A Ukrainian soldier works on an attack drone in the village of Chasiv Yar, Donetsk region, Ukraine. The army modifies its devices so that they can be loaded with explosives weighing up to two kilograms so that they can be launched remotely at advancing Russian troops.
Photo: EFE – MARIA SENOVILLA
As US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer meet in Washington on Friday to discuss whether to allow Ukraine to fire long-range missiles provided by its allies at Russia, Moscow’s UN ambassador echoed a message already heard from President Vladimir Putin: “This would significantly change the very nature of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the United States and European countries are at war with Russia.”
Speaking before the UN Security Council, Vassily Nebenzia said that if Western states allow kyiv to carry out such attacks, then NATO countries would be “waging a direct war” against their country. He told the 15 members of the body: “The fact is that NATO will be a direct party to hostilities against a nuclear power. I think we should not forget about this and think about the consequences.”
The day before learning of this intervention, Putin had already warned that a decision of such magnitude would lead to a dramatic escalation of the war, which in 2022 took the form of a full-scale invasion, with about 18% of Ukrainian territory remaining occupied by Russian forces. “Russia will make appropriate decisions based on the threats we will face,” Putin told a state television reporter.
Meanwhile, his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, who recently held a meeting with former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who said that “it is vital that Ukraine can defend itself properly” and that “it is clear that they should be able to use the Storm Shadow, Scalp and ATACMS systems as quickly as possible against targets in Russia,” announced that he will meet with Biden this month to present him with a “victory plan, a set of interconnected solutions that will give Ukraine enough power and elements to steer this war towards peace.”
📧 📬 🌍 Week by week we will have a summary of the news that will make us feel that It’s not the end of the worldIf you want to sign up and receive our newsletter every Monday newsletteryou can do it in the following link.
👀🌎📄 Have you heard the latest news from around the world yet? We invite you to watch them in El Espectador.
If you are interested in any international topic, want to send us an opinion on our content or receive more information, write to us at [email protected] o [email protected]
What are the potential consequences of providing Ukraine with long-range missiles in the ongoing conflict with Russia?
Table of Contents
Title: Ukraine-Russia Conflict: The Debate Over Long-Range Missiles and the Risk of Escalation
Meta Description: As the Ukraine-Russia conflict continues, the debate over providing Ukraine with long-range missiles intensifies. What are the implications of such a move, and how will it affect the conflict and global security?
Keywords: Ukraine-Russia conflict, long-range missiles, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Joe Biden, Keir Starmer, Volodymyr Zelensky, Vladimir Putin, war escalation, global security.
As the conflict between Ukraine and Russia rages on, a new development has sparked heated debate: the possibility of Ukraine being provided with long-range missiles by its Western allies. The move is being discussed by US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, among others, as a way to help Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression. However, Russia has warned that such a move would significantly escalate the conflict, leading to a dramatic shift in the nature of the war.
The Russian Warning
Moscow’s UN ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, has echoed the sentiments of President Vladimir Putin, stating that if Western states allow Ukraine to fire long-range missiles at Russia, it would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are at war with Russia. Nebenzia warned that such a move would make NATO countries a direct party to hostilities against a nuclear power, with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Putin’s Ultimatum
Putin himself has warned that a decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles would lead to a dramatic escalation of the war. In a statement to a state television reporter, Putin said, “Russia will make appropriate decisions based on the threats we will face.” The Russian president’s words have been seen as a veiled threat, implying that Russia would take drastic action if Ukraine is allowed to attack Russian territory with long-range missiles.
Ukraine’s Plea
Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been urging Western leaders to provide Ukraine with the necessary weapons to defend itself against Russian aggression. Zelensky has announced that he will meet with Biden this month to present him with a ”victory plan, a set of interconnected solutions that will give Ukraine enough power and elements to steer this war towards peace.” The Ukrainian president’s plea has been backed by former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has called for Ukraine to be provided with long-range missiles, including the Storm Shadow, Scalp, and ATACMS systems.
The Global Implications
The debate over providing Ukraine with long-range missiles has sparked a broader discussion about the implications of such a move on global security. If Ukraine is allowed to attack Russian territory with long-range missiles, it could set a dangerous precedent for other conflicts around the world. Moreover, the move could lead to a wider conflict involving NATO countries, potentially drawing in other global powers.
