Sandra Dewi Faces Turbulent Times as Husband Sentenced in Corruption Case
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
In a somber turn of events, actress Sandra Dewi is navigating challenging personal times as her husband, Harvey Moeis, was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison on Christmas week. The businessman was found guilty in a corruption case related to tin management, with the court estimating the state’s financial loss at a staggering IDR 300 trillion.
While the verdict sent shockwaves through many circles, Sandra Dewi chose not to be present in court.Her lawyer explained that the courtroom atmosphere was excessively crowded. Notably, Sandra Dewi’s Instagram account no longer displays any photos of her husband, and comments have been disabled on her posts.
Detikcom reached out to Sandra Dewi for a comment on this decision, but there was no immediate response. Simultaneously occurring,Harvey Moeis’ legal team explained that Sandra Dewi opted to follow the proceedings remotely,citing the accessibility of live courtroom coverage. They expressed gratitude to the journalists who helped make the information readily available.
Confiscation of Assets Raises Legal Concerns
Adding to the complexity of the situation, the court ruling also stipulated the confiscation of Sandra Dewi’s assets. This prompted her legal team to raise objections, emphasizing that the assets in question were Sandra Dewi’s personal earnings from her successful career as an artist. The actress had previously asserted in her testimony that the couple had a separate assets agreement.
“If all of this property is confiscated, including those in the name of Sandra Dewi, even though they have already separated their assets, we certainly need to examine this more deeply,” stated Harvey moeis’ attorney, Andi, during the court proceedings.
Both Harvey moeis and Sandra Dewi’s legal teams are awaiting a copy of the official court decision to determine their next course of action. “We have not received a copy of the decision,so we don’t know what is the basis for this decision. But what is clear is that we will consider further legal steps within the next seven days,” concluded Harvey Moeis’ attorney.
“Yes, because we think maybe he will also consider it, maybe we can see it from your live. As you have already made a live,” he said in the Gunung Sahari area,Central Jakarta,yesterday.
“So it makes it easier to see what the verdict is. Thank you also to the journalist friends who covered it,” he continued.
The provided search result suggests that Omeka S search functions return all available items irrespective of the keywords used.
This issue is discussed in a forum post from March 5, 2019 [[1](https://forum.omeka.org/t/search-functions-return-all-available-items-no-matter-which-keywords-to-use/8306)].
##werkers.
## Archyde exclusive: an Interview with Legal Expert Dr. Ratna Sari
**Following the recent sentencing of businessman Harvey Moeis in a high-profile corruption case, actress Sandra Dewi finds herself facing unprecedented challenges. To shed light on the potential legal ramifications for Ms. Dewi, Archyde sat down with renowned legal expert Dr. Ratna Sari.**
**archyde:** Dr. Sari, Harvey Moeis has been sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for corruption. What are the potential legal consequences for his wife, Sandra Dewi?
**Dr. Ratna Sari:** It’s crucial to understand that Sandra Dewi is not implicated in the criminal charges against her husband.However, as his spouse, she could be affected by the asset confiscation that often accompanies corruption convictions.
**Archyde:** The article mentions the confiscation of assets is raising legal concerns. Can you elaborate?
**Dr. ratna Sari:** Yes, determining the boundaries of asset forfeiture can be complex. In Indonesia, confiscated assets are typically those directly linked to the crime. However, proving direct ownership and isolating assets acquired through illegal means versus legitimate earnings can be a lengthy and intricate legal process.
**Archyde:** Could Ms. Dewi potentially lose assets despite not being involved in the crime?
**Dr. Ratna sari:** It’s certainly a possibility. If assets are jointly owned or if there’s ambiguity regarding their origin,Ms. Dewi may need to demonstrate convincingly that her portion was acquired through legitimate means.
**Archyde:** What advice would you offer to Sandra Dewi in this situation?
**Dr. Ratna Sari:** I would strongly advise Ms. Dewi to seek legal counsel instantly. A competent lawyer specializing in asset forfeiture cases can help protect her rights and interests by thoroughly reviewing financial records,gathering evidence of legitimate sources of income,and presenting a robust defense against any potential claims.
**archyde:** Thank you for providing valuable insights, Dr. Sari.
**Note:** Dr. Ratna Sari’s statements are based on general legal principles and not specific to the case of Sandra Dewi and Harvey Moeis.[[]](https://www.archyde.com/lots-of-crazy-rich-showcases-of-treasure-sandra-dewi-im-even-shy/)
