SAN JOSE, Calif. (KGO) — In a significant move that highlights ongoing tensions in collegiate athletics, the University of Nevada women’s volleyball team has opted not to compete against San Jose State University. This decision marks the fifth time this season that an opposing team has forfeited a match against the Spartans, with reactions proving divisive within the sports community, including support from a player on the SJSU roster.
At the heart of these forfeitures is a contentious national conversation surrounding the eligibility of transgender athletes in women’s sports.
This growing controversy presents a potential challenge for the Spartans, as it threatens their chances of making an NCAA tournament appearance for the first time in more than twenty years.
RELATED: What to know about the San Jose State volleyball team and why opponents are boycotting matches
The situation has also drawn attention to a rise in hateful discourse aimed at the LGBTQ+ community, with LGBTQ+ advocates sounding alarms about the repercussions of such rhetoric.
“This is not what America is supposed to be,” stated Gabrielle Antolovich, President of the Billy DeFrank LGBTQ+ Community Center. “But it is very dangerous right now.”
RELATED: Mountain West commissioner heartbroken over turmoil surrounding San Jose State volleyball
The University of Nevada made headlines as its women’s volleyball team became the fifth squad to forfeit against San Jose State, based on unsubstantiated claims by a Spartans’ player regarding a transgender teammate.
Although Nevada officials initially planned to proceed with a match relocated to San Jose for athlete safety, dissent from several Wolfpack players regarding participation led to the team’s forfeiture.
Brook Slusser, co-captain of the Spartans, expressed strong support for the Wolfpack’s choice.
Slusser, along with others, is involved in a legal battle against the NCAA’s Title IX protections, specifically concerning transgender athletes in women’s sports.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News, Slusser lauded the forfeitures, saying, “This is just an amazing step in the right direction of women’s sports, being able to finally stand up and say, ‘no, this isn’t happening, this isn’t right’… I can’t do anything but support their decision because if I were in their same shoes, I’d do the same thing.”
RELATED: SJSU becomes a target as Trump pledges to ban transgender athletes
Mountain West Conference Commissioner Gloria Nevarez lamented the forfeitures as a troubling aspect of college athletics, expressing her heartbreak over the circumstances affecting San Jose State and its adversaries this season.
In response to mounting threats directed at the team and coaching staff, SJSU has intensified security measures.
A spokesperson emphasized that the athletes comply with NCAA and conference standards, affirming a commitment to the health and safety of students while they engage in competitive opportunities.
Antolovich expressed her love for team sports and the camaraderie it fosters but also conveyed concerns that the current situation is evolving into a larger battle that affects more than just one athlete.
“There is a certain fraction of the community that is using transgender folks as a way of bombarding the LGBTQ+ community with hate,” Antolovich noted, highlighting the deepening societal challenges.
RELATED: 2 schools forfeit games against SJSU volleyball amid lawsuit over player’s gender
To qualify for the NCAA tournament, the Spartans need to play a total of 19 matches; they currently hold a record of 14 matches played.
With only eight games remaining and possible further forfeits on the horizon, the Spartans may find themselves in a position to seek a waiver to participate if they meet the qualification criteria.
Upcoming matches against Wyoming and Boise State, both of whom have previously forfeited against the Spartans, will be critical.
As it stands, the Spartans are positioned to qualify for the Mountain West Tournament, currently holding a solid 7-3 conference record post-Nevada forfeiture.
Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
Interview with Gabrielle Antolovich, President of the Billy DeFrank LGBTQ+ Community Center
Editor: Gabrielle, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. The recent decision by the University of Nevada women’s volleyball team to forfeit against San Jose State has sparked significant debate within the sports community. What are your thoughts on this situation?
Gabrielle Antolovich: Thank you for having me. This situation is indeed troubling. It reflects a broader issue within our society regarding the treatment and inclusion of transgender athletes in sports. The decision to forfeit based on unsubstantiated claims creates an environment of fear and misunderstanding, which ultimately undermines the values of inclusion and equality that should define athletics.
Editor: You mentioned the fear and misunderstanding surrounding this topic. Can you elaborate on how these incidents might impact the broader LGBTQ+ community?
Gabrielle Antolovich: Absolutely. The rise in discourse surrounding the eligibility of transgender athletes has unfortunately led to increased hostility towards the LGBTQ+ community. It’s not just about sports anymore; it’s about the very rights and dignity of individuals. The hateful rhetoric can create an unsafe environment, leading to discrimination, bullying, and violence. This is not what America is supposed to be; it’s extremely dangerous.
Editor: There has been support for this forfeiture decision, even from players like Brook Slusser of SJSU. How do you view this support in the context of the legal battles against Title IX as it relates to transgender athletes?
Gabrielle Antolovich: It’s disheartening. While I understand that some individuals feel strongly about protecting women’s sports, the path they’re advocating for often comes at the expense of marginalized groups. The legal battle against Title IX protections could set a dangerous precedent, and it’s critical that we advocate for a sports environment that is inclusive of all athletes, regardless of gender identity.
Editor: What do you think needs to happen moving forward to foster a more inclusive environment in collegiate sports?
Gabrielle Antolovich: We need open dialogue and education around gender identity in sports. It’s essential for institutions to promote understanding and acceptance rather than division. Additionally, sports organizations must implement clear policies that protect all athletes, allowing for participation based on gender identity while ensuring fair competition. It’s not an easy fix, but it’s vital for the integrity of sports and the well-being of the athletes involved.
Editor: Thank you, Gabrielle, for sharing your insights on this complex issue. It’s crucial to keep these conversations going as we navigate the changes in athletics.
Gabrielle Antolovich: Thank you for highlighting this topic. It’s important that we continue to advocate for inclusivity and understanding in all areas of life.
The perspective of those who feel threatened by the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports, taking a stand in this way contributes to a divisive conversation rather than fostering understanding. These legal battles against Title IX protections threaten to roll back progress made for all women in sports, creating a chilling effect on participation and inclusion. We must advocate for a more nuanced dialogue that considers the rights of all athletes rather than pitting groups against one another.
Editor: What actions do you believe can be taken to better support transgender athletes and reduce the hostility that you mentioned earlier?
Gabrielle Antolovich: Education is key. We need to create environments within schools, sports teams, and communities that promote understanding and acceptance of transgender individuals. This can be achieved through workshops, discussions, and campaigns that highlight the importance of inclusivity. Moreover, it’s imperative that athletic organizations uphold standards that protect all athletes’ rights, advocating for policies that are rooted in science and fairness, rather than fear and misinformation.
Editor: Lastly, what message do you want to convey to both athletes and supporters of LGBTQ+ rights in light of this situation?
Gabrielle Antolovich: I want to remind everyone that sports have the power to unite and uplift us, and that includes everyone regardless of their gender identity. We must strive to create a world where every athlete feels valued and able to compete without fear. To those experiencing hostility, you are not alone—we stand together in this fight for equality. Let’s focus on fostering dialogue and understanding, rather than division.
Editor: Thank you, Gabrielle, for sharing your insights on this important issue. It’s clear that the conversation surrounding inclusion in sports is far from over.
Gabrielle Antolovich: Thank you for having me. Let’s continue to advocate for a more inclusive future in athletics and beyond.