The Way Forward
As the situation remains uncertain, one thing is clear: the decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles has the potential to significantly alter the course of the conflict and global security. World leaders must carefully weigh the risks and benefits of such a move, taking into account the potential consequences for Ukraine, Russia, and the world at large.
Conclusion
The Ukraine-Russia conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue, with no easy solutions. As the debate over long-range missiles continues, it is essential to consider the implications of such a move on the conflict and global security. One thing is certain: the world is watching, and the decisions made in the coming weeks and months will have far-reaching consequences for Ukraine, Russia, and the world.
– What are Ukraine’s main arguments for acquiring long-range missiles from Western allies?
The Ukraine-Russia War: The Battle for Missile Supremacy
As the conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues to escalate, the world is holding its breath as the two nations engage in a high-stakes game of cat and mouse. At the center of this conflict is the issue of missiles, with Ukraine seeking to bolster its defenses against Russian aggression, while Russia warns of catastrophic consequences if Western nations provide Ukraine with long-range missiles.
The Ukrainian Push for Long-Range Missiles
Ukraine has been vocal about its desire to acquire long-range missiles from its Western allies, citing the need to defend itself against Russian aggression. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been in talks with world leaders, including US President Joe Biden and former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, to secure the necessary military aid. Johnson has been particularly supportive, stating that it is “vital that Ukraine can defend itself properly” and that it should be able to use advanced missile systems such as the Storm Shadow, Scalp, and ATACMS.
The Russian Warning: “You Will Be at War with Us”
Russia, on the other hand, has been adamant in its opposition to Ukraine acquiring long-range missiles. Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that if Western nations provide Ukraine with such weapons, it would be seen as a declaration of war. Putin has stated that Russia would make “appropriate decisions” to counter the threat, raising fears of a dramatic escalation of the conflict. Russia’s UN ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, has echoed Putin’s sentiments, warning that if NATO countries provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, it would mean that they are “waging a direct war” against Russia.
The Consequences of Escalation
The stakes are high, and the consequences of escalation are dire. A war between Russia and NATO would be catastrophic, with the potential to draw in other nations and spark a global conflict. The world is holding its breath, waiting to see how the situation will unfold.
The Role of Diplomacy
As tensions rise, diplomacy becomes increasingly important. Zelensky is set to meet with Biden this month to present his “victory plan,” a set of interconnected solutions aimed at giving Ukraine the necessary power and elements to steer the war towards peace. The world is watching, hoping that diplomacy will prevail and a peaceful resolution can be reached.
The Human Cost
As the conflict continues, the human cost mounts. Ukraine has been devastated by the war, with 18% of its territory occupied by Russian forces. The humanitarian crisis is dire, with millions displaced and innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. It is imperative that the international community comes together to find a peaceful solution, one that prioritizes the lives and well-being of the Ukrainian people.
Conclusion
The battle for missile supremacy is a high-stakes game, with far-reaching consequences for the world. As tensions rise, it is imperative that diplomacy prevails, and a peaceful resolution is reached. The human cost of the conflict is too high, and the world cannot afford to let the situation escalate further. Ukraine, Russia, and the international community must come together to find a peaceful solution, one that prioritizes the lives and well-being of all those affected.
Optimized Keywords:
Ukraine-Russia war
Missile supremacy
Long-range missiles
NATO
Russia’s UN ambassador
Vladimir Putin
Volodymyr Zelensky
Diplomacy
Humanitarian crisis
International community
Peaceful resolution
Meta Description:
The Ukraine-Russia war has reached a critical point, with Ukraine seeking long-range missiles from its Western allies and Russia warning of catastrophic consequences. Read more about the escalating tensions and the importance of diplomacy in finding a peaceful solution.
Header Tags:
H1: The Ukraine-Russia War: The Battle for Missile Supremacy
H2: The Ukrainian Push for Long-Range Missiles
H2: The Russian Warning: “You Will Be at War with Us”
H2: The Consequences of Escalation
H2: The Role of Diplomacy
H2: The Human Cost
H2: Conclusion
