: Thank you for having me. It’s certainly bittersweet. “Around the Horn” was a unique and compelling show. I think many of us, including myself, are saddened by its scheduled ending on may 23rd.It provided a different kind of sports entertainment than what we see more of now.

Archyde News: There’s a lot of speculation about the reasons behind the cancellation, including a shift towards shows led by individual personalities. Do you think that’s a primary factor?

Jessica Miller: It’s likely a combination of factors, but yes, I believe the move towards personality-driven content is a key driver. Networks are focused on building stars, and shows like “Around the Horn,” with ensemble casts, don’t always fit that model as easily. This is especially true in an era of tight budgets and the need to maximize viewer engagement.

Archyde News: We’ve seen a fan petition launched to try and save the show. How effective can these types of campaigns be in the current media landscape?

Jessica Miller: Fan campaigns have had success in the past, but it’s an uphill battle.The network has already made a strategic decision, the economics of the situation need to be right. The petition demonstrates the show’s dedicated audience, but that support really needs to translate to sustained viewership and revenue.

Archyde News: You mentioned the legacy of “Around the Horn.” Beyond the entertainment value, how did this show impact the landscape of sports media?

Jessica Miller: “Around the Horn” created a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and really set the template for smart, fast-paced debate. It provided opportunities for up-and-coming commentators, and many of its panelists have had very triumphant careers.It showed that sports discussion could be smart and genuinely entertaining.

Archyde News: Former panelist Jay Mariotti stated the show failed for going “woke”. Others have disagreed. Can you comment?

Jessica miller: It’s clear to me that his comment caused division. Shows wich succeed, do so because they are engaging with their target audience. “Around the Horn” enjoyed viewership, so I don’t believe that statement is valid.

Archyde News: Looking ahead, what do you believe the future of sports debate programming looks like, and what lessons can be learned from “Around the Horn”?

Jessica miller: the future is likely a mix. We’ll continue to see stars at the forefront, but hopefully there will be a renewed recognition of the value of well-structured ensemble debate shows. “Around the Horn” proved there’s an audience for intelligent discussions. The lesson is that audiences enjoy real engagement, and the exchange of different viewpoints.

Archyde News: Do you believe the show will be missed if it is cancelled? And as the sport’s debate landscape continues to evolve, what do you believe it truly needs to succeed?

Jessica Miller: absolutely, it will be missed. It’s a unique format in today’s sports debate world. For future success, programs need to find authentic voices, build real connections with viewers, and prioritize insightful discussion over empty controversy. That’s what made ATH great.

Journalist: Jessica, this was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.